A message from our Editor Yann Lovelock: "We hope to bring out a 5th issue of the family newsletter in August. It will contain an account of the Chilean branch of the Loveluck family, an update on literary use of the Lovelock name and a survey of musical Lovelocks. However, we need some more articles, notes or feedback, particularly from new contributors, hopefully taking us into new territory. Please contact me at 80 Doris Rd, Birmingham B11 4NF, UK or via yanda_lovelock at yahoo.co.uk with offers or ideas of what you're thinking of sending." Many thanks, Yann PS If you wish to continue receiving a printed copy of Lovelock Lines and have not renewed your subscription please contact me off list. Best Wishes John Lovelock Buckinghamshire UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

Thanks Graham I did reply to Lynne Stone but my e mail bounced back. Best Wishes John -----Original Message----- From: Graham Lovelock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 June 2006 23:23 To: John Lovelock; [email protected] Subject: Re: Emma Lovelock born Bath/Salisbury 1832 All very mysterious, John. Bath, yes - the 1881 gives that. But where has the Salisbury connection come from? And why does Free BMD indicate that John Bernard Hagemeyer married either Ellen Hennessey or Julia Noah in March quarter of 1874, instead of Emma Lovelock? Indeed a perusal of the March 1874 marriage index shows that no Emma Lovelock was married then anywhere in the country. I found John aged 44 and Emma aged 49 (consistent with her being 69 at death) in 1881, but only Bernard aged 29 with wife Emma aged 38 in 1891 (and Emma born in Hoxton, not Bath). Henry C B Hagmeyer married Emma Louisa Bowden in the June quarter of 1890 in Wandsworth, so that explains the 1891 entry. Lynne must have found more information than this - perhaps others can do a better job than me of scanning what's available. I'm still puzzled. Regards Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lovelock" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:30 PM Subject: Emma Lovelock born Bath/Salisbury 1832 > Can anyone on the list help Lynne? > > Best Wishes > > John Lovelock > > Buckinghamshire UK > > -----Original Message----- > From: lynne stone [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 30 May 2006 22:44 > To: John Lovelock > Subject: HELP > > > > DEAR SIR > > I WONDER IF YOU CAN HELP ME , > I HAVE BEEN TRYING FOR A VERY LONG TIME TO FIND THE FAMILY OF EMMA > LOVELOCK SHE WAS BORN IN BATH SAISBURY ABOUT 1832 ,SHE DIED MARCH 1901 > IN LONDON ,SHE MARRIED JOHN BERNARD HAGEMEYER IN LONDON IN MARCH 1874 > WHITECHAPEL . BUT NO MATTER WHERE I LOOK , I CANT FIND HER PARENTS OR IF > SHE HAD BROTHERS OR SISTERS .I SEND YOU TWO ATTACHMENT ,IF YOU NOTE ON > THE CENSUS 1881 IT SAID EMMA SPENCER HAGEMEYER ,I'M WONDERING IF SHE WAS > MARRIED BEFORE ,BUT STILL I COULD ON FIND ANYTHING ON SPENCER EITHER . > > > > MY BEST WISHES LYNNE STONE ( SORRY BUT I > DID NOT KNOW WHO ELSE TO WRITE TO AS I'M RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

