James et al I've managed to decipher a bit more of Thomas Loveluck's will. The dubious offspring is probably Henry. Henry L's boss was Hon Frederick West - I think - the name used by the eldest son of Earl de la Warr (or the Pavilion at Bexhill - My grandmother DR Loveluck and her husband JEL (briefly) lived at 31 (now 61) De la Warr Rd!) 1945-55. The ? before the number 38 U Gros St is just "No."! I can't find the Great Hortwell, which could be Stockwell in Fingest, but I'll look at the old OS map. I received the fiche of the PR of Fingest, but there was no Loveluck/Lovelock at all! So TL must have been buried in a nearby parish prob in the direction of Marlow. Perhaps that's where his children were born. IGI seems U/S. John Dixon ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Loveluck" <james.loveluck@numericable.fr> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: Re: Thomas Loveluck will 1839 > John, > > An interesting lead indeed - it certainly makes good sense to track down > some of the LovelUcks outside of Glamorgan, since the idea that our > progenitor John L changed his name from LovelOck to LovelUck is no more > than a hypothesis. Nevertheless, I think its interesting that quite a > few records and MIs of the Glamorgan Lovelucks actually record the name > as LovelOck, and for the Lyneham-Cardiff Lovelocks its clear that there > was a change of name, it occurred quite late, and only concerned part of > the family (Clifford Stanley Loveluck and desecndants). > > I'd very much like to have a copy of the image if its not too much > trouble. I think I owe you a few now! > > James > > > John Dixon wrote: > > >Bucks seem to have been forgotten! > >Today I've downloaded (£3 from pro-online) the image of the will of Thomas Loveluck (died Wycombe 3/1839) dated 6-2-1839, pr 20-12-39 by ML with Henry Loveluck, after L o A were granted to T's widow Mary in July on the "suggestion" that he was intestate. > >He was of Great Hortwell, (I think) in the parish Ffingest (on border with Oxon). After death of ML to be divided between his ch, Mary, Emma, ?Isoury?, Martin and Thomas. > >Youngest son T to have acre of freehold meadow at Grt Marlow. > >wits Henry Loveluck & George Lane. > >HL appeared personally, coachman to honourable Viscount ?Wood? of ?2R0? 38 Upper Grosvenor St Middx > > > >The relationship of Henry to Thomas is not given (or I can't read it!), but appears to be the Henry who d 11-4-1871 aged 84. > > > >I am ordering the fiche (£2.20)of the PR for Fingest (from Oxford!) so might have more to add! Maybe this is the "missing link" to find "our John" of 1739 > > > >Is there any other info from Fingest? > > > >Do you want the image for free James? > > > >I see from my old notes that I visited Chisledon ch yd 24-9-83 and noted John LovelUck d 21-3-1764 age 67 - but no others. Most nearby stones were illegible. > > > >John Dixon > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >

Hello all, I've added "Fragment 17 - The Tasmanian Lovelucks" to the collected Lovelock fragments. This fragment has a long history, and I believe the first version was compiled by Gwen Eastment and Janet Hearle. The version on the Web pages includes some corrections and additional details all provided by Brenda Gregory, who is a descendent of this branch. You'll find the fragment under Fragments->Collected Framents->Lovelock Fragments->Fragment 17 There is also a direct link to it on the "What's New" page. This fragment also has a tiger connection! - see: http://www.maydena.tco.asn.au/Colbail/page4.html Although this branch consistently used the LovelUck name variant, it does not seem to be related to the Glamorgan Lovelucks (my branch) - however, now that John Dixon is on the trail of other LovelUcks perhaps he'll be able to connect these two branches! Regards, James PS I also installed a new version of the HouseSpider search tool - the previous version was skipping some big files. Also, the search should be a bit faster because I've switched to using zipped index files.

Sorry - regarding my email re Martha Lovelock that sentence should read: Her father's name was James Lovelock who was deceased at the time of her marriage in 1878. Maureen New Zealand http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings - Send some online love this Valentine's Day.

