Hello Simone, Many thanks for your offer to contribute to the census project. Graham is already working on completing the 1841 and 1871 files, and I have the 1881 LDS census CDs so I can take care of 1881. That leaves 1851, 1861 and 1901 (for which we have all entries, but incomplete information). We have quite a few entries for both 1851 and 1861, but they both need sorting and adding to. I think 1861 is most in need of attention, if you're willing to tackle it. Thanks again, and good luck! James [email protected] wrote the following on 13/11/2006 14:43: >Hi James, > >I'm more than happy to help with the Wiltshire extractions primarily, but after is completed I'm happy to help as and where. > >Regards >Simone. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Sent: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:04 PM >Subject: [LOVELOCK] Looking for volunteers! > > >Hello all, > >Thanks to the efforts of a number of contributors, we have on the Web >site a very impressive collection of source records, including the >"Lovelocks by parish" files for different counties (special mention must >be made here of the work done on these by Robert Sterry), and >collections of census records for certain counties and census years. >However, these collections are far from complete, and I would like to >take this opportunity to appeal to list subscribers to help in adding to >them. > >In order to focus the activity of enriching the material we have, it >would probably be helpful to have some specific goals or projects >(thanks to Robert Sterry for this suggestion). As a start, I've added a >new section, "Projects" to the "Work in Progress" page on the Web site: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/wip.html >and I've listed two projects - one to enhance the collection of census >records, the other to enrich the collections of "lovelocks by parish" - >the latter will require quite a bit of work just to define what needs to >be done. For the first project, which I suggest we focus on initially, >I've produced a table of the current status of our collection of census >records for those counties for which we already have a collection of >source records. The table shows, for each county and census year, the >current status of our collection of Lovelock extracts (complete, >incomplete or not started) and there is also a column for volunteers to >sign up for particular collections. In the past few weeks Graham >Lovelock has already been extracting records for Oxfordshire and >Hampshire, but I haven't yet added his results to the Web site, so I've >put him down as a volunteer for these collections! > >Please let me know if you're willing to contribute to this effort, even >if you are not able to take on a big chunk of work every little helps. > >In order to move towards a more uniform format for the pages of census >records (which is not the case at the moment) I'd be happy to produce >the final HTML files. In order to do this, it's preferable if data is >provided in as simple a format as possible - text files or simple Word >files (without tables) with each field (place, name, relation, >occupation, etc.) separated by at least two spaces. > > >James >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >Lovelock family history Web pages: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ >Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: >http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] >with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of >the message >________________________________________________________________________ >Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >Lovelock family history Web pages: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ >Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: >http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

Yep no problem I can extract from 1861. Is anyone doing 1891? Just to make sure I've understood what you want correctly. Bascially I just search the 1861 census for all the Lovelocks born in Wiltshire and/or living in Wiltshire? Or do you want a specifc split. i.e. 1. all those born in wilts and living in wilts 2. all those born elsewhere but living in wilts; and I take it you want it extracted exactly as it was written? i.e. with obvious spelling mistakes etc? however, I notice you say you have all the entries already - that just require extra info / checking - do you want to send me those files/entries for 1861 and I'll go through and complete them? Sorry if I'm overcomplicating the issue! Just want to make sure I'm off on the right track before ploughing through. Regards Simone. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [LOVELOCK] Looking for volunteers! Hello Simone, Many thanks for your offer to contribute to the census project. Graham is already working on completing the 1841 and 1871 files, and I have the 1881 LDS census CDs so I can take care of 1881. That leaves 1851, 1861 and 1901 (for which we have all entries, but incomplete information). We have quite a few entries for both 1851 and 1861, but they both need sorting and adding to. I think 1861 is most in need of attention, if you're willing to tackle it. Thanks again, and good luck! James [email protected] wrote the following on 13/11/2006 14:43: >Hi James, > >I'm more than happy to help with the Wiltshire extractions primarily, but after is completed I'm happy to help as and where. > >Regards >Simone. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Sent: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:04 PM >Subject: [LOVELOCK] Looking for volunteers! > > >Hello all, > >Thanks to the efforts of a number of contributors, we have on the Web >site a very impressive collection of source records, including the >"Lovelocks by parish" files for different counties (special mention must >be made here of the work done on these by Robert Sterry), and >collections of census records for certain counties and census years. >However, these collections are far from complete, and I would like to >take this opportunity to appeal to list subscribers to help in adding to >them. > >In order to focus the activity of enriching the material we have, it >would probably be helpful to have some specific goals or projects >(thanks to Robert Sterry for this suggestion). As a start, I've added a >new section, "Projects" to the "Work in Progress" page on the Web site: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/wip.html >and I've listed two projects - one to enhance the collection of census >records, the other to enrich the collections of "lovelocks by parish" - >the latter will require quite a bit of work just to define what needs to >be done. For the first project, which I suggest we focus on initially, >I've produced a table of the current status of our collection of census >records for those counties for which we already have a collection of >source records. The table shows, for each county and census year, the >current status of our collection of Lovelock extracts (complete, >incomplete or not started) and there is also a column for volunteers to >sign up for particular collections. In the past few weeks Graham >Lovelock has already been extracting records for Oxfordshire and >Hampshire, but I haven't yet added his results to the Web site, so I've >put him down as a volunteer for these collections! > >Please let me know if you're willing to contribute to this effort, even >if you are not able to take on a big chunk of work every little helps. > >In order to move towards a more uniform format for the pages of census >records (which is not the case at the moment) I'd be happy to produce >the final HTML files. In order to do this, it's preferable if data is >provided in as simple a format as possible - text files or simple Word >files (without tables) with each field (place, name, relation, >occupation, etc.) separated by at least two spaces. > > >James >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >Lovelock family history Web pages: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ >Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: >http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] >with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of >the message >________________________________________________________________________ >Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >Lovelock family history Web pages: >http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ >Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: >http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovelock family history Web pages: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.