Suggest as Anne has advised that you can copy the address in the held post. Rather than reject. Just write the person a simple message explaining the post caught and why and ask them to re post with out using reject. Just a thought. Dan On Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 5:25 AM Nivard Ovington <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have advised my subscribers of the problem we have, in that we have no > facility to reject with a reason for that rejection > > Further advising them to be careful of what they post (ie no full digest > etc), re subject line and copied back content and to use the correct > email address as I may not be able to give a reason for rejection > > And should a post not appear on the list, to check thoroughly the > address they used is subscribed and content, then re-post if needed > > They need to take responsibility if we don't have the tools to do the job > > For all the spam it doesn't matter, discard and done > > But will judge each held post on its merits and reject or discard > accordingly > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 17-Apr-18 10:45 PM, Lynne wrote: > > Please put that on the list of things to change. We need to be able to > > easily tell someone why his/her post is being rejected. Writing a note > > after the rejection is a waste of our time when we know we can both > > reject the post and give a reason for it at one time via MailMan. > > > > Lynne > > > > > > On 4/17/2018 11:10 AM, Anne Gillespie Mitchell wrote: > >> Changing reject to allow you to add a note is not currently on the > >> list of > >> things to change. > >> > >> You can send a note if you like after you reject the message. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Sure, you can copy the address and paste it into your e-mail client and then type a message, which will have to be longer because it will have to explain why you're typing it. More time-consuming than being able just to add a line in the 'reject' notification, *and* the poor subscriber gets two messages, one saying his/her post has been rejected and another saying why, instead of just one message. That's untidy and cumbersome. I shall look forward to it being fixed eventually, if I'm spared that long. Anne ANGUS List Administrator -----Original Message----- From: Dan M [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 April 2018 15:28 To: Listowners List Posting Subject: [LO]Re: message reject Suggest as Anne has advised that you can copy the address in the held post. Rather than reject. Just write the person a simple message explaining the post caught and why and ask them to re post with out using reject. Just a thought. Dan On Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 5:25 AM Nivard Ovington <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have advised my subscribers of the problem we have, in that we have > no facility to reject with a reason for that rejection > > Further advising them to be careful of what they post (ie no full > digest etc), re subject line and copied back content and to use the > correct email address as I may not be able to give a reason for > rejection > > And should a post not appear on the list, to check thoroughly the > address they used is subscribed and content, then re-post if needed > > They need to take responsibility if we don't have the tools to do the > job > > For all the spam it doesn't matter, discard and done > > But will judge each held post on its merits and reject or discard > accordingly > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 17-Apr-18 10:45 PM, Lynne wrote: > > Please put that on the list of things to change. We need to be able > > to easily tell someone why his/her post is being rejected. Writing > > a note after the rejection is a waste of our time when we know we > > can both reject the post and give a reason for it at one time via MailMan. > > > > Lynne > > > > > > On 4/17/2018 11:10 AM, Anne Gillespie Mitchell wrote: > >> Changing reject to allow you to add a note is not currently on the > >> list of things to change. > >> > >> You can send a note if you like after you reject the message. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected] > b.com/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal > RootsWeb community > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

I have been going down that track since the lists came back up !! But we should not have to do that, it should not be necessary to jump through hoops when it should be a facility to use As I said, I shall judge each held post on a case by case basis but subscribers need to take responsibility for their actions too Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 18-Apr-18 3:28 PM, Dan M wrote: > Suggest as Anne has advised that you can copy the address in the held > post. Rather than reject. Just write the person a simple message > explaining the post caught and why and ask them to re post with out using > reject. > Just a thought. > Dan

The only ones I’ve had to reject were the obvious spammers and phishing attempts. And it doesn’t bother me one bit to not have a reason to reject them...???? Sent from my iPad > On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct the > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to give a > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part as > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made me > look bad because the reject reason was blank. > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going > to be known its not serived like it should be? > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need more >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. >> >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) that >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a way to >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. >> >> Anne >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. >>> >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. >>> >>> We all make mistakes at times! >>> >>> Valorie >>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a >>> reason. >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got >>> grilled > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct the > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to give a > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part as > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made me > look bad because the reject reason was blank. > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going > to be known its not serived like it should be? > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need more >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. >> >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) that >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a way to >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. >> >> Anne >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. >>> >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. >>> >>> We all make mistakes at times! >>> >>> Valorie >>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a >>> reason. >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got >>> grilled >>>> by the member because it was not in the reject. >>>> I ticked the message to reject, clicked reject, it was gone. Poof! >>>> Dan >>> >>> -- >>> http://about.me/valoriez >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >>> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: https://lists.rootsweb >> . >>> ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >>> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >>> >>> View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb. >>> ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >>> >>> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. >>> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >>> >>> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >>> community >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Anne Mitchell >> >> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://finding-forgotten-stories.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >> >> View the archives for this list at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >> >> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. >> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >> >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community >> > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

