Yes. AT&T stopped accepting mail from RootsWeb.com around mid August. AT&T includes att.net, sbcglobal.net, swbell.net, and probably some others owned by AT&T that don't come to mind right now. I have complained three times to AT&T but it had no effect. I had to change all of my list subscriptions and list ownerships in order to get list and administrative mail. Pat Asher (who used to use pjroots@att.net for list mail) At 11:11 AM 9/28/2018, DVHH Mailing List Administrator wrote: >Hello everyone, > >We have a list member who uses the ISP @sbcglobal.net, who is not receiving >posts. I tried unsubscribing her and re-subscribing her. She didn't even >get the welcome email. She belongs to another email list through Rootsweb, >the BANAT list and is not receiving posts from there either. >I have about 20 other list members who use this ISP. I have emailed them >directly from my admin/owner email address and so far have not received any >responses, except a couple of non-deliverable notifications. > >She also sent an email to donauschwaben-villages-admin@rootsweb.com, which >should have gone to 4 different email addresses, but was not received by >any of them. I tested sending to this address separately from my DVHH >member email address and everyone got it. > >Has anyone else had any issues with this ISP? or similar problems recently?

I am NOT an expert at this sort of issue and do not pretend to be, but in 20+ years as a list admin I have run into this sort of thing more than a couple of times including at least once when my own ISP (Earthlink) took to banning RootsWeb's domain supposedly as "a spammer." I called them (my ISP) as a subscriber and told them RW is not a spammer and complained to them as clearly as I could without (I hope) turning my own ISP against me. However, I think what did the most good was when SOMEONE IN AUTHORITY contacted the ISP each time and was told what the specific issue was "professional to professional" so they could resolve the issue between them. Usually, it took a few days for us to see the end results but they never were able to tell us what "tweaks and settings" had to be changed, so I cannot go into any details on that. Keep in mind that with all of the changes, upgrades and other things going on at RW right now, service providers sometimes react thinking they are blocking spam or the like and what they do does not always mesh well with RW being a legitimate mass mailer. I know I am not explaining this well because I don't entirely understand it myself, but someone in RW Tech Support needs to contact someone at AT&T (if they are the company blocking RW) and work it out "mano y mano" between themselves. David -----Original Message----- From: Pat Asher <pasher@ee.net> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 11:39 AM To: Listowners list for Rootsweb list admins and moderators <listowners@rootsweb.com> Cc: annerootsweb@gmail.com Subject: [LO] Re: ISP @sbcglobal.net - not receiving posts Yes. AT&T stopped accepting mail from RootsWeb.com around mid August. AT&T includes att.net, sbcglobal.net, swbell.net, and probably some others owned by AT&T that don't come to mind right now. I have complained three times to AT&T but it had no effect. I had to change all of my list subscriptions and list ownerships in order to get list and administrative mail. Pat Asher (who used to use pjroots@att.net for list mail) At 11:11 AM 9/28/2018, DVHH Mailing List Administrator wrote: >Hello everyone, > >We have a list member who uses the ISP @sbcglobal.net, who is not >receiving posts. I tried unsubscribing her and re-subscribing her. >She didn't even get the welcome email. She belongs to another email >list through Rootsweb, the BANAT list and is not receiving posts from there either. >I have about 20 other list members who use this ISP. I have emailed >them directly from my admin/owner email address and so far have not >received any responses, except a couple of non-deliverable notifications. > >She also sent an email to donauschwaben-villages-admin@rootsweb.com, >which should have gone to 4 different email addresses, but was not >received by any of them. I tested sending to this address separately >from my DVHH member email address and everyone got it. > >Has anyone else had any issues with this ISP? or similar problems recently?