We are still working on it but I suspect the A/V software as well since not all the messages are flagged with the [SUSPECTED SPAM] subject line so some get through. Yvonne On May 21, 2012, at 12:00 AM, listowners-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 14:13:20 -0400 > From: "David E. Cann" <decann@infionline.net> > Subject: Re: [LO] [SUSPECTED SPAM] in Subject LIne > To: "Listowners List Posting" <listowners@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <001b01cd36b4$3d71be10$b8553a30$@net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I'm almost positive I agree with you Joan, but I'm not familiar enough with > Norton to say with any real certainty. I use McAfee Total Protection, and I > had a similar problem myself until I finally disabled that feature because > of the "false positives" (reporting "possible" spam) and completely > eliminated the problem. My ISP has excellent and very efficient spam > filters anyway, and they "whitelist" RW mail, so much as I like McAfee > itself, shutting off its built-in spam protection cured the problem of false > positives without losing any spam protection at all. > > > David E. Cann > decann@infionline.net > or on Skype at "david.e.cann" > > > -----Original Message----- > From: listowners-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:listowners-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of JYoung6180@aol.com > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:03 PM > To: DianaGM@dgmweb.net; Listowners-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LO] [SUSPECTED SPAM] in Subject LIne > > I think so too...and I sort of doubt this is being reported to the ISP as > being spam and, hence, possibly harming RootsWeb. It is more likely that it > is just a cautionary warning to the subscriber as noted below. I don't know > > if adding the list address to the address book or whitelisting it would > help since these (spam) subject lines usually come up in a reply and the > original poster's address is most likely the one that raised the warning > from > the AV program or individual spam filters. > > Joan > > <snip>