--part1_0.14fdd0e8.257917a2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_0.14fdd0e8.257917a2_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <listadmin-bounces@rootsweb.com> Received: from rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (rly-yg01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.1]) by air-yg03.mail.aol.com (vx) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 19:55:02 1900 Received: from bl-11.rootsweb.com (bl-11.rootsweb.com [204.212.38.27]) by rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (v65.4) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 19:54:45 -0500 Received: (from slist@localhost) by bl-11.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA10467 for LITTLETON-admin@lists2.rootsweb.com; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:54:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:54:35 -0800 (PST) X-From_: vbuss@mail.trib.net Thu Dec 2 16:54:34 1999 Received: from bl-3.rootsweb.com (bl-3.rootsweb.com [204.212.38.19]) by bl-11.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10449 for <LITTLETON-L@lists2.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:54:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from trib1.trib.net (trib1.trib.net [12.10.112.1]) by bl-3.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19633 for <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:54:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from dialup3-10.trib.net (dialup3-10.trib.net [12.10.112.226]) by trib1.trib.net (NTMail 3.03.0017/4c.adoc) with ESMTP id ha785415 for <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 18:57:17 -0600 Message-ID: <000801bf3d29$1a074220$e2700a0c@oemcomputer> From: "Vicki Buss" <vbuss@mail.trib.net> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> References: <0A2A01079C9BD311A9D200105A1A16FB201D96@mail4.lee.k12.fl.us> <010701bf3cb1$7901c3e0$fb01fea9@workstation01> Old-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 18:53:23 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list Subject: {not a subscriber} Re: LITTLETON venting X-Envelope-To: LITTLETON-L Well, this certainly got us going! Tho I've not faced this particular experience in working on the family tree, I've faced it numerous times in my profession (clinical social worker)...someone calls, wanting to talk to someone in treatment, but I don't have that person's consent to share. Easy solution, I give a pat answer, telling about confidentiality, and volunteer to take the caller's name, phone and address, and if the callee should come in, I pass it on. Works beautifully. Tho, it is kind of onerous at times ("I KNOW MY SON/DAUGHTER/WIFE IS THERE, I TOOK THEM....") kind of responses, but most folks understand. As for the researchers that refuse to do this sort of thing, they shouldn't be doing any genealogy stuff, thats just being stupid and narrow minded. And as for not giving credit for someone else's research, I think that is called plagiarism legally. Just makes one want to give em wrong info. Anyhow, what goes around will eventually come around. ----- Original Message ----- From: charlotteken <charlotteken@email.msn.com> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:39 AM Subject: Re: LITTLETON List Apology! > Sorry all Littleton List, I sent TWO venting letters, I > > had too many things on my mind and forgot I already sent > > one, then it was too late! > > I was so upset and agreed with Terry, happy someone > > else had the same problems I was having.Seems the > > ones marked "Private" are the ones I am interested in! > > of course. > > Charlotte > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Littleton, Terry" <TerryLi@lee.k12.fl.us> > To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 6:55 AM > Subject: LITTLETONs in Vermont? > > > > Hi all, > > > > Has anyone ever come across any LITTLETONs that were in Vermont in the > early 1800's? Looking for any info that might pertain to a Samuel Littleton > that was supposedly in Vermont. > > > > To be honest, I have never seen any reference to Littletons being in that > particular state, but who knows. > > > > HOPE EVERYONE HAS A GREAT THANKSGIVING!! > > > > Terry Littleton (listdad) > > > > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > > > > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > --part1_0.14fdd0e8.257917a2_boundary--

I thought this was interesting.....Wish I had a molar to check <G> NATIVE AMERICAN ANCESTRY? - Ask your dentist! Do you have a family tradition that says one of your ancestors was a Native American? Well, the proof may be in your mouth and your dentist can tell you. A little bump on your maxillary first molars is called a "Carrabelli's Cusp." This is the sixth tooth from the center of your front upper teeth. People who are stricfly of western European origin have this bump on that tooth. People who have Native American (Indian) heritage are missing this cusp. The sides of the maxillary first molars will be smooth. Please note! People who are of Asian heritage will also be missing the cusp. This may be yet another proof that Native Americans originally came to the North American continent over a land bridge thousands of years ago. (Info via the Log, Ledger of Genealogy Quarterly Publication Volume 16, 3, West Virginia Genealogical Society, Inc., P.O. Box 249, Elkview, WV 25071, via Dr. Vernon Nesmith, DDS of Wichita Falls, TX. ******************************************************************* Researching: Weekley, Braman, Littleton, Jarrett/Jarard, Buchanan, Higgins, Tennant, O'Neil Barnhouse, Enoch, Pribble ----- Original Message ----- From: <LITTLETON-D-request@rootsweb.com> To: <LITTLETON-D@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:30 PM Subject: LITTLETON-D Digest V99 #107

As one of those who dropped out of the LDR (Lower Delmarva) list in support of Terry, I totally agree with him re sharing genealogical information with anyone who requests it. That's what we're all here for, or at least we should be, and I'm glad to see that other members of the Littleton list are supporting our hard-working "Listdad." BTW, I was appalled to hear that some schmuck has ripped off Brian Berry's masterful JOHN LITTLETON OF ACCOMACK CO., VA: HIS FAMILY AND DESCENDANTS (1999) without so much as a brief acknowledgment. That sort of thing is a big no-no in the academic world, and damn well should be in the genealogical world, too. I would never deny anyone any information about my Littleton (or Hotchkiss, Hazen, Toffey, etc.) kinfolk, living or dead, nor would I put a price on such information. But if what I pass along ends up being published, either in print or on the web, I would certainly expect to be acknowledged as a matter of common courtesy. In any case, Terry, ol' buddy, keep on venting! The vast majority of your Littleton cousins/fellow researchers are firmly in your corner! Cheers (& Happy Holidays to all!), Scott C. SCOTT LITTLETON "Any sufficiently evolved Professor of Anthropology technology is indistinguishable Occidental College from magic." Los Angeles, CA 90041 --Arthur C. Clarke TEL (323) 259-2759 FAX (323) 341-4969 "I think we're property...." http://www.oxy.edu/~yokatta/home.htm --Charles Fort

Somehow I missed the manuscript. Is it still for sale and would it include my Thomas Littleton from N.C. to S.C. to Ga. to La. to Texas? Probably not. Joyce TLTURBO@aol.com wrote: > Well if you all want to get real upset, I came acorss all the data from our > recently published LITTLETON Manuscript that Brian worked so hard on as part > of someones tree. I know it was ours because we are the only ones to have > figured out a lot of the connections. > > Unfortunately, I would bet it was someone on this list because they would > have had to buy the manuscript but I can't for the life of me, remember where > I saw it. > > And like most times that this happens, there was NO MENTION of who did all > the research and published the manuscript. > > Terry Littleton (listdad) > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com

I couldn't get all of the pages I needed to completely open, but this is a good site for anyone with ancestors in Clermont Co., OH in 1820. Jim Clanin ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wforgeron@aol.com> To: <OHCLERMO-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 7:10 PM Subject: 1820 Clermont County Census > http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/oh/clermont/census/1820/ > > Rootsweb Newsletter just mentioned this 1820 Census Warrene > > > ==== OHCLERMO Mailing List ==== > We Love Clermont > >

Terry and all, This is something to be watched for. In this case, I doubt there was an attempt to use the information for monitary gain. I corresponded with an individual about another family name and received very little info. from him but everytime I gave him anything, he wanted all the documentation It got to a point he was demanding about the documentation. As I found out through other means, he was an associate editor for a "Family Letter" published and distributed for a yearly price. He and the others in this publishing co. were making money off of other persons work. They were definately a for profit company. They advertise in Evertons. I have never had a problem giving what info I have. I can understand Companies, such as Family Tree Maker, for protecting the privacy of living individuals in the World Family Tree. They are open to law suits. My 2¢ also. Jim Clanin ----- Original Message ----- From: <TLTURBO@aol.com> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 6:01 PM Subject: Re: LITTLETON List Apology! > Well if you all want to get real upset, I came acorss all the data from our > recently published LITTLETON Manuscript that Brian worked so hard on as part > of someones tree. I know it was ours because we are the only ones to have > figured out a lot of the connections. > > Unfortunately, I would bet it was someone on this list because they would > have had to buy the manuscript but I can't for the life of me, remember where > I saw it. > > And like most times that this happens, there was NO MENTION of who did all > the research and published the manuscript. > > Terry Littleton (listdad) > > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > >

TERRY: I agree with you 100%, and then some. It is just inconceivable that there are such people, although I have experienced it in my searching on SCHOFIELD. My answer has always been "Well fine, that's your decision. However, did it ever occurr to you that the info which I have might fill in a few gaps in YOUR research. I'm quite sure that you must have several dead-ends". Don't let it get you down and just keep on lookin'!! Al Schofield

I agree with Terry. My whole purpose in being on the list is to do researach and I will help anyone that I can. I have given lots of info to a lot of people and will give any info in the future. I have had a lot of help. I belong to one list where I sent them tons of information that connected several hundred people, I had all of the Southern family and it was the key that connected the Southern and the East. I assumed I would get the family line. I have been told tht I can get what I sent in and the people tht are researching my "immediate" line as other people don't want their info given out. The listowner keeps sending out memos like "we" now have 10,000 people identified, etc. We don't have anything. I would hate to see this list turn into that sort of thing. Lets keep it open and sharing. Joyce

Well if you all want to get real upset, I came acorss all the data from our recently published LITTLETON Manuscript that Brian worked so hard on as part of someones tree. I know it was ours because we are the only ones to have figured out a lot of the connections. Unfortunately, I would bet it was someone on this list because they would have had to buy the manuscript but I can't for the life of me, remember where I saw it. And like most times that this happens, there was NO MENTION of who did all the research and published the manuscript. Terry Littleton (listdad)

Terry, I do share much of the sentiment of the others who have responded to your Email. It is discouraging when the info. exchange is one-sided; however, there are some issues of privacy that exist in doing genealogy research on the web. I agree that the circumstances that you mentioned, e.g. stalker, etc. are very remote. It is my understanding that one of the biggest concerns about sharing info about living persons is the threat of "cyber Thieves". There really are people who peruse obituaries and Genealogy forums looking for personal information to identify others. One of the most common "passwords" at banks and brokerages is a person's mother's maiden name. If a thief has stolen important mail (this has happened to me!) and has social security # info, bank acct info and address, etc., they can use the genealogy information to gain more access to an account. I think it is important to respect people's wishes about privacy (as frustrating as that can often be for us) and error on the side of caution if we don't know if that "cousin" wants their identity revealed. Here are a few of ways to deal with reluctant researchers: 1. Ask them if they are more comfortable mailing sensitive data about living individuals through the conventional mail - this keeps the info. off the NET and is significantly more "private". 2. Offer to mail them research data, sending a self-addressed stamped envelope. Some people are more trusting when they know how to find you! And they also feel guilty about not returning a favor. 3. Ask the researcher if they could be a "go-between" and contact that "cousin" to ask permission for you to make contact. I think our goal in those cases is to try to gain a person's trust - maybe over time - so that they will find a way to help us get the information we seek. Thanks for the Discussion! (maybe some time soon we can vent about citing sources!) Rick >TLTURBO@aol.com wrote: > > OK, you have never seen me get upset about anything but I am now. This > subject has come up several times lately so I thought I'd explain my position > on it to all of you. Mainly, to be blunt, the newsgroup sponsor can > establish just about any guidlines for their list. Since I sponsor this > list, here is my guiedline on this subject. > > I have never encountered anyone on this list that has ever refused to provide > another LITTLETON researcher with whatever help they can provide. I am very > proud of all of you for your professional, courtious behavior. But a > situation developed about a month ago that resulted in my being REMOVED from > another surname newsgroup for disagreeing with the phylosophy of that lists > sponsor about divulging information on living people. I am writing this, > because I just found an important link to a LITTLETON line and wrote the > person that provided the info asking for more than the persons name and was > refused the info because the person was still living. This person was NOT a > subscriber to this list. A LITTLETON married into their family line. > > Now this is MY opinion, and therefor that of this list. I feel the world is > entirely too paranoid. Granted, there is the remote possibility that an > enraged, ex-spouse or a stalker MIGHT use a genealogy list to locate a > person, but I feel that possibility is remote. The people I have disagreed > with feel they do not want to be held responsible for giving someone like > this information that could lead to problems. I feel this possibility is > extremely remote and does a great disservice to all genealogists that are > looking for ancestors. > > How many of you have I, or others on this list, put you in touch with other > living cousins that have provided a wealth of info on your family? Quite a > few. What if I had refused to tell you, "OH YEAH, I know where you fathers > missing brother lives but I won't tell you?" Wouldn't you feel very > frustrated? > > I got into an argument with the sponsor of the Lower DL, MD, VA newsgroup > about this subject and she subsequently removed me from the list. Several > other people unsubscribed in my behalf which I greatly appreciated, but I > felt it was totally against the research ideals of all genealogists. After > all, we look to the ends of the earth for information, then are deprived of > vital contacts just because a person we find and want to contact is living? > > In actuality, with this attitude, none of us should be talking to each other > since we are all living. > > OK, now you know how I feel. I want you to know that if will not tolerate > anyone withholding information from another researcher. BUT I will NOT > remove someone for doing that, as everyone has a right to this list unless > they become a trouble maker by flaming, etc. But if this happens to you, > please contact me and if I have the info, you will gladly receive it. > > Thanks for letting me vent and explain my stand on this issue. I understand > it has been tossed around quite a bit in the Genealogy community and opinions > vary. Seems like opinions are strongly one way or the other. > > If anyone has any comments, feel free to make them, but PLEASE, don't let > this deteriorate into an argument. > > ALSO, would someone PLEASE come to SW Florida and take this darn 40 degree > weather away? It's not good for my bananas and papayas. HA HA > > Hope everyone has a great Holiday Season > > Terry Littleton - listdad > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com

Hi Charlotte, Thanks for the response. I think I can see their point, but most of these people carry it to extremes. I told this lady I contacted last night that I was a LITTLETON, was sponsor of this newsgroup, and that who I was would be easy enough to verify by checking my e-mail address, writing to me, checking my address, etc. She wasn't even willing to contact this person and see if it was OK to give me their phone number or whatever or have them contact me. Now I will admit, that if Joe Blow from Kokomo wrote asking how to contact someone and I had a suspicion that he wasn't really a researcher, I'd take some steps to verify who he was and why before I gave out any info. Even though I have the address and phone number of quite a few people on this list, I don't give that out freely. I WILL give out e-mail addresses and anyone can use switchboard to find a listed phone number. OR, I'll get THEIR number and have the person they are looking for contact them if they want to. Who knows, this lady I wanted to reach might have been thrilled to be contacted by a distant cousin that could shed some light on her family ancestors. I guess it just part of the game, that those of us who try to be helpful, occasionally help those that aren't. Oh well Take care - Terry (listdad)

I agree that "all" info should be shared. I agree with one other venting person - maybe take the person's name, etc. and let the original researcher decide if they want to contact this person. I have been sharing gedcom files for years and recently saw my whole database on the family ancestor internet site with someone else's name on it. I know it was mine because of little notes that I had written on the individual's record. At first I was angry and then I decided that this is the reason we share. I would like to have had my name on it somewhere as a contributor, but some people take and don't want to share (anything). AND sources?? I have made every caution to provide sources for every individual in my files (these were also on the website). I have received a lot of info from people, though and I always check it out myself before putting it in my database. I would save a lot of time and effort if people would include sources with their info. Just my 2 cents worth. Happy Holidays! Joyce

Sorry all Littleton List, I sent TWO venting letters, I had too many things on my mind and forgot I already sent one, then it was too late! I was so upset and agreed with Terry, happy someone else had the same problems I was having.Seems the ones marked "Private" are the ones I am interested in! of course. Charlotte ----- Original Message ----- From: "Littleton, Terry" <TerryLi@lee.k12.fl.us> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 6:55 AM Subject: LITTLETONs in Vermont? > Hi all, > > Has anyone ever come across any LITTLETONs that were in Vermont in the early 1800's? Looking for any info that might pertain to a Samuel Littleton that was supposedly in Vermont. > > To be honest, I have never seen any reference to Littletons being in that particular state, but who knows. > > HOPE EVERYONE HAS A GREAT THANKSGIVING!! > > Terry Littleton (listdad) > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com >