I hope you mean discard them Never reject a spam post Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 17-Apr-18 8:33 PM, Sue Ashby wrote: > The only ones I’ve had to reject were the obvious spammers and phishing attempts. And it doesn’t bother me one bit to not have a reason to reject them...???? >

Well, I did the first two, before I realized what I was doing wrong. But, the others yes, I did discard.. so, far no repercussions on the rejected ones. Sent from my iPad > On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Nivard Ovington <[email protected]> wrote: > > I hope you mean discard them > > Never reject a spam post > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > >> On 17-Apr-18 8:33 PM, Sue Ashby wrote: >> The only ones I’ve had to reject were the obvious spammers and phishing attempts. And it doesn’t bother me one bit to not have a reason to reject them...???? > > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Should never reject spam. They had no clue it hit our boards. Should only defer those. You are just sending your contact to spammers directly. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 12:34 PM Sue Ashby <[email protected]> wrote: > The only ones I’ve had to reject were the obvious spammers and phishing > attempts. And it doesn’t bother me one bit to not have a reason to reject > them...???? > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct > the > > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. > > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to give > a > > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part as > > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made > me > > look bad because the reject reason was blank. > > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going > > to be known its not serived like it should be? > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need > more > >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. > >> > >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) that > >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a > way to > >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. > >> > >> Anne > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you > >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. > >>> > >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it > >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject > >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. > >>> > >>> We all make mistakes at times! > >>> > >>> Valorie > >>> > >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a > >>> reason. > >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got > >>> grilled > > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct > the > > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. > > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to give > a > > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part as > > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made > me > > look bad because the reject reason was blank. > > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going > > to be known its not serived like it should be? > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need > more > >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. > >> > >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) that > >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a > way to > >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. > >> > >> Anne > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you > >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. > >>> > >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it > >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject > >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. > >>> > >>> We all make mistakes at times! > >>> > >>> Valorie > >>> > >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a > >>> reason. > >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got > >>> grilled > >>>> by the member because it was not in the reject. > >>>> I ticked the message to reject, clicked reject, it was gone. Poof! > >>>> Dan > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://about.me/valoriez > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > >>> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb > >> . > >>> ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > >>> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > >>> > >>> View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb. > >>> ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > >>> > >>> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more > information. > >>> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > >>> > >>> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > >>> community > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Anne Mitchell > >> > >> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://finding-forgotten-stories.com> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > >> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > >> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > >> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > >> > >> View the archives for this list at: > >> > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > >> > >> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more > information. > >> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > >> > >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > >> community > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Also the page is incomplete with out that field may as well removed the option if its not going to do what it should. I don't think I am the only one who noticed but I did only use it once to find out its defeating its reason. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 1:07 PM Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: > Should never reject spam. They had no clue it hit our boards. > Should only defer those. > You are just sending your contact to spammers directly. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 12:34 PM Sue Ashby <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The only ones I’ve had to reject were the obvious spammers and phishing >> attempts. And it doesn’t bother me one bit to not have a reason to reject >> them...???? >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> > On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct >> the >> > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. >> > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to >> give a >> > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part >> as >> > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made >> me >> > look bad because the reject reason was blank. >> > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going >> > to be known its not serived like it should be? >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need >> more >> >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. >> >> >> >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) >> that >> >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a >> way to >> >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. >> >> >> >> Anne >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you >> >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. >> >>> >> >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it >> >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject >> >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. >> >>> >> >>> We all make mistakes at times! >> >>> >> >>> Valorie >> >>> >> >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a >> >>> reason. >> >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got >> >>> grilled >> > Well I agree 100% on (good content) and I would send it on and correct >> the >> > subject line. However it was a (me here to) message. >> > I do not use the reject ever. This was supposed to have a place to >> give a >> > reason for the reject before sending. It did not. Please fix that part >> as >> > with out it that feature is moot. The member sent me what he got. Made >> me >> > look bad because the reject reason was blank. >> > Also would like to make note if we don't use something how is it going >> > to be known its not serived like it should be? >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:50 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I agree 100% with Valorie. Don't reject good content! The lists need >> more >> >> good content. Nitpicking is the way to get there. >> >> >> >> I've seen lists like APG (Association of Professional Genealogists) >> that >> >> publish the rules for the list every 1st of the month. It might be a >> way to >> >> engage your lists and explain what good netiquette is. >> >> >> >> Anne >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you >> >>> say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. >> >>> >> >>> Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it >> >>> is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject >> >>> line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. >> >>> >> >>> We all make mistakes at times! >> >>> >> >>> Valorie >> >>> >> >>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Dan M <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I did reject a message with no subject, there was no way to put in a >> >>> reason. >> >>>> I did send a private note following the reject, how ever still got >> >>> grilled >> >>>> by the member because it was not in the reject. >> >>>> I ticked the message to reject, clicked reject, it was gone. Poof! >> >>>> Dan >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> http://about.me/valoriez >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >> >>> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: >> https://lists.rootsweb >> >> . >> >>> ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >> >>> >> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >> >>> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >> >>> >> >>> View the archives for this list at: https://lists.rootsweb. >> >>> ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >> >>> >> >>> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >> >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more >> information. >> >>> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >> >>> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >> >>> >> >>> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal >> RootsWeb >> >>> community >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anne Mitchell >> >> >> >> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://finding-forgotten-stories.com> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >> >> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: >> >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >> >> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >> >> >> >> View the archives for this list at: >> >> >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >> >> >> >> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >> >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more >> information. >> >> Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >> >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >> >> >> >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> >> community >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >> > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >> > >> > View the archives for this list at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >> > >> > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more >> information. Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >> > >> > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb >> Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailto:[email protected] >> ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe >> >> View the archives for this list at: >> https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ >> >> Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more >> information. Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions >> https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions >> >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community >> >