All very mysterious, John. Bath, yes - the 1881 gives that. But where has the Salisbury connection come from? And why does Free BMD indicate that John Bernard Hagemeyer married either Ellen Hennessey or Julia Noah in March quarter of 1874, instead of Emma Lovelock? Indeed a perusal of the March 1874 marriage index shows that no Emma Lovelock was married then anywhere in the country. I found John aged 44 and Emma aged 49 (consistent with her being 69 at death) in 1881, but only Bernard aged 29 with wife Emma aged 38 in 1891 (and Emma born in Hoxton, not Bath). Henry C B Hagmeyer married Emma Louisa Bowden in the June quarter of 1890 in Wandsworth, so that explains the 1891 entry. Lynne must have found more information than this - perhaps others can do a better job than me of scanning what's available. I'm still puzzled. Regards Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lovelock" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:30 PM Subject: Emma Lovelock born Bath/Salisbury 1832 > Can anyone on the list help Lynne? > > Best Wishes > > John Lovelock > > Buckinghamshire UK > > -----Original Message----- > From: lynne stone [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 30 May 2006 22:44 > To: John Lovelock > Subject: HELP > > > > DEAR SIR > > I WONDER IF YOU CAN HELP ME , > I HAVE BEEN TRYING FOR A VERY LONG TIME TO FIND THE FAMILY OF EMMA > LOVELOCK SHE WAS BORN IN BATH SAISBURY ABOUT 1832 ,SHE DIED MARCH 1901 > IN LONDON ,SHE MARRIED JOHN BERNARD HAGEMEYER IN LONDON IN MARCH 1874 > WHITECHAPEL . BUT NO MATTER WHERE I LOOK , I CANT FIND HER PARENTS OR IF > SHE HAD BROTHERS OR SISTERS .I SEND YOU TWO ATTACHMENT ,IF YOU NOTE ON > THE CENSUS 1881 IT SAID EMMA SPENCER HAGEMEYER ,I'M WONDERING IF SHE WAS > MARRIED BEFORE ,BUT STILL I COULD ON FIND ANYTHING ON SPENCER EITHER . > > > > MY BEST WISHES LYNNE STONE ( SORRY BUT I > DID NOT KNOW WHO ELSE TO WRITE TO AS I'M RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >

Can anyone on the list help Lynne? Best Wishes John Lovelock Buckinghamshire UK -----Original Message----- From: lynne stone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 30 May 2006 22:44 To: John Lovelock Subject: HELP DEAR SIR I WONDER IF YOU CAN HELP ME , I HAVE BEEN TRYING FOR A VERY LONG TIME TO FIND THE FAMILY OF EMMA LOVELOCK SHE WAS BORN IN BATH SAISBURY ABOUT 1832 ,SHE DIED MARCH 1901 IN LONDON ,SHE MARRIED JOHN BERNARD HAGEMEYER IN LONDON IN MARCH 1874 WHITECHAPEL . BUT NO MATTER WHERE I LOOK , I CANT FIND HER PARENTS OR IF SHE HAD BROTHERS OR SISTERS .I SEND YOU TWO ATTACHMENT ,IF YOU NOTE ON THE CENSUS 1881 IT SAID EMMA SPENCER HAGEMEYER ,I'M WONDERING IF SHE WAS MARRIED BEFORE ,BUT STILL I COULD ON FIND ANYTHING ON SPENCER EITHER . MY BEST WISHES LYNNE STONE ( SORRY BUT I DID NOT KNOW WHO ELSE TO WRITE TO AS I'M RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

Hi Lovies Lots of LOVELOCK's, but also the town of Lovelock, Nevada, USA Link: http://archivegrid.org .. a finding aid and resource link available for free access through June 30th, 2006. ArchiveGrid is a not-for-profit organization. Genealogists, librarians and researchers use this web site to find out where particular genealogies are located along with historical documents and correspondence, etc. It is global. Cheers Col

This is fantastic Robert Would these be the earliest LOVELOCK's recorded ot this site ? Perhaps these paved the way for the Whiltshire Lovelocks & came via Wales ?? I am not familiar with the migration of LOVELOCK's to the Americas, other then the Tasmanian LOVELOCK's ? Great work Cheers Col ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Sterry" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:20 PM Subject: Lovelocks in Bristol St John, Gloucestershire > Greetings all > > > > Found a few Lovelocks in this parish as follows: > > > > Bristol - St John the Baptist > > Baptisms 1558-1743 (PR) > > 1633 May 13 Zacheus the son of George Lovelock yeoman > > 1645 Aug 23 Bridgett the daughter of George Lovelock & Xtian ux. > > 1648 Apr 12 Christian daughter of George Lovelock yeoman et Christian > > 1653 Dec 26 William sonne of John Lovelocke marriner & Ann his wife > > > > Bristol - St John the Baptist > > Marriages 1558-1749 (Modern Transcription); 1800-1839 (Bristol Combined > Marriage Index) > > 1643 Nov 9 George Lovelocke & Christian Powell. Licence. > > > > I believe this is new information. > > > > Best wishes > > > > Robert > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death Records. > New content added every business day. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > > > > __________ NOD32 1.1572 (20060601) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > >

Greetings all Found a few Lovelocks in this parish as follows: Bristol - St John the Baptist Baptisms 1558-1743 (PR) 1633 May 13 Zacheus the son of George Lovelock yeoman 1645 Aug 23 Bridgett the daughter of George Lovelock & Xtian ux. 1648 Apr 12 Christian daughter of George Lovelock yeoman et Christian 1653 Dec 26 William sonne of John Lovelocke marriner & Ann his wife Bristol - St John the Baptist Marriages 1558-1749 (Modern Transcription); 1800-1839 (Bristol Combined Marriage Index) 1643 Nov 9 George Lovelocke & Christian Powell. Licence. I believe this is new information. Best wishes Robert

Hello James, 1. Dont forget me when you finish work on your article about Loveluck`s in Chile. As Aberavon people will be most interested in it. 2.I respect your wishes on not making public about the fraud case of James at Aberavon. It was sad that my David Roderick David was the man at the local court who had to send the case on to the County Assizes. Can you tell me of the date of his arrest abroad. 3. Todays post regarding the Lovelocks of Oystermouth. Unfortunate my computer crash lost mywork on the two neath burials, but I have enough detail in my head to reget that info next week. They are of course the John and Mary Lovelock of Oystermouth. To be correct John worked at Woodlands Castle [ Clyn Castle] for Col George Warde. Use Google for that and also Cambrian Index. 4. Just to finish off. There are some things that we will never find out from any existing records. For instance information about your John loveluck when he first came to Margam. But the Farms of Trissent Margam and their families can give us some food for thought. When Talbot brought John first to Margam he was not going to place him as a stranger and a bachelor in a farm on his own. But I believe that he placed him with a highly thought of friend, at Trissent close to the family of Ann John. We shall see what develops from this line of enquiry, as other records will not contain anything until hehad a farm of his own. You have done sterling work for all the Lovelocks, but with all of that great effert and time spent, you I feel have neglected yourself. Best Regards Allen in sunny Aberavon

Not sure whether these have been mentioned : 1705 Chiseldon Henry Lovelock (mentioned as a landholder with land adjoining Vicar's land ) undated , but late 16th century Mildenhall wilts tenements in Mildenhall: 1 tenement with 1/2 a yardland of 9 1/2 acres held by Robert Lovelock p 290 ditto early 17th century , Mildenhall: "a piece of land abutting upon the wid. Hall and Thomas Lovelock ...p. 290 "Wiltshire Glebe Terriers " Wiltshire record series 56, (2000) Steve Tanner

