If you want to resubscribe somebody, it would be just like subscribing a new person. Go to Settings then Mass Operations, then Mass Subscribe. Then type in the name and then save. On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Nivard Ovington <[email protected]> wrote: > PS. I can't see how people who had unsubscribed could be subscribed back > > It would surely have happened with all lists, which as far as I can see > hasn't happened > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > On 01-May-18 9:45 PM, Tina Vickery wrote: >> >>> Hoping someone can help me. I am a smart girl, but for the life of >>> me, I cannot figure out how to unsub people from mailing lists I >>> manage. I am not sure what happened, but when the mailing lists came >>> back, they were populated with folks that had been unsubbed for years. >>> Thanks for any assistance, I am frustrated. >>> >>> Tina Vickery >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/listowne > [email protected]/ > > Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/listowne > [email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > -- Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com>

It is buried down a couple of layers. To unsubscribe people, go to your Members tab. Then find the person, you may have to search members. Then check the box next to them and click on Unsubscribe selected. If they aren't on the list, they managed to get unsubscribed on their own. Anne On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Tina Vickery <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoping someone can help me. I am a smart girl, but for the life of > me, I cannot figure out how to unsub people from mailing lists I > manage. I am not sure what happened, but when the mailing lists came > back, they were populated with folks that had been unsubbed for years. > Thanks for any assistance, I am frustrated. > > Tina Vickery > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/ > [email protected]/ > > Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > [email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > -- Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com>

PS. I can't see how people who had unsubscribed could be subscribed back It would surely have happened with all lists, which as far as I can see hasn't happened Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > On 01-May-18 9:45 PM, Tina Vickery wrote: >> Hoping someone can help me.  I am a smart girl, but for the life of >> me, I cannot figure out how to unsub people from mailing lists I >> manage.  I am not sure what happened, but when the mailing lists came >> back, they were populated with folks that had been unsubbed for years. >> Thanks for any assistance, I am frustrated. >> >> Tina Vickery >

I assume you have registered/re-registered with Rootsweb Go to your admin page of the list in question Select Members Search for or select the email address of the person you want to unsubscribe Enter a tick in the box next to the email address(es) and select Unsubscribe Selected Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 01-May-18 9:45 PM, Tina Vickery wrote: > Hoping someone can help me. I am a smart girl, but for the life of > me, I cannot figure out how to unsub people from mailing lists I > manage. I am not sure what happened, but when the mailing lists came > back, they were populated with folks that had been unsubbed for years. > Thanks for any assistance, I am frustrated. > > Tina Vickery

Hoping someone can help me. I am a smart girl, but for the life of me, I cannot figure out how to unsub people from mailing lists I manage. I am not sure what happened, but when the mailing lists came back, they were populated with folks that had been unsubbed for years. Thanks for any assistance, I am frustrated. Tina Vickery

Whoooo hoo! Thanks! Anne Gillespie Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > >You can now set a limit for message size. ><snip>

Anne, Yes, I have found that setting and am experimenting with a few digest settings in that respect. I have some digests set as low as 10kb, but any benefit to be had in that respect is very minimal thus far if any at all. Glad to hear they might be considering reinstating the old 24 hour (or even 48) scheduling. I for one hope it is returned. David E. Cann [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Anne Gillespie Mitchell <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 10:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [LO]Message size threshold You can now set a limit for message size. Digest size threshold is for when the digest is sent out. (We are looking at options for doing it daily.) Messages size threshold will hold all messages of a certain size for approval. A value of 0 means unlimited -- NOT RECOMMENDED. Anne

Thankyou