Hi everyone I'm hoping there might be a Lovelock out there who can help me with this brick wall I've been up against for quite sometime now. My great grandmother Martha Lovelock married Thomas Frank Wicks 26 September 1878 in the General Baptist Meeting House in Melksham, Wiltshire and on the marriage certificate her age is stated as being 18 years old. Her father's was James Lovelock who was deceased and the time of the marriage. On Martha's daughters birth certificate in 1886 Martha's age is listed as being 21 years old and on her death certificate in 1931 her age is listed as being 67. It also says that she had lived in New Zealand for 52 years. Going off her age when she married she would have been born round 1860 but if the other two ages are the correct ones she would have been born round 1865 but would only have been round 13 years old when she married. Are there any Lovelocks out yonder that have any suggestions or links to this mystery woman?? If so I would be eternally grateful if you could help me solve this problem. Regards Maureen New Zealand. http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings - Send some online love this Valentine's Day.

John, An interesting lead indeed - it certainly makes good sense to track down some of the LovelUcks outside of Glamorgan, since the idea that our progenitor John L changed his name from LovelOck to LovelUck is no more than a hypothesis. Nevertheless, I think its interesting that quite a few records and MIs of the Glamorgan Lovelucks actually record the name as LovelOck, and for the Lyneham-Cardiff Lovelocks its clear that there was a change of name, it occurred quite late, and only concerned part of the family (Clifford Stanley Loveluck and desecndants). I'd very much like to have a copy of the image if its not too much trouble. I think I owe you a few now! James John Dixon wrote: >Bucks seem to have been forgotten! >Today I've downloaded (£3 from pro-online) the image of the will of Thomas Loveluck (died Wycombe 3/1839) dated 6-2-1839, pr 20-12-39 by ML with Henry Loveluck, after L o A were granted to T's widow Mary in July on the "suggestion" that he was intestate. >He was of Great Hortwell, (I think) in the parish Ffingest (on border with Oxon). After death of ML to be divided between his ch, Mary, Emma, ?Isoury?, Martin and Thomas. >Youngest son T to have acre of freehold meadow at Grt Marlow. >wits Henry Loveluck & George Lane. >HL appeared personally, coachman to honourable Viscount ?Wood? of ?2R0? 38 Upper Grosvenor St Middx > >The relationship of Henry to Thomas is not given (or I can't read it!), but appears to be the Henry who d 11-4-1871 aged 84. > >I am ordering the fiche (£2.20)of the PR for Fingest (from Oxford!) so might have more to add! Maybe this is the "missing link" to find "our John" of 1739 > >Is there any other info from Fingest? > >Do you want the image for free James? > >I see from my old notes that I visited Chisledon ch yd 24-9-83 and noted John LovelUck d 21-3-1764 age 67 - but no others. Most nearby stones were illegible. > >John Dixon > > > >

I think I made a mistake by sending the message below to D Digest instead of Lovelock-L@rootsweb.com I would love to be able to find out if my Lovelock's in Hampshire come from Berkshire. I have some further information if it would be of help in identifying my 3xg grandfather John Lovelock of South Tidworth. Keith Taylor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Taylor" <keith.taylor1@ntlworld.com> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Cc: "James Habberfield" <Habberfield@btinternet.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:08 AM Subject: Re: LOVELOCK-D Digest V03 #15 > Hi Graham > > Thank you for your message. > > Having now been able to liase with Jim Habberfield, who is descended from > John Habberfield a brother to my g.grandmother Maria, I can tell you that to > our knowledge John and Rachel had two more daughters. Anne who married > Thomas Blackmore in 1821 and Diana who married William Bredmore in 1817 both > marriages had John Lovelock as a witness. > > All our information comes from the South Tidworth Bishops Transcripts. > > Diana and William also figure in the Admon docs to the will of Hannah > Lovelock widow of William Lovelock, Thomas Lovelock of Shaw in the County of > Berks, Yeoman and Richard Lovelock of the Parish of Speen, Berks, Yeoman. > > Jim and I would be very pleased to hear of any further information you could > give us. > > Thank you, > > Keith Taylor > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <LOVELOCK-D-request@rootsweb.com> > To: <LOVELOCK-D@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:10 PM > Subject: LOVELOCK-D Digest V03 #15 > > >