Hello all, While searching through some papers related to my own family history (Glamorgan Lovelucks) I came across a letter to my aunt which contained extracts from parish registers of All Saints Church, Oystermouth (nr. Swansea, Glamorgan) as follows: Baptisms: 17 Aug 1806 (born 26 Jul) LOVELOCK, Rachel, d of John and Mary 18 Apr 1808 (born 30 Mar) LOVELOCK, George, s of John and Mary 5 Aug 1810 (born 19 Jul) LOVELOCK, John, s of John and Mary 14 Jun 1812 (born 27 May) LOVELOCK, Mary d of John and Mary 8 Dec 1816 (born 23 Nov) LOVELOCK, Elizabeth d of Daniel (Gardner of Maels) and Jane 8 Dec 1816 (born 23 Nov) LOVELOCK, Jane d of Daniel (Gardner of Maels) and Jane Marriages: 4 Jan 1816, LOVELOCK, Daniel (bach.) REES, Jane. (Witnesses, Philip rogers, Augusta Lambourn.) Burials: 21 Feb 1809, LOVELOCK, George s of John 17 Mar 1811, LOVELOCK, John s of John 14 Sep 1815, LOVELOCK, Mary d of John (of Blackpill) age 3 21 Mar 1821, LOVELOCK, Harriet (of Blackpill) age 16 23 Sep 1827, LOVELOCK, Raechel (of Blk Pill) age 21 [Note that Blackpill or Black Pill is an area just north of Oystermouth, on the coast road going from Swansea to the Mumbles] We already had the 1816 marriage of Daniel Lovelock and Jane Rees, and the births and baptisms of their twin daughters, as part of the Lyneham Line. However, the records above include some additonal details such as the witnesses of the marriage and the fact that Daniel was a Gardner at Maels (recall that he was later a gardner at Brewood, Staffs). I couldn't find Maels, but there is an area of Swansea just north of Oystermouth called Mayals, which is probably the same place. It is right next to Black Pill - see above. This leaves a question concerning the baptisms of the children of John and Mary, followed by their rather tragic burials. I'm pretty sure that the John Lovelock in question is not part of my Glamorgan Loveluck line, since there is no likely candidate, and I was wondering if he could be the younger brother of Daniel, baptised at Cherhill 2 Jan 1773. We don't currently have any further information on what became of him. The only suitable marriage of a John Lovelock to a Mary that I could find was that of John Lovelock and Mary Foyle 29 Jan 1798 at Shrewton, but we currently have this couple as progenitors of the Shrewton Tree, with 7 children all baptised at Shrewton with parents John & Mary L. The Oystermouth baptsim records don't include Harriet (who was bur 21 Mar 1821 age 16, so born abt 1805) and I couldn't find a suitable baptism record for her in Wilts either. In the Lovelocks in Glamorgan file there are also probable burial records for the parents John & Mary as follows: *Neath Burials* /The NBI 2nd ed has the following burials for Neath, St Thomas:/ 1837 Jun 30 John Lovelock, 65 1840 Jan 20 Mary Lovelock, 74 The burial for John in 1837 aged 65 would mean that he was born abt 1772, which is consistent with the baptism record at Cherhill 2 Jan 1773. Any comments or ideas as to how we could substaniate my hypothesis would be very welcome! James

Hello Colin, Thanks for your interesting message about Jane Lovelock, daughter of Thomas & Catherine Lovelock. You will find Jane's family in the "Lieflock Line" on the Lovelock Web site: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/lieflock-line.htm However, we only have five children of Thomas and Catherine (née Haywodd): Jane (bap 1811), Rebecca (bap 1813), Ann (bap 1814) John (bap 1816) and Matilda (bap 1821), all baptised at Wootton Rivers. Do you have the names of all 6 children? It would indeed be interesting to have a copy of Jane's letter. If it is a scanned image you won't be able to send it to the mailing list, since attachments are not allowed, but if you send it driectly to me I can add it to the Lovelock Web site. Is Cuckoo's Knob the name of your father's house, or is this a hamlet within Wootton Rivers? The reason I ask is that there is an 1871 census entry for Cuckoo's Knob, and the occupants are George Smart, his wife Harriet (née Lovelock) and their children. Harriet was a cousin of the Jane Lovelock who wrote the letter. Regards, James Colin Alford wrote the following on 20/04/2006 09:24: > Hi, > I have a letter written by Jane Lovelock in 1844 from "The White Hart" > Calne where she refers to a Mr Bladen her master. The letter is > address to her father Thomas Lovelock at Wootton Rivers Pewsey. She is > asking about them and her siblings. I have found out that Thomas was > born 1791 married to Cathrine and Jane was the oldest of the 6 children. > The letter was found in the 60's by my father on the renovation of his > cottage at Cuckoo's Knob Wootton Rivers sealed up in a disused oven > hidden behind a false wall. > I will send a copy if you are interested. > Regards > Colin Alford > > > >

Hi Lovies Just lurking again :-) From the Knightsroot site http://www.knightroots.co.uk/ AVINGTON BURIALS page 4 entry 25 Elizabeth LOVELOCK of Avington March 12 1816 aged 66 years. KINGSCLERE MARRIAGES page 69 entry 207 George LOVELOCK, of this parish & Caroline SMITH, of this parish, by banns, in the presence of Sarah JACOB& William TAYLOR by me Abel BRERETON December 08 1823. page 146 entry 436 Edward LOVELOCK, bachelor, of this parish, & Mary Anne MAY, spinster, of this parish, by banns, in the presence of John MAY & Louisa MILES February ? 1834. There are plenty of POULTER & COOPER too. Happy Easter. Cheers Col

