In a message dated 3/23/11 6:26:54 PM, brnwyn98@yahoo.com writes: > Dang!  Someone, somewhere must know.  There is a slip of paper somewhere > with > that information on it.  There always is!  But sometimes you just never > find > it.... >  Blessings, > Rita Smallcombe > > What we do know is that he married in MD sometime between 1783 and 1790. He is on the 1790 census in Montgomery Co MD with three children and a wife. We can "assume" she was from a family who lived nearby and/or went to the same church they did, but that's all I really know. I haven't examined records in that part of MD in depth, but I have looked a little bit for church or other records without success. Lou Ann

Yes, the information is attached to Thomas R. Loveless. Thanks. Jane In a message dated 3/23/2011 5:33:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jimmie.ryan@verizon.net writes: That's just unfortunate then... I have noticed though in Ancestry Family Tree Software you can make a note private or public, so when you export/upload your GENCOM it makes them either or. Some have uploaded word or WordPerfect files, and even PDFs that also become "notes" or "stories." I hope you work this out; and the information is removed one way or the other. May I ask who this is attached to so I can check my file to insure I have not copied that "story" to my database, then I can propyl remove it to my private file on my hard drive. Good Luck..., and if you do not want to mention the name I will just go through all my "Lovelxxx" data and make sure the notes are removed to "private." Thanks again for bring this to our attention... Cuz Jimmie -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Treenutty@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:40 PM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information This personal information of my family showed up on a "story" connected to a tree. It would have been in the notes of the person who uploaded it. When he uploaded it he didn't designate the content and the notes do appear. I am not an invitee to this person's tree. I have a very limited tree on ancestry. Nothing of my own genealogy program has ever been uploaded by anyone in my family. To make matters more sad, the person who attached this information to ancestry is a member of the Lovelxxx list. He should have known better. I am working with Ancestry.com now to remedy the situation. They are very helpful. In a message dated 3/23/2011 3:34:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jimmie.ryan@verizon.net writes: The notes are only seen by the Editor (that includes if you assign that designation to anyone you invite), it does not show up for "contributors or other invitee." Also we need to remember that most of the family files were once rootsweb, so to blame Ancestry for what some of the old lists did years ago may be a bit inappropriate. We should also note that Ancestry has got to great lengths to increase the security of the trees and those that see them. If you feel you have sensitive information then you can make your tree "private," and nobody can see anything (it does thou defeat the purpose of finding others in your question to figure out those brick walls) yet that will keep any personal stuff from being exposed. We also must remember that in the beginning (Rootsweb, lists, or family sites) many did not know better and posted to the internet in hopes of finding family and fellow researchers, as I did and now see many from my original tree come back to me now, especially the wrong ones. I took down my ancestry file last year, and THANK YOU for reminding me I need to go through all 79,000 individuals that I uploaded to insure I have nobody's personal information in there. On the old rootsweb some believed that if they put their birth date in the death date it would protect them; unfortunately, when Ancestry converted these files it exposed all those individuals as they are noted as dead, and I can tell you there is not one Shipman in my database that did not have to be modified; so that is another surprise that some may find in the family tree's on ancestry. Jimmie Ryan -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Lori Lovelace Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:58 AM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information Some people are just sloppy about protecting information on-line. I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did not mean harm but were definitely careless and reckless. One thing Ancestry users need to pay attention to is Notes vs. Comments. Notes can only be seen by the owner of the tree and anyone with edit capabilities. Comments can be seen by anyone unless the comment is for a living person. But even then there are settings where this restriction can be relaxed. So if you add a comment about a living grandchild but it is attached to someone that is deceased it will be visible. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

In a message dated 3/23/11 7:11:52 AM, greglovelace@comcast.net writes: > > Well, of course you're right, Lou Ann....  My apologies.  Guess I need > to make sure to double check before I pop off  ;-) > > Peace, > Part of the Tree, > Greg > > Well lots of folks do that on those trees you find posted. Don't know why they don't figure out the dates before posting, but oh, well. Lou Ann

In a message dated 3/23/11 7:26:28 AM, brnwyn98@yahoo.com writes: > This Benjamin is in my line. He's the father of my ancestor Reason, > father of > Alba, father of my grandfather Roland Lovelace.  > > > Does anyone have any idea who Benjamins mother might have > been?   Blessings, > Rita Smallcombe > Nope, we have never (yet) been able to determine who Reason's first wife was. Lou Ann