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:45:39 -0000 Graham Lovelock <lovelockgraham@hotmail.com> wrote: This must be my lot since Hartley Row is in Hartley Wintney and the Hartley Wintney Registration district. There are various James L on the various GRO and census databases on the family website but I am not sure any of them fit in with someone called James born in 1826. But the custodian of my life is my wife Alison so I will ask her when I get home from work. Michael Turner > Good evening everybody. > > Does anyone have any connection with Lovelocks of Hartley Row? > > In particular can anyone identify with a James born there in about 1826? > > Where is it, anyway? Close to Wintney and Wespall, perhaps? > > Regards > > Graham > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > Professor Michael Turner Professor of Economic History Department of History University of Hull Hull HU6 7RX tel: 01482 465913 fax: 01482 466126 e-mail: M.E.Turner@hull.ac.uk

Good evening everybody. Does anyone have any connection with Lovelocks of Hartley Row? In particular can anyone identify with a James born there in about 1826? Where is it, anyway? Close to Wintney and Wespall, perhaps? Regards Graham

Here are the 22 Lovelock wills available from pro-online at £3 each. PROB 11/2231 05 April 1856 Will of Hannah Lovelock of Chelsea , Middlesex PROB 11/2125 03 January 1851 Will of Ann Lovelock , Spinster of Star and Garter Putney , Surrey PROB 11/2210 17 April 1855 Will of John Lovelock , Gentleman of Bishops Waltham , Hampshire PROB 11/1991 16 January 1844 Will of Edward Lovelock , Gentleman of No 14 Chapman Street Islington , Middlesex PROB 11/2076 22 June 1848 Will of John Lovelock , Maltster of Watlington , PROB 11/1703 09 September 1825 Will of Joseph Calladine Lovelock , Victualler of Saint Mary Rotherhithe , Surrey PROB 11/1745 08 September 1828 Will of Ann Lovelock , Spinster of Hampstead , Middlesex PROB 11/1749 12 December 1828 Will of Thomas Lovelock , Yeoman of Speen , Berkshire PROB 11/1514 28 August 1810 Will of Elizabeth Lovelock , Widow of Hungerford , Berkshire PROB 11/1770 28 April 1830 Will of Martin Lovelock , Carpenter of Chertsey , Surrey PROB 11/1831 22 May 1834 Will of Francis Lovelock of Avington , Berkshire PROB 11/1822 09 October 1833 Will of Elizabeth Lovelock of Inkpen , Berkshire PROB 11/1917 11 October 1839 Will of Thomas Lovelock , Gardener of Compton Bassett , Wiltshire PROB 11/1916 07 September 1839 Will of Edward Lovelock of [blank] PROB 11/1070 26 October 1780 Will of Edward Lovelock , Gentleman of Hungerford , Berkshire PROB 11/1138 20 February 1786 Will of Elizabeth Lovelock , Spinster of Avington , Berkshire PROB 11/1048 15 December 1778 Will of Mary Lovelock , Widow of Landon Hills , Essex PROB 11/901 15 August 1764 Will of Elizabeth Marshall Lovelock , Widow of Saint George the Martyr Bloomsbury , Middlesex PROB 11/717 30 April 1742 Will of William Lovelock , Yeoman of Buttermere , Wiltshire PROB 11/738 18 February 1745 Will of Lovelock Maddux , Spinster of Mitcham , Surrey PROB 11/708 25 February 1741 Will of Nicholas Lovelock , Yeoman of Warminster , Wiltshire PROB 11/850 16 November 1759 Will of Noah Lovelock , Yeoman of Shaw , Berkshire John Dixon

Bucks seem to have been forgotten! Today I've downloaded (£3 from pro-online) the image of the will of Thomas Loveluck (died Wycombe 3/1839) dated 6-2-1839, pr 20-12-39 by ML with Henry Loveluck, after L o A were granted to T's widow Mary in July on the "suggestion" that he was intestate. He was of Great Hortwell, (I think) in the parish Ffingest (on border with Oxon). After death of ML to be divided between his ch, Mary, Emma, ?Isoury?, Martin and Thomas. Youngest son T to have acre of freehold meadow at Grt Marlow. wits Henry Loveluck & George Lane. HL appeared personally, coachman to honourable Viscount ?Wood? of ?2R0? 38 Upper Grosvenor St Middx The relationship of Henry to Thomas is not given (or I can't read it!), but appears to be the Henry who d 11-4-1871 aged 84. I am ordering the fiche (£2.20)of the PR for Fingest (from Oxford!) so might have more to add! Maybe this is the "missing link" to find "our John" of 1739 Is there any other info from Fingest? Do you want the image for free James? I see from my old notes that I visited Chisledon ch yd 24-9-83 and noted John LovelUck d 21-3-1764 age 67 - but no others. Most nearby stones were illegible. John Dixon