OK, you have never seen me get upset about anything but I am now. This subject has come up several times lately so I thought I'd explain my position on it to all of you. Mainly, to be blunt, the newsgroup sponsor can establish just about any guidlines for their list. Since I sponsor this list, here is my guiedline on this subject. I have never encountered anyone on this list that has ever refused to provide another LITTLETON researcher with whatever help they can provide. I am very proud of all of you for your professional, courtious behavior. But a situation developed about a month ago that resulted in my being REMOVED from another surname newsgroup for disagreeing with the phylosophy of that lists sponsor about divulging information on living people. I am writing this, because I just found an important link to a LITTLETON line and wrote the person that provided the info asking for more than the persons name and was refused the info because the person was still living. This person was NOT a subscriber to this list. A LITTLETON married into their family line. Now this is MY opinion, and therefor that of this list. I feel the world is entirely too paranoid. Granted, there is the remote possibility that an enraged, ex-spouse or a stalker MIGHT use a genealogy list to locate a person, but I feel that possibility is remote. The people I have disagreed with feel they do not want to be held responsible for giving someone like this information that could lead to problems. I feel this possibility is extremely remote and does a great disservice to all genealogists that are looking for ancestors. How many of you have I, or others on this list, put you in touch with other living cousins that have provided a wealth of info on your family? Quite a few. What if I had refused to tell you, "OH YEAH, I know where you fathers missing brother lives but I won't tell you?" Wouldn't you feel very frustrated? I got into an argument with the sponsor of the Lower DL, MD, VA newsgroup about this subject and she subsequently removed me from the list. Several other people unsubscribed in my behalf which I greatly appreciated, but I felt it was totally against the research ideals of all genealogists. After all, we look to the ends of the earth for information, then are deprived of vital contacts just because a person we find and want to contact is living? In actuality, with this attitude, none of us should be talking to each other since we are all living. OK, now you know how I feel. I want you to know that if will not tolerate anyone withholding information from another researcher. BUT I will NOT remove someone for doing that, as everyone has a right to this list unless they become a trouble maker by flaming, etc. But if this happens to you, please contact me and if I have the info, you will gladly receive it. Thanks for letting me vent and explain my stand on this issue. I understand it has been tossed around quite a bit in the Genealogy community and opinions vary. Seems like opinions are strongly one way or the other. If anyone has any comments, feel free to make them, but PLEASE, don't let this deteriorate into an argument. ALSO, would someone PLEASE come to SW Florida and take this darn 40 degree weather away? It's not good for my bananas and papayas. HA HA Hope everyone has a great Holiday Season Terry Littleton - listdad

Dear Littleton Cousin, Thank you for sharing your frustrations that I feel also! Can you tell me why the ones who mark their files "Private" and won't share their information, are also on OUR LISTS THAT DO?? They TAKE but don't give! Wish we could vent to them all and let them know how we feel and why should we share with them and allow them to take? On the LDS Family Ancestry File, there is a statement we sign that promises we will share what we have and are willing to help others. I thought that's what this is all about. Thank you for letting me vent also! Charlotte Kendrick

Dear Littleton cousin, I agree 100% with you, wish there was something we could do about this as I come across this all the time, they refuse to share their information with us, yet THEY ARE ON OUR LISTS using OUR information! Thank you for letting me VENT! Charlotte Kendrick ----- Original Message ----- From: <TLTURBO@aol.com> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 6:07 AM Subject: I HAVE TO VENT!!! > OK, you have never seen me get upset about anything but I am now. This > subject has come up several times lately so I thought I'd explain my position > on it to all of you. Mainly, to be blunt, the newsgroup sponsor can > establish just about any guidlines for their list. Since I sponsor this > list, here is my guiedline on this subject. > > I have never encountered anyone on this list that has ever refused to provide > another LITTLETON researcher with whatever help they can provide. I am very > proud of all of you for your professional, courtious behavior. But a > situation developed about a month ago that resulted in my being REMOVED from > another surname newsgroup for disagreeing with the phylosophy of that lists > sponsor about divulging information on living people. I am writing this, > because I just found an important link to a LITTLETON line and wrote the > person that provided the info asking for more than the persons name and was > refused the info because the person was still living. This person was NOT a > subscriber to this list. A LITTLETON married into their family line. > > Now this is MY opinion, and therefor that of this list. I feel the world is > entirely too paranoid. Granted, there is the remote possibility that an > enraged, ex-spouse or a stalker MIGHT use a genealogy list to locate a > person, but I feel that possibility is remote. The people I have disagreed > with feel they do not want to be held responsible for giving someone like > this information that could lead to problems. I feel this possibility is > extremely remote and does a great disservice to all genealogists that are > looking for ancestors. > > How many of you have I, or others on this list, put you in touch with other > living cousins that have provided a wealth of info on your family? Quite a > few. What if I had refused to tell you, "OH YEAH, I know where you fathers > missing brother lives but I won't tell you?" Wouldn't you feel very > frustrated? > > I got into an argument with the sponsor of the Lower DL, MD, VA newsgroup > about this subject and she subsequently removed me from the list. Several > other people unsubscribed in my behalf which I greatly appreciated, but I > felt it was totally against the research ideals of all genealogists. After > all, we look to the ends of the earth for information, then are deprived of > vital contacts just because a person we find and want to contact is living? > > In actuality, with this attitude, none of us should be talking to each other > since we are all living. > > OK, now you know how I feel. I want you to know that if will not tolerate > anyone withholding information from another researcher. BUT I will NOT > remove someone for doing that, as everyone has a right to this list unless > they become a trouble maker by flaming, etc. But if this happens to you, > please contact me and if I have the info, you will gladly receive it. > > Thanks for letting me vent and explain my stand on this issue. I understand > it has been tossed around quite a bit in the Genealogy community and opinions > vary. Seems like opinions are strongly one way or the other. > > If anyone has any comments, feel free to make them, but PLEASE, don't let > this deteriorate into an argument. > > ALSO, would someone PLEASE come to SW Florida and take this darn 40 degree > weather away? It's not good for my bananas and papayas. HA HA > > Hope everyone has a great Holiday Season > > Terry Littleton - listdad > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com >

Ona, I have no record of a Casandra Littleton or Thomas Jefferson Rice. However, I will keep you in mind for any future find. Jim Clanin, > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <RAtki54168@aol.com> > To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 10:22 AM > Subject: Illinois Connections?? > > > > Does anyone out there researching the Littletons of Illinois have any > > knowledge of or have on their family tree by the name of Casandra > Littleton. > > She was B in Ill. in about 1824 city unk. She was my gggrandmother and I > > cannot find anything else about her. She M. Thomas Jefferson Rice about > 1840 > > in Illinois. Please Help !!!! Thanks for your time. Ona > > > > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > > > > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > >

I am sorry, I do not have that name, but will keep it in mind along with your email. My Littleton's were in Fulton Co. IL 1829 or sooner until about the Civil War. Then Sullivan Co. MO Names: Robert Ezra Brown Sr. bn 1820 IL Mary Susan Littleton bn Peoria IL 1835 ----- Original Message ----- From: <RAtki54168@aol.com> To: <LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 10:22 AM Subject: Illinois Connections?? > Does anyone out there researching the Littletons of Illinois have any > knowledge of or have on their family tree by the name of Casandra Littleton. > She was B in Ill. in about 1824 city unk. She was my gggrandmother and I > cannot find anything else about her. She M. Thomas Jefferson Rice about 1840 > in Illinois. Please Help !!!! Thanks for your time. Ona > > > ==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== > LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com >

Terry I am just glad they had something to eat so we all got here. Happy Thanksgiving. Harry At 11:21 AM 11/24/99 -0500, you wrote: >I hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving. > >Stop and think about what your ancestors might have had to eat and how they celebrated back in the 1700's and 1800's. > >Don't eat too much - Terry (listdad) > > >==== LITTLETON Mailing List ==== >LITTLETON-L@rootsweb.com > >

I hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving. Stop and think about what your ancestors might have had to eat and how they celebrated back in the 1700's and 1800's. Don't eat too much - Terry (listdad)