Hi Lovies From HAMPSHIRE-KINGSCLERE list Have fun Cheers Col ASHFORD HILL, PRIMITIVE METHODIST CHAPEL, KINGSCLERE [PERIOD 1912-1968] Marriage 12 Feb 1916 Charles Oliver LOVELOCK 21 bach Ag Machinist of Kingsclere Woodlands Headley Newbury Father: Joseph David LOVELOCK (Deceased)[no Rank or Profession recorded] Alice Louisa HAYTER 18 spin Housemaid Dom of Holly Cottage, Ashford Hill, Newbury Father: [blank] Witnesses: Jessie BUTLER; Thomas Edward LOVELOLOCK Authorised Person for the said Chapel: Albert GRIFFITHS Marriage 26 Apr 1922 Thomas LOVELOCK 67 widr Farmer retd of Plastow Green, Kingsclere Father: Edward LOVELOCK Deceased Florence Mary WEBBER 43 spin of Sunnyside, Headley Father: John WEBBER Retired Farmer Witnesses: George HILL; Kate S. WEBBER; John WEBBER Authorised Person for the said Chapel: Percy JACKSON Marriage witnesses 7 October 1876 at St. Paul, Woodlands Thomas Lovelock & Eliza Lovelock nee Foster. John Lewis [email protected] The Webb family have links to the Kingsclere Lovelock family and also to the Twitchin family (to name but two of the links). In the Hazeley Heath area where my maternal grandmother came from, my surnames are Barker, Chandler, Cooper, Heath, Hill, Hulford, Keep, Knight, Lewington, Lovelock, Neville and Povey. Thomas PEARCE who married Ann Lovelock in Kingsclere in 1806. All 2880 names in the 1851 Kingsclere Census LOVELOCK = 7 people. Francis LOVELOCK of Kingsclere to Ann WEBB by Licence 24 February 1781 at Hannington. Nigel Gerdes [email protected] LOVELOCK has just been added to my North Hampshire list but via a different part of my family line which has traced back from East Ilsley, Berks back to Aldermaston/Burghfield. SMITH *(Highclere), SMITH* (Hannington and Plastow Green), SMITH* (Baughurst), MARTIN*, WATTS*, DIGWEED*, WYTHE, WOODHOUSE* (all Hannington), ALLEN* pre 1800 (Barton Stacey, Deane and Oakley), KENT* (Monk Sherborne), LOVELOCK (North Hampshire, and GIRDLER (Kingclere). Kingsclere Union - Snippets from Minutes Minute Book No 2 [20 Apr 1841 - 25 Mar 1845][HRO Ref PL3/11/3] Page 319 19 Mar 1844 'Ordered that Richard LOVELOCK be prosecuted for absconding from the House with the Union clothing.' Kingsclere marriage of William LOVELOCK to Ann TUCKER 3 June 1810. Edward LOVELOCK and Mary Anne MAY marriage in February 1834 Kingsclere. Kingsclere Burials as taken from the Parish Register. LOVELOCK Hannah of Ashford Hill, Woodlands age 29 years 30 January 1875. Kingsclere Woodlands Burials written as in the Parish Register. LOVELOCK William Charles of Ashford Hill, Woodlands age 7 days 25 February 1876. Burials LOVELOCK Hannah abode Ashford Hill, Woodlands, Parish of Kingsclere age 29 years 30 January 1875. LOVELOCK William Charles abode Ashford Hill, Woodlands Parish of Kingsclere age 7 days old 25 February 1876.

