In a message dated 6/27/16 2:36:10 PM, lovelacejackd@verizon.net writes: > Lou Ann, > > How do we known this? > > Nancy Bohanan is not a Jane. > Ok Jack, you've got me.  I'm not sure why but I have her as Jane/Nancy/Nancy Jane.  Do you have a marriage record of some kind for them.  I show all their kids were born in MD and that they were in Culpeper after 1763.  Do you have evidence to the contrary? Thanks Lou Ann

My memory is not as good as it used to be, but I remember learning in an old-old genealogy course that Nancy and Jane were once used intermittantly like a nickname. Is this possible? Sort of like Richard and Dick, or Williiam and Bill or Billy. Just a thought. ---- Brondak via <lovelace@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > In a message dated 6/27/16 2:36:10 PM, lovelacejackd@verizon.net writes: > > > > Lou Ann, > > > > How do we known this? > > > > Nancy Bohanan is not a Jane. > > > > > > Ok Jack, you've got me.  I'm not sure why but I have her as > Jane/Nancy/Nancy Jane.  Do you have > a marriage record of some kind for them.  I show all their kids were born > in MD and that they were > in Culpeper after 1763.  Do you have evidence to the contrary? > Thanks > Lou Ann > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message