Thanks, Jack. Carolyn On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack D. Lovelace <lovelacejackd@verizon.net>wrote: > The DNA test for Robet Barry Lovelace, Jr. (kit no. 6434) puts James in > the Maryland DYS 439 (12) group. I do have James as a descendent of Young. > > Carolyn McCoy wrote: > > Nancy & Sue, > > > > I think DNA indicates that James was from the Maryland line. Can anyone > > confirm that? > > > > Carolyn > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Nancy Ross <nlwross@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> What line was he from? > >> > >> Nancy > >> > >> > >> > >>> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:54:51 -0500 > >>> From: c2mccoy@gmail.com > >>> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com > >>> Subject: Re: [LL] James Alexander Monroe Lovelace > >>> > >>> Thanks, Nancy. James Alexander Monroe Lovelace is the > great-grandfather > >>> > >> of > >> > >>> Sue Hassler and me. I have been to the cemetery (it took me a long > time > >>> > >> to > >> > >>> find it) and photographed the grave. The cemetery is just down the > road > >>> from South Fork (of TV fame). James Lovelace died of a heat stroke in > >>> > >> 1882 > >> > >>> when my grandmother was only six months old. After his death his > family > >>> moved to Montague County, Texas, to live with his widow's family. As I > >>> remember, one of the McMillans was married to a Lovelace. > >>> > >>> Carolyn. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > -- > Jack D. Lovelace > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >