I know who you are talking about. Elizabeth has a file full of data received from this individual and it is so full of errors that I refuse to use it. There is just so much that this person obviously just stuck together that I can't tell what is true and what is fiction. Figuring out the truth based on data received from different family members and from different generations is difficult enough. There is plenty of evidence to convince me that George did have two Joseph's in his home. Tracking them both down is the problem. Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [LOONEY-L] Joseph H. Looney > Larry: The two things that have always bothered me about George's missing > older Joseph is the info posted by one of our previous members that this > Joseph was buried in Bollinger Co., MO. He couldn't name his source but in > my picking apart of Bollinger Co. I know there were only two Looney family's > there. Mine at Zalma and the Arthur G. Looney family about 30 miles north of > there at Patton. Arthur's family is pretty well documented without a Joseph > in sight. > Joseph & Almeda apparently didn't use the "naming pattern" that was so > popular with many families. Or if they did they quit using after the first > two. What to do, what to do. Just keep digging I guess. At least I know > others are helping me dig. > Pat > > > ==== LOONEY Mailing List ==== > If you find a web page somewhere listing Manx, Irish or Scotch surnames > and they don't include LOONEY/LUNA/etc., send them a note to let them > know we're around. The more advertising we have, the more help we get. > >