This personal information of my family showed up on a "story" connected to a tree. It would have been in the notes of the person who uploaded it. When he uploaded it he didn't designate the content and the notes do appear. I am not an invitee to this person's tree. I have a very limited tree on ancestry. Nothing of my own genealogy program has ever been uploaded by anyone in my family. To make matters more sad, the person who attached this information to ancestry is a member of the Lovelxxx list. He should have known better. I am working with Ancestry.com now to remedy the situation. They are very helpful. In a message dated 3/23/2011 3:34:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jimmie.ryan@verizon.net writes: The notes are only seen by the Editor (that includes if you assign that designation to anyone you invite), it does not show up for "contributors or other invitee." Also we need to remember that most of the family files were once rootsweb, so to blame Ancestry for what some of the old lists did years ago may be a bit inappropriate. We should also note that Ancestry has got to great lengths to increase the security of the trees and those that see them. If you feel you have sensitive information then you can make your tree "private," and nobody can see anything (it does thou defeat the purpose of finding others in your question to figure out those brick walls) yet that will keep any personal stuff from being exposed. We also must remember that in the beginning (Rootsweb, lists, or family sites) many did not know better and posted to the internet in hopes of finding family and fellow researchers, as I did and now see many from my original tree come back to me now, especially the wrong ones. I took down my ancestry file last year, and THANK YOU for reminding me I need to go through all 79,000 individuals that I uploaded to insure I have nobody's personal information in there. On the old rootsweb some believed that if they put their birth date in the death date it would protect them; unfortunately, when Ancestry converted these files it exposed all those individuals as they are noted as dead, and I can tell you there is not one Shipman in my database that did not have to be modified; so that is another surprise that some may find in the family tree's on ancestry. Jimmie Ryan -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Lori Lovelace Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:58 AM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information Some people are just sloppy about protecting information on-line. I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did not mean harm but were definitely careless and reckless. One thing Ancestry users need to pay attention to is Notes vs. Comments. Notes can only be seen by the owner of the tree and anyone with edit capabilities. Comments can be seen by anyone unless the comment is for a living person. But even then there are settings where this restriction can be relaxed. So if you add a comment about a living grandchild but it is attached to someone that is deceased it will be visible. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

That's just unfortunate then... I have noticed though in Ancestry Family Tree Software you can make a note private or public, so when you export/upload your GENCOM it makes them either or. Some have uploaded word or WordPerfect files, and even PDFs that also become "notes" or "stories." I hope you work this out; and the information is removed one way or the other. May I ask who this is attached to so I can check my file to insure I have not copied that "story" to my database, then I can propyl remove it to my private file on my hard drive. Good Luck..., and if you do not want to mention the name I will just go through all my "Lovelxxx" data and make sure the notes are removed to "private." Thanks again for bring this to our attention... Cuz Jimmie -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Treenutty@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:40 PM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information This personal information of my family showed up on a "story" connected to a tree. It would have been in the notes of the person who uploaded it. When he uploaded it he didn't designate the content and the notes do appear. I am not an invitee to this person's tree. I have a very limited tree on ancestry. Nothing of my own genealogy program has ever been uploaded by anyone in my family. To make matters more sad, the person who attached this information to ancestry is a member of the Lovelxxx list. He should have known better. I am working with Ancestry.com now to remedy the situation. They are very helpful. In a message dated 3/23/2011 3:34:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jimmie.ryan@verizon.net writes: The notes are only seen by the Editor (that includes if you assign that designation to anyone you invite), it does not show up for "contributors or other invitee." Also we need to remember that most of the family files were once rootsweb, so to blame Ancestry for what some of the old lists did years ago may be a bit inappropriate. We should also note that Ancestry has got to great lengths to increase the security of the trees and those that see them. If you feel you have sensitive information then you can make your tree "private," and nobody can see anything (it does thou defeat the purpose of finding others in your question to figure out those brick walls) yet that will keep any personal stuff from being exposed. We also must remember that in the beginning (Rootsweb, lists, or family sites) many did not know better and posted to the internet in hopes of finding family and fellow researchers, as I did and now see many from my original tree come back to me now, especially the wrong ones. I took down my ancestry file last year, and THANK YOU for reminding me I need to go through all 79,000 individuals that I uploaded to insure I have nobody's personal information in there. On the old rootsweb some believed that if they put their birth date in the death date it would protect them; unfortunately, when Ancestry converted these files it exposed all those individuals as they are noted as dead, and I can tell you there is not one Shipman in my database that did not have to be modified; so that is another surprise that some may find in the family tree's on ancestry. Jimmie Ryan -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Lori Lovelace Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:58 AM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information Some people are just sloppy about protecting information on-line. I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did not mean harm but were definitely careless and reckless. One thing Ancestry users need to pay attention to is Notes vs. Comments. Notes can only be seen by the owner of the tree and anyone with edit capabilities. Comments can be seen by anyone unless the comment is for a living person. But even then there are settings where this restriction can be relaxed. So if you add a comment about a living grandchild but it is attached to someone that is deceased it will be visible. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Dang!  Someone, somewhere must know.  There is a slip of paper somewhere with that information on it.  There always is!  But sometimes you just never find it....  Blessings, Rita Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams because they don't believe they are possible. ________________________________ From: "Brondak@aol.com" <Brondak@aol.com> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Wed, March 23, 2011 8:16:47 PM Subject: Re: [LL] [PML] Brown/Lovelace marriage, Knox Co., TN In a message dated 3/23/11 7:26:28 AM, brnwyn98@yahoo.com writes: > This Benjamin is in my line. He's the father of my ancestor Reason, > father of > Alba, father of my grandfather Roland Lovelace.  > > > Does anyone have any idea who Benjamins mother might have > been?   Blessings, > Rita Smallcombe > Nope, we have never (yet) been able to determine who Reason's first wife was. Lou Ann ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

