Diana Gale Matthiesen wrote: > A thank you to those who've responded to me offlist. I've accepted > pretty much all of your suggestions, and my FAQ list is definitely the > better for it. One odd thing... > > There is one response to me that was onlist - I can see it in the > archive - but I never received a copy, so I can't simply "Reply" to The copy sent to your address, as shown in the original message, bounced :Not accepting mail from this user. Since it did, this one is going only to the list. [snip] > I'm responding to your message, in part, because I'm afraid I don't > understand this phrase: > > "...and could be it's because the first few times the phrase appears > ON SCREEN several places at once." > > Could you please explain? It's been 24 hours and without looking again -- I believe it was in FAQ #1 or #2 -- the phrase "...in fact..." was stairstepped, one above the other on two succeeding lines. This is a problem because it encourages the eye of the reader to skip whatever is between the two instances. Particularly problematic, since it appeared a third time in the NEXT paragraph/FAQ which _could_ lead a reader to skip several sentences. Obviously this could be due to my screen settings or my browser, but surely I'm not unique in that combination, so I was subtly suggesting that two of those "...in fact..." be removed to avoid causing a misunderstanding. Your FAQ of course. Cheryl