This edition of the Law Notices contains the following entry: CHANCERY, LINCOLN'S-INN at half-past 10. [Before the LORDS JUSTICES] Lunatic petitions: Re Redmayne-Re King-Re Sombre-Re Rawlings-Re Saunders= Re rolleston-Re Scarpelain. Bankrupt petitiions(4). Appeal: Reimers v Druce, part heard. Can anyone say if this means that Redmayne was the subject of a petition or was presenting the petition? or can help interpret what this means ? Thank you Norman Jessup