One more thing... the comments go to the "owner" of the account and it is a good way to inform them of the information that is in question. I am not sure who can see the comments, I can on some tree's, yet I am invited to them, others do not display the comments, even on photographs.

The notes are only seen by the Editor (that includes if you assign that designation to anyone you invite), it does not show up for "contributors or other invitee." Also we need to remember that most of the family files were once rootsweb, so to blame Ancestry for what some of the old lists did years ago may be a bit inappropriate. We should also note that Ancestry has got to great lengths to increase the security of the trees and those that see them. If you feel you have sensitive information then you can make your tree "private," and nobody can see anything (it does thou defeat the purpose of finding others in your question to figure out those brick walls) yet that will keep any personal stuff from being exposed. We also must remember that in the beginning (Rootsweb, lists, or family sites) many did not know better and posted to the internet in hopes of finding family and fellow researchers, as I did and now see many from my original tree come back to me now, especially the wrong ones. I took down my ancestry file last year, and THANK YOU for reminding me I need to go through all 79,000 individuals that I uploaded to insure I have nobody's personal information in there. On the old rootsweb some believed that if they put their birth date in the death date it would protect them; unfortunately, when Ancestry converted these files it exposed all those individuals as they are noted as dead, and I can tell you there is not one Shipman in my database that did not have to be modified; so that is another surprise that some may find in the family tree's on ancestry. Jimmie Ryan -----Original Message----- From: lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lovelace-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Lori Lovelace Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:58 AM To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LL] personal information Some people are just sloppy about protecting information on-line. I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did not mean harm but were definitely careless and reckless. One thing Ancestry users need to pay attention to is Notes vs. Comments. Notes can only be seen by the owner of the tree and anyone with edit capabilities. Comments can be seen by anyone unless the comment is for a living person. But even then there are settings where this restriction can be relaxed. So if you add a comment about a living grandchild but it is attached to someone that is deceased it will be visible. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On 3/22/2011 8:17 PM, Lou Ann wrote: >> Benjamin had to be the son of Reason's first unknown wife. Benjamin& Joanna were married in 1813 and Reason didn't marry Peggy Clark until 1811. >> Well, of course you're right, Lou Ann.... My apologies. Guess I need to make sure to double check before I pop off ;-) Peace, Part of the Tree, Greg

Some people are just sloppy about protecting information on-line. I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did not mean harm but were definitely careless and reckless. One thing Ancestry users need to pay attention to is Notes vs. Comments. Notes can only be seen by the owner of the tree and anyone with edit capabilities. Comments can be seen by anyone unless the comment is for a living person. But even then there are settings where this restriction can be relaxed. So if you add a comment about a living grandchild but it is attached to someone that is deceased it will be visible.

This Benjamin is in my line. He's the father of my ancestor Reason, father of Alba, father of my grandfather Roland Lovelace.  Does anyone have any idea who Benjamins mother might have been?   Blessings, Rita Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams because they don't believe they are possible. ________________________________ From: Greg Lovelace <greglovelace@comcast.net> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Wed, March 23, 2011 9:09:55 AM Subject: Re: [LL] [PML] Brown/Lovelace marriage, Knox Co., TN On 3/22/2011 8:17 PM, Lou Ann wrote: >> Benjamin had to be the son of Reason's first unknown wife.  Benjamin&  Joanna >>were married in 1813 and Reason didn't marry Peggy Clark until  1811. >>      Well, of course you're right, Lou Ann....  My apologies.  Guess I need to make sure to double check before I pop off  ;-) Peace, Part of the Tree, Greg ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

That is absolutely horrendous. I have some family stories posted with my stuff, but only about the deceased, and cherished family stories, not things that might cause embarrassment or give out too personal information. I think that maybe many researchers simply don't realize that you can't trust Ancestry (or any other online group) to list the living as "Living." Tommi L

I just got off the phone with ancestry.com. They advised me to contact these people to see if they would take it off. If not, I will contact _CustomerSolutions@ancestry.com_ (mailto:CustomerSolutions@ancestry.com) and they will help. Good to know. Jane In a message dated 3/22/2011 5:20:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, brnwyn98@yahoo.com writes: Jane, Unfortunately there are those kind of people out there. Most of us family researchers know how to keep things off the internet that should be and only share what should be shared. I am so sorry someone you obviously trusted did that to you. Best of luck in finding everyone and getting it removed. You might also try contacting Ancestry.com to see if there is anything they can do to help. Blessings, Rita Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams because they don't believe they are possible. ________________________________ From: "Treenutty@aol.com" <Treenutty@aol.com> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 8:07:45 PM Subject: [LL] Private information I recently joined ancestry.com to get back to researching all these mystery people. Of course one of my brick walls is Thomas R. Loveless. I accessed information about him that was already on ancestry. I clicked on a "story" that someone uploaded to ancestry.com. I was totally HORRIFIED to find a complete genealogy report of my family, including my infant grandchildren. There were even personal stories about my family. Now I sent this to someone in complete confidence that they would not publish any personal information. I can't imagine the insensitivity it took for them to pass this information on to whomever they felt like. The "story" has been repeated by several other researchers. I am going to have to contact each one of them through ancestry.com. If you are reading this and are one of the guilty ones, please take this information off immediately!! Jane Westlake ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

In a message dated 3/22/11 6:59:17 AM, greglovelace@comcast.net writes: > > Sparks Lovelace.  Benjamin was the son of Reason and Peggy Clark > Lovelace.  Reason was the son of Benjamin and Sarah ?Robey? Lovelace.  > Benjamin's ancestry traces back to Dorset, England as shown by DNA > testing.] > > Benjamin had to be the son of Reason's first unknown wife. Benjamin & Joanna were married in 1813 and Reason didn't marry Peggy Clark until 1811. Lou Ann

I recently joined ancestry.com to get back to researching all these mystery people. Of course one of my brick walls is Thomas R. Loveless. I accessed information about him that was already on ancestry. I clicked on a "story" that someone uploaded to ancestry.com. I was totally HORRIFIED to find a complete genealogy report of my family, including my infant grandchildren. There were even personal stories about my family. Now I sent this to someone in complete confidence that they would not publish any personal information. I can't imagine the insensitivity it took for them to pass this information on to whomever they felt like. The "story" has been repeated by several other researchers. I am going to have to contact each one of them through ancestry.com. If you are reading this and are one of the guilty ones, please take this information off immediately!! Jane Westlake