Hi Lovies Just doing a search of the Hampshire & Berkshire list archives. Found these, maybe of interest to one or two of our members :-) 1851 Census H107 1517 page 923 onwards House of Correction, Cold Bath Fields, Clerkenwell, London. Stephen LOVELOCK, Prisoner, married, age 26, Gardener, born Hestely Row, Hants. Marriage at Hartley Wintney 24Dec1836 Timothy SCUFFLE b otp Sarah LOVELOCK (x) sp otp by Banns with consent of parents Wit: Ann Hall (x) Thos Richardson Carol Dale [email protected] While researching a family of interest in NSW Australia, came across a Jesse Lovelock, born 1851 Dogmersfield, son of David Lovelock and Lucy Vickney. Married to a Hepzebiah (surname unknown). Emigrated to Australia in the 1880's after the 1881 census. I have some details of descendants in NSW Australia, if anybody is interested. David Herring [email protected] has a Hampshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK . Sally Baker [email protected] has a Hampshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK . LOVELOCK John born about 1740. Married his second wife Elizabeth O'Briant on September 30,1771 in Collingbourne Kingston,Wilts. Their first child was born in August 1772 in Tangley,Hants. Brian [email protected] (bounced for me ?) has a Hampshire & Berkshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK . Beatrice Eugenie LOVELOCK 1883-1941 Kinsclere, Hampshire m. 1910 to Alfred Cooper 1875-1948. Children George, Cecil, Maurice, Hilda, Nora and Mary known from the Newbury, Berks. Charlotte LOVELOCK bc1819 Maidenhead, Berkshire m. Dec 23, 1839 to Joseph CHARLES at St. John the Baptist, Shoreditch, London. Edward LOVELOCK bc1811 Kingsclere, Hampshire m. Mary Ann MAY bc1812 Brimpton, Berkshire. clive_den [email protected] has a Berkshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK. My name is Denise and i am researching Lovelocks of Berkshire for a friend of mine, can anyone help me with Sidney Lovelock born c 1901 out of wedlock i believe to Annie Lovelock? She is supposed to have had two other elder sisters Rebecca and Rose. Not sure of parents of Annie and sisters yet ? Pamela Jansen [email protected] has a Berkshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK. George GRAY m. late 1800s Annie LOVELOCK. Cheers Col

Thanks Colin Annie Lovelock ( at the bottom of your message ) is one of my Great Aunts. I will drop Pamela a line. Best Wishes John Lovelock Buckinghamshire UK -----Original Message----- From: Colin Borrott-Maloney [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 04 April 2006 13:42 To: [email protected] Subject: Hampshire & berkshire list search results Hi Lovies Just doing a search of the Hampshire & Berkshire list archives. Found these, maybe of interest to one or two of our members :-) Pamela Jansen [email protected] has a Berkshire Surname interest in LOVELOCK. George GRAY m. late 1800s Annie LOVELOCK. Cheers Col ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

I'm trying to send this to everyone I've got in my various e-mail address books, then I remembered the Lovelock list... For anyone who doesn't know me, my oldest and closet friend Tamar was diagnosed with a very aggressive type of cancer in February. She is 26 and should have her whole life ahead of her. Unfortunately the useless government apparently thinks that £50,000 is too much to pay to save her life, so she is being denied the drug that she needs. Without it she might not even see the year out. I could rant for hours if not days on this topic, but it won't help. What will, is if every person she knows, and every person they know, pays a pound at the very least, to try and raise the money she needs to get this drug privately. Forward this message on to as many people as possible, and any ideas for publicity or fund raising much appreciated. Please have a look at this website for more info on how to donate and what's happened to her: http://www.tamarbailey.co.uk/ I know it doesn't mean anything to people that don't know her or me, but I can barely put into words how much she means to me as a friend, and to everyone else who is close to her. I love her and can't live without her. She doesn't deserve this. Please help. Michelle Lovelock ___________________________________________________________ NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/

Hello all, I've added to the Web site a descendant tree for the Glamorgan Lovelucks. Previously there was just a link to the Loveluck Web site, whereas all the other trees were presented as descendant trees, so I've aligned the Glamorgan Lovelucks with the rest. The tree can be found at: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/john-loveluck-descendants.html and is linked to the Trees & Fragments -> Overview page. This was part of an update to the LovelUck web site, details of which can be found on the What's New page on the Loveluck site: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/loveluck/new.html which includes details of the changes and the contributors. I also updated the corresponding database (gedcom file) on the PhpGedView Lovelock/Loveluck portal: http://james.loveluck.free.fr/index.php?command=gedcom&ged=glam-lovelucks.ged James

Once again, I forgot to thank the contributors - I do apologise! Many thanks to Roger Hobbs and Alan Whitaker for their contributions. Thanks also to Shirley Rush, even though her contribution has not yet found its way to the Web site. James James Loveluck wrote: > Hello all, > > I have made some additions and updates to the Web site as follows: > > # Added a Ropley - Portsea/Portsmouth Tree, provided by Roger Hobbs. > This tree, which is linked to the Work in Progress page, includes > Lovelocks from the Portsea/Portsmouth area, together with a proposed > link to the Ropley, Crondall, Dogmersfield Tree going back to Noah > Lovelock (b. abt 1701, Hants). Roger also provided a corresponding > gedcom file, which is linked to the gedcoms page. > > # Updated the Shipton Moyne (Glos) and Derbyshire Tree and the > corresponding gedcom file (on the gedcom files page). > The update includes the following additional details provided by Alan > Whitaker: > * Children of John Rickards and Elizabeth Rickards (née Lovelock) > baptised at Shipton Moyne > * Details of a further child of Frederick Thomas Lovelock > (1878-1952):- Edith Ivy Lovelock born about Feb.1905, plus husband of > latter > * Details of marriages of two of children of Bertha Elizabeth > Lovelock and John Harvey > > # Added to the Work in Progress page details provided by Alan Whitaker > of a stray Lovelock family in Derbyshire, apparently with origins in > Devizes, Wilts > > Details and links are available on the What's New page: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/new.html > > Concerning the Ropley - Portsea/Portsmouth Tree, I have also received > some material related to this tree from Shirley Rush, via Jeremy > Lovelock. Although it is not as complete a Roger's tree, Shirley's > data is in broad agreement with that of Roger, and it does includes > additional details, in particular for the family of Amelia Sophia > Lovelock (born 21 Aug 1862). I hope to include this additional > information at a later stage. > > James >

Hello all, I have made some additions and updates to the Web site as follows: # Added a Ropley - Portsea/Portsmouth Tree, provided by Roger Hobbs. This tree, which is linked to the Work in Progress page, includes Lovelocks from the Portsea/Portsmouth area, together with a proposed link to the Ropley, Crondall, Dogmersfield Tree going back to Noah Lovelock (b. abt 1701, Hants). Roger also provided a corresponding gedcom file, which is linked to the gedcoms page. # Updated the Shipton Moyne (Glos) and Derbyshire Tree and the corresponding gedcom file (on the gedcom files page). The update includes the following additional details provided by Alan Whitaker: * Children of John Rickards and Elizabeth Rickards (née Lovelock) baptised at Shipton Moyne * Details of a further child of Frederick Thomas Lovelock (1878-1952):- Edith Ivy Lovelock born about Feb.1905, plus husband of latter * Details of marriages of two of children of Bertha Elizabeth Lovelock and John Harvey # Added to the Work in Progress page details provided by Alan Whitaker of a stray Lovelock family in Derbyshire, apparently with origins in Devizes, Wilts Details and links are available on the What's New page: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/new.html Concerning the Ropley - Portsea/Portsmouth Tree, I have also received some material related to this tree from Shirley Rush, via Jeremy Lovelock. Although it is not as complete a Roger's tree, Shirley's data is in broad agreement with that of Roger, and it does includes additional details, in particular for the family of Amelia Sophia Lovelock (born 21 Aug 1862). I hope to include this additional information at a later stage. James

Hello all, I've added a link to the University of Leicester "Historical Directories" project to the "Useful Links" page: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/info-for-beginners.html To quote the Historical Directories Web page: "Historical Directories is a digital library of local and trade directories for England and Wales, from 1750 to 1919. It contains high quality reproductions of comparatively rare books, essential tools for research into local and genealogical history." There are 242 entries for Lovelock! James