RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [LL] New 37-marker "White" surname yDNA > test for Terry
    2. Wanda Rabb
    3. Hi Terry, This sounds so familiar...we were floored when my husband's DNA test came back showing he matched others with the HICKS surname. Also, a descendant of one of his gr-grandfather's brothers tested the same way so we figure whatever happened occurred prior to their birthdates of ca 1830. It is mind blowing though to receive that information. Wanda ----------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:27:49 -0400 > From: "T.J. White" <tjwhite1963@gmail.com> > Subject: [LL] New 37-marker "White" surname yDNA test for > Terry > To: Lovelace-L@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: >     <AANLkTimeYN85NpMuYJHrlqejKienWx9_jdNjHtTyPaji@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi everyone, > > Some of you will remember me. I've been very quiet lately. > This is not > related to the Lovelxxx surname (which is among my > ancestry, however), but > is about genetic genealogy in general. > > I thought I'd mention, for whatever it is worth, that I > recently did a > 37-marker yDNA test on myself, and my results are clear, > unequivocal, and > even dramatic: > > It so happens that I PRECISELY match the modal haplotype > (at 37 markers > tested), not for any family surnamed "White" (as I would > have expected), but > a surname of "Brewer". >

    06/18/2010 03:59:48
    1. Re: [LL] New 37-marker "White" surname yDNA > test for Terry
    2. terrence White
    3. Hi Wanda,   Thanks for the reply! Yes, I have to agree with you--this new development caught us completely off guard! Still getting used to the idea of being a "Brewer" and not a "White"!   Take care,   Terry --- On Fri, 6/18/10, Wanda Rabb <wcr1951@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Wanda Rabb <wcr1951@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [LL] New 37-marker "White" surname yDNA > test for Terry To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 12:59 PM Hi Terry, This sounds so familiar...we were floored when my husband's DNA test came back showing he matched others with the HICKS surname.  Also, a descendant of one of his gr-grandfather's brothers tested the same way so we figure whatever happened occurred prior to their birthdates of ca 1830.  It is mind blowing though to receive that information. Wanda ----------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:27:49 -0400 > From: "T.J. White" <tjwhite1963@gmail.com> > Subject: [LL] New 37-marker "White" surname yDNA test for > Terry > To: Lovelace-L@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: >     <AANLkTimeYN85NpMuYJHrlqejKienWx9_jdNjHtTyPaji@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi everyone, > > Some of you will remember me. I've been very quiet lately. > This is not > related to the Lovelxxx surname (which is among my > ancestry, however), but > is about genetic genealogy in general. > > I thought I'd mention, for whatever it is worth, that I > recently did a > 37-marker yDNA test on myself, and my results are clear, > unequivocal, and > even dramatic: > > It so happens that I PRECISELY match the modal haplotype > (at 37 markers > tested), not for any family surnamed "White" (as I would > have expected), but > a surname of "Brewer". >       ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    06/20/2010 11:18:56