Darrell, And I didn't refer to anyone in particular, because I was remarking on the general tone of late. As to "wacko" -- I once saw a sign that said something to the effect of "Normal people are just those you don't know very well. I resemble that remark . . . On 3/10/2012 10:44 AM, Darrell A. Martin wrote: > Nan: > > I think both Jim and Janet behaved just fine. Jim didn't say he thought > Janet was up to no good, he just wondered whether complying with the > request was appropriate. Janet, as you said, simply made a request to a > few admins, privately. When her request was discussed here on LO, she > dropped us all a line to give us more information. Nothing out of the > ordinary in any of this, in fact a commendably polite exchange. > > For that matter, I think your own observation about overly sensitive > posts to LO was also fine. I agree with it. It just doesn't apply to Jim > or Janet in this case. I would add that one of the purposes of LO is to > discuss just such issues.... If nothing else it helps me to keep track > of what is going on with other lists, even if I think everyone on here > is wacko except me (and I have very strong suspicions about me). ;) > > Darrell > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LISTOWNERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message