Valorie Over the many years I have always posted to my groups how to use a good subject line. That is noted; so we move on to the ( Hi folks our lists are working) and a flurry of ( me too and I  am here etc)   I already posted that I would not use the reject in a few posts back. How ever, the message was caught, was not good topic, and it looked like a fair time to try a tool I don't use. And don't plan to. How ever, since it needs some fenness maybe it was a good thing and staff folks ( could say ) thanks Dan for brining it up, rather than the put downs.  Sever admins and me talk in private, in part is because every time we post top the list we get or got, some sort of flare and shot down the chute, or in the past, * fly swatted * for even writing to the list any thing ?   As thats a well know topic,, it was why the other lo got started on yahoo and rootsweb other LO list. Its way I stopped posting all together and I guess since my messages and getting that unwelcome feel, maybe I will again stop. Far as good content, I try to keep my posts on some sort of topic like other admins, we ( know) ver 3 is going to be different, we know we can't bring back the past and what we are used to, but we also would like to be heard if we ask a question that seems moot, might be a reason we asked it. Like ( how do  you subscribe some one) on the page it could say ( for all subscribing) or something.   I do read and follow reason. But not excuses.   You want good content? We admins are free help and are only trying to comply to get things going smoothly. We can't responsibly answer members if we don't ask even stupid questions. Mailman 3 is different. Anne does not have it easy, what they are doing is not easy- she said she is having problems and was honest about it pulling from the wrong fields - we all need to give each other some latitude here.   So, folks, it just seems if we all work together, even if things don't seem to happen, chill and tell some one, ( I  changed this, and it had no effect) from there, let the inside people find time to fix it. Some fixing might be global.   I can say, one thing; any one who thinks they can install mailman with out any help go for it.  I looked at my old messages, I been here since fall 1997 I am not against any one, just trying to be a part of the lo family. Dan On 04/16/2018 04:37 PM, Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > I don't like losing the ability to put in a reason. However, as you > say a workaround is to copy/paste into a private email. > > Not sure I would reject for the lack of a subject line if otherwise it > is a good post. I guess I would tend to reply with a *good* subject > line so that it's easier to find in the archives and leave it at that. > > We all make mistakes at times! > > Valorie > >