Interested? Certainly. I just wish a Lovelock with a connection to mother's line would pop up now and again. Living in hope ...... .... in a very very slightly snowed-upon but not even snow-dusted Yate. Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Loveluck" <james.loveluck@numericable.fr> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:07 AM Subject: [Fwd: Lovelock Families] > Hello all, > > Attached is an interesting message I received from John Lewis concerning > Fragment 10 of the "Collected Lovelock Fragments" - Graham should be > interested in this since according to my notes this links to his > maternal line. I'll update the fragment with the additional information > that John suplied. > > Regards, from a snow-covered Grenoble, > > James > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Lovelock Families > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:29:43 +0000 > From: John Lewis <jayell@ntlworld.com> > To: james.loveluck@numericable.fr >

Hello all, Attached is an interesting message I received from John Lewis concerning Fragment 10 of the "Collected Lovelock Fragments" - Graham should be interested in this since according to my notes this links to his maternal line. I'll update the fragment with the additional information that John suplied. Regards, from a snow-covered Grenoble, James -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Lovelock Families Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:29:43 +0000 From: John Lewis <jayell@ntlworld.com> To: james.loveluck@numericable.fr I have just been looking at your website following a posting about it on the Hampshire Rootsweb list. I am doing a 'one place' study of Kingsclere where Lovelocks occur so was interested to see a couple of names I hadn't come across so far. Am also interested in the Brimpton, Berks names as many Ashford Hill, Kingsclere marriages occured betwenn families from these two parishes. The following snippet may be of interest to you as it adds the name of Sarah Ann Occomore's husband to data you have in Fragment 10. My information about the Occomores came from an Occomore descendant. Descendants of Frank Sexton To the great-grandchildren. Frank Sexton. Married to Dorcas Searle, with James Charles, born in December 1861, Chute, Wilts. Married on 17 October 1885, East Woodhay, Hants, to Sarah Ann Occomore, born on 23 April 1863, Charlton, Hants, with Agnes Jane Occomore, born about 12 May 1881, East Woodhay, Hants, died about March 1916, buried on 27 March 1916, Woodcott ?, Hants (age at death: possibly 34 years old). Married on 17 October 1903, Woodcot, Hants, to John Hart, born about 1880, Crux Easton, died in October 1947, Andover (age at death: possibly 67 years old), Farm Carter (1920), with Flora Ivory May, born on 19 June 1903, Woodcott, baptized on 26 July 1903, Woodcott, Hants, died on 30 March 1982, Andover? (age at death: 78 years old). Married in January 1925, Andover, Hants, to Maurice Desmond Blake. Evelyn Gladys, born possibly on 27 December 1905, Woodcott, baptized on 8 January 1906, Woodcott, died possibly on 10 January 1906, buried on 12 January 1906, Woodcott. Edith Audrey, born on 6 May 1908, died on 22 October 1920, Andover (age at death: 12 years old). Wilfred Jack, born on 5 September 1911, died on 31 December 1963 (age at death: 52 years old). Married in October 1939, Brimpton, Hants, to Ivy Hawkins. Albert Ernest Occomore, born on 14 May 1884, East Woodhay, Hants, died on 26 January 1968, Basingstoke, Hants (age at death: 83 years old). Married on 26 October 1916, Andover, Hants, to Daisy Elizabeth Lovelock, born on 4 November 1887, Andover, Hants, died on 8 March 1954, Andover, Hants (age at death: 66 years old), with Doris Irene, born on 10 July 1917, Andover, Hants. Married in December 1940, Andover, Hants, to Norman Graham Darrah, died on 12 October 1941, Kinloss, Scotland. Cyril Douglas, born on 5 April 1919, Andover, Hants. Married about September 1942, Louth, Lincs, to Mary Webster, born in September 1923, Louth, Lincs, died in May 1992, Louth, Lincs (age at death: 68 years old). Arthur Ernest Albert, born on 13 May 1922, Andover, Hants, died in 1995 (age at death: 73 years old). Married in March 1950, Andover, Hants, to Teresa M Gaffney, born about May 1920, Liverpool. Violet May, born on 27 November 1924, Andover, Hants, died on 16 December 1992, Andover (age at death: 68 years old). Married on 4 January 1947, Andover, Hants, to Edward Robert King Lovelock, born on 21 October 1902, Buttermere, Wilts, died on 3 September 1961, Andover, Hants (age at death: 58 years old). Frederick George, born about June 1887, Woodhay, Berks. William Sidney, born about June 1890, Upton, Hants. My interest in the Occomore family is that John (Jack) Hart served with my Grandfather, Francis (Frank) Cooper born Kingsclere, in the trenches in France. Grandfather was killed in 1916 on the Somme. After the war Jack Hart married my Grandmother, Emma Rose nee Barker born Hazely Heath. After my Grandmother's death a couple of years after they married, Jack and his mother Hannah (Alder) went to live with a daughter from his first marriage in Andover and my half-uncle Len went with him. Len was killed in Normandy in 1944. --- John Lewis from Bournemouth, Dorset, UK. using Debian GNU/Linux and GeneWeb genealogy software Main Family Names in HAM are: Kingsclere: BUTLER, COOPER, FISHER, FOSTER, GIRDLER, HAWKINS, SMITH Hazeley Heath: BARKER, CHANDLER, LEWINGTON, NEVILL(E) Main Family Names in GLA are: GRIFFITH, HOPKINS, JENKINS, LEWIS. MORGAN, PHILLIPS and CMN: HOPKINS, DAVIES

Hi Graham Thank you for your message. Having now been able to liase with Jim Habberfield, who is descended from John Habberfield a brother to my g.grandmother Maria, I can tell you that to our knowledge John and Rachel had two more daughters. Anne who married Thomas Blackmore in 1821 and Diana who married William Bredmore in 1817 both marriages had John Lovelock as a witness. All our information comes from the South Tidworth Bishops Transcripts. Diana and William also figure in the Admon docs to the will of Hannah Lovelock widow of William Lovelock, Thomas Lovelock of Shaw in the County of Berks, Yeoman and Richard Lovelock of the Parish of Speen, Berks, Yeoman. Jim and I would be very pleased to hear of any further information you could give us. Thank you, Keith Taylor ----- Original Message ----- From: <LOVELOCK-D-request@rootsweb.com> To: <LOVELOCK-D@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: LOVELOCK-D Digest V03 #15

Keith Nice to be able to welcome you aboard. Alas, I can throw no light on this branch, if that's not mixing metaphors too much, but I have a question and comment or two. If I remember rightly the Thomas/Harriot marriage is in the IGI. Have you, Keith, or anyone else independently verified the details? Did you find the marriage of John and Rachel in the South Tidworth register, as we do not have the information on the Web Site? Does the ST register contain details of any other children of John and Rachel? If not I am surprised that they had Harriot so late. Can we be sure that Harriot is not actually a grand-daughter? Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Taylor" <keith.taylor1@ntlworld.com> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 9:14 PM Subject: Loverlock/Habberfield > I am a recently subscribed member. > > My interest in the Lovelock family is arising from the following outline. > > John Lovelock b1750 was married to Rachel b1751 in South Tidworth Hants. They had, as far as I know, one daughter Harriot Lovelock b1798. Harriot married Thomas Habberfield on the 3 Sep 1818 in the Parish Church of South Tidworth . Thomas and Harriot had three children William, John and my g.grandmother Maria b1822. Maria married my g.grandfather Henry Robert Taylor in Southampton in 1843 and they moved to Plumstead SE18 where they raised their family including my grandfather also called Henry Robert. > > John, Rachel and Harriot all died in 1823 in South Tidworth. > > I would appreciate any further information anybody could give on this branch of the Lovelock family. > > Keith Taylor, > St. Albans. > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >

Hello all, I've updated the file "Lovelucks in Hampshire by Parish" to the latest version provided by Robert Sterry 20-Jan-03. This version includes additional records from the Hampshire Burial Index. Available from: Sources-> Hampshire->Lovelocks in Hampshire by PAris There is also a link on the "What's New" page. Regards, James

I am a recently subscribed member. My interest in the Lovelock family is arising from the following outline. John Lovelock b1750 was married to Rachel b1751 in South Tidworth Hants. They had, as far as I know, one daughter Harriot Lovelock b1798. Harriot married Thomas Habberfield on the 3 Sep 1818 in the Parish Church of South Tidworth . Thomas and Harriot had three children William, John and my g.grandmother Maria b1822. Maria married my g.grandfather Henry Robert Taylor in Southampton in 1843 and they moved to Plumstead SE18 where they raised their family including my grandfather also called Henry Robert. John, Rachel and Harriot all died in 1823 in South Tidworth. I would appreciate any further information anybody could give on this branch of the Lovelock family. Keith Taylor, St. Albans.

Hello all, I couldn't allow the LovelUcks to have a search tool and not the LovelOcks, so as promised I've now added the search facilty to the Lovelock Web pages. You'll find it in the main menu in the general section (Lovelck geneaolgy) and there's also a lnk on the "What's New" page. I'd be interested to learn whether folks find the search tool useful. Regards, James

Ditto, Patsie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Lovelock" <lovelockgraham@hotmail.com> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: Re: LovelUck Web pages updated > James > > You really do continue to do a marvellous job. > > I have persuaded a few people to visit the Site in recent days, and the > general reaction is along the lines of WOW !!! > > And rightly so. > > Regards > > Graham > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Loveluck" > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:24 PM > > > > Hello all, > > > > This is to let you know that I've made quite a few changes to the > > LovelUck Web pages in the last few days. > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >

James You really do continue to do a marvellous job. I have persuaded a few people to visit the Site in recent days, and the general reaction is along the lines of WOW !!! And rightly so. Regards Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Loveluck" Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:24 PM > Hello all, > > This is to let you know that I've made quite a few changes to the > LovelUck Web pages in the last few days.

Hello all, This is to let you know that I've made quite a few changes to the LovelUck Web pages in the last few days. Here are the detail, taken from the "What's New" page: * 22-Jan-03: Replaced the name search tool (which was no longer working since moving the Web pages to numericable.fr) with a new search capability <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/loveluck/search.htm> based on HouseSpider <http://housespider.sf.net/>, a Java applet. * 22-Jan-03: Updated the Family Tree pages <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/loveluck/family-tree.htm> to use the latest version of my Loveluck database. I also persuaded the Ged2Web program to include Events in the Notes which are linked to the Web pages for individuals. I often use Census Events to record details of census returns. * 17-Jan-03: Updated the page containing open questions and issues concerning Loveluck family history <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/loveluck/loveluck-questions.htm> to include some responses and relevant information from Allen Blethyn, Lynne Davis, Catherine Lovelock, Robert Sterry together with bits I dug out myself. * 17-Jan-03: Made some corrections and additions (provided by Allen Blethyn) to the MIs for the Abbey Church of St Mary, Margam <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/loveluck/mis-st-marys-margam.htm>. * 8-Jan-03: On the Family Tree page <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/loveluck/family-tree.htm>, updated to the latest version (V3.02) of the Java Applet, which has some new features - the index can be switched on and off, and the applet starts faster because it uses libraries (jar files). Also, I managed to produce a gedcom file (using PAF) which is handled better by the Java applet. The Java applet does not handle all gedcom 5.0 tags, but a gedcom 4.0 compatible file is handled much better. The notes and sources can now be visualised (in the "List" view) although the presentation is still not perfect. The family tree Web pages had not been updated since Nov 2000, so there are many additions and corrections, too numerous to list. In addition to these change, more information is now availabe on the pages, since they include more notes and events, including census details, etc. Please let me know if you find any errors or omissions, or any problems with the Web pages. Regards, James PS I'm planning to implement the search tool on the LovelOck pages within the next few days.