In a message dated 12/9/10 3:09:01 PM, lovelacejackd@verizon.net writes: > > > William's test is two off from the modal values of Maryland and four or > five off from the modal values of Dorsetshire (do not yet know the exact > modal values for Dorsetshire). > > It is possible that William is descended from somebody from Dorsetshire, > but they came to Kentucky via Maryland. > Okay. My pet theory is back on. Out of curiousity how does he compare with those of the line of John who married Rachel Van Horn? Don't we have someone from that line who has done DNA. I'm still wondering about the Joseph Lovelace whose name was on the land that John got in KY. Thinking John and Joseph might have been brothers and Joseph could have left orphans. Lou Ann

Test #25740 Robert W. Loveless (the knife maker guy) is descended from John and Rachel Van Hook Loveless. He is in the MD group. This family did go to KY very early. These were the Loveless captured at Martin's fort and taken to Canada during the Rev. War. Some stayed in Ohio, some did return to KY after their release. Linda Parsons -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Brondak@aol.com Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:25 PM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] DNA testing In a message dated 12/9/10 3:09:01 PM, lovelacejackd@verizon.net writes: > > > William's test is two off from the modal values of Maryland and four or > five off from the modal values of Dorsetshire (do not yet know the exact > modal values for Dorsetshire). > > It is possible that William is descended from somebody from Dorsetshire, > but they came to Kentucky via Maryland. > Okay. My pet theory is back on. Out of curiousity how does he compare with those of the line of John who married Rachel Van Horn? Don't we have someone from that line who has done DNA. I'm still wondering about the Joseph Lovelace whose name was on the land that John got in KY. Thinking John and Joseph might have been brothers and Joseph could have left orphans. Lou Ann ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Kit No. 25740 for Robert W. Loveless is in the DYS 439 (12) group. Which means that he is somehow related to John Lovelace who married Nancy Bohanan Lovelace and to Young Lovelace. Brondak@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 12/9/10 3:09:01 PM, lovelacejackd@verizon.net writes: > > > >> William's test is two off from the modal values of Maryland and four or >> five off from the modal values of Dorsetshire (do not yet know the exact >> modal values for Dorsetshire). >> >> It is possible that William is descended from somebody from Dorsetshire, >> but they came to Kentucky via Maryland. >> >> > > Okay. My pet theory is back on. Out of curiousity how does he compare > with > those of the line of John who married Rachel Van Horn? > Lou Ann > > > -- Jack D. Lovelace