Yes, your message came through at 9:29. I sent mine earlier, at 8:55, so they must have crossed in the ether! Greg had commented that Nathan Lovelace came from the James Loveless of Tishomingo line. Now we see that Nathan came from Hazel>Francis>Joseph. Do I have that correct? > > Martha > There stands the castle > by yon tuft of trees William Shakespeare Sent from my iPad > On Jun 27, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Brondak via <lovelace@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > > In a message dated 6/27/16 10:55:57 AM, lovelace@rootsweb.com writes: > > >> I don’t think Nathan and Delma Lovelace are from the James (Loveless) of >> Tishomingo (1796-1851) line. > They're not. They're from Hazel of Newberry. Didn't my other message > come through? > > The following is what I sent earlier: > Greg, > All of the info in your post fits exactly with what I have on the family > and even added a date or place or too. I didn't find them initially because I > had them spelled Loveless in my files. The surname > changed spellings with a lot of the ones in the families, > > I have the father of Joseph as > Francis b ca 1793 SC, Newberry Dist married to Elizabeth with the possible > surname of HIPP. > I have 11 children for them including Joseph. > > I have Francis as the son of Hazel of Newberry and his unknown wife, I > show that Francis moved > first to Lauderdale Co AL and then to MS aft 1855 and then to TN where he > probably died, but I don't have a definite date or place. I have a note > that someone gave him a death date of 1846, but that's not right since he's on > an 1850 census and beyond. > > Some of my info on them came from Melissa, some from census records, etc. > Lou Ann > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message