I am still in shock that someone would post information like that. Don't they realize that posting personal information about living people can be harmful?  Identity thiefs are always on the lookout for information like this. If you haven't already told them off I would!  That was just plain rude and inconsiderate.  Blessings, Rita Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams because they don't believe they are possible. ________________________________ From: "Treenutty@aol.com" <Treenutty@aol.com> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 8:26:55 PM Subject: Re: [LL] Private information I just got off the phone with ancestry.com.  They advised me to  contact these people to see if they would take it off.  If not, I will  contact _CustomerSolutions@ancestry.com_ (mailto:CustomerSolutions@ancestry.com)  and they will help.  Good to know. Jane In a message dated 3/22/2011 5:20:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  brnwyn98@yahoo.com writes: Jane,  Unfortunately there are those kind of people out there.  Most of us  family researchers know how to keep things off the internet that should be  and only share what should be shared.  I am so sorry someone you  obviously trusted did that to you.  Best of luck in finding everyone  and getting it removed. You might also try contacting Ancestry.com to see  if there is anything they can do to help. Blessings, Rita  Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance  Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams  because they don't believe they are possible.  ________________________________ From:  "Treenutty@aol.com" <Treenutty@aol.com> To:  lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 8:07:45 PM Subject: [LL]  Private information I recently joined ancestry.com to get back to  researching all these mystery people.  Of course one of my brick  walls is Thomas R. Loveless.  I  accessed information about him  that was already on ancestry.  I clicked on a "story" that  someone uploaded to ancestry.com.  I was totally  HORRIFIED to find  a complete genealogy report of my family, including my infant  grandchildren.  There were even personal stories about my  family.  Now  I sent this to someone in complete  confidence that they would not publish any  personal  information.  I can't imagine the insensitivity it took for  them to pass this information on to whomever they felt like.  The  "story"  has been repeated by several other researchers.  I am  going to have to  contact each one of them through  ancestry.com.  If you are reading this and are one of the guilty  ones, please take this  information off immediately!! Jane  Westlake ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the  list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word  'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the  message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the  list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word  'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the  message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Jane, Unfortunately there are those kind of people out there.  Most of us family researchers know how to keep things off the internet that should be and only share what should be shared.  I am so sorry someone you obviously trusted did that to you.  Best of luck in finding everyone and getting it removed. You might also try contacting Ancestry.com to see if there is anything they can do to help.  Blessings, Rita Smallcombe Advertising/Marketing Director Mayfaire Renaissance Festival www.mayfaireren.com People don't go after their dreams because they don't believe they are possible. ________________________________ From: "Treenutty@aol.com" <Treenutty@aol.com> To: lovelace@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 8:07:45 PM Subject: [LL] Private information I recently joined ancestry.com to get back to researching all these mystery people.  Of course one of my brick walls is Thomas R. Loveless.  I  accessed information about him that was already on ancestry.  I clicked on  a "story" that someone uploaded to ancestry.com.  I was totally  HORRIFIED to find a complete genealogy report of my family, including my infant  grandchildren.  There were even personal stories about my family.  Now  I sent this to someone in complete confidence that they would not publish any  personal information.  I can't imagine the insensitivity it took for  them to pass this information on to whomever they felt like.  The "story"  has been repeated by several other researchers.  I am going to have to  contact each one of them through ancestry.com.  If you are reading this and are one of the guilty ones, please take this  information off immediately!! Jane Westlake ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

"Mollie" Mary R. Lovelace and James Brown are my husband's GGgrandparents. In the family pictures we have a photograph of an old man labeled "William R Lovelace, Father" > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:56:59 -0400 > From: greglovelace@comcast.net > To: lovelace@rootsweb.com > Subject: [LL] [PML] Brown/Lovelace marriage, Knox Co., TN > > [Greg's note: I have found several files on WorldConnect which show > Mary Roset Lovelace married to James B. Brown c1875. The listing below > is for James B. Brown married to Mollie R. Lovelace, and I believe her > to be Mary Roset. Mary was the daughter of William Ramsey and Eliza > Nott Lovelace. William Ramsey was the son of Benjamin and Johanna > Sparks Lovelace. Benjamin was the son of Reason and Peggy Clark > Lovelace. Reason was the son of Benjamin and Sarah ?Robey? Lovelace. > Benjamin's ancestry traces back to Dorset, England as shown by DNA testing.] > > > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:52:06 -0600 > > Source: TNKNOX@rootsweb.com > Subject: [TNKNOX] Knox marriages > > These are marriages from Knox co TN, transcribed from a collection that my > aunt made before she passed away. > <<snip>> > BROWN, James B.& Mollie R. LOVELACE; 7 Sep 1876 > <<snip>> > LOVELACE, Mollie R.& James B. BROWN; 7 Sep 1876 > <<snip>> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELACE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

[Greg's note: I have found several files on WorldConnect which show Mary Roset Lovelace married to James B. Brown c1875. The listing below is for James B. Brown married to Mollie R. Lovelace, and I believe her to be Mary Roset. Mary was the daughter of William Ramsey and Eliza Nott Lovelace. William Ramsey was the son of Benjamin and Johanna Sparks Lovelace. Benjamin was the son of Reason and Peggy Clark Lovelace. Reason was the son of Benjamin and Sarah ?Robey? Lovelace. Benjamin's ancestry traces back to Dorset, England as shown by DNA testing.] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:52:06 -0600 Source: TNKNOX@rootsweb.com Subject: [TNKNOX] Knox marriages These are marriages from Knox co TN, transcribed from a collection that my aunt made before she passed away. <<snip>> BROWN, James B.& Mollie R. LOVELACE; 7 Sep 1876 <<snip>> LOVELACE, Mollie R.& James B. BROWN; 7 Sep 1876 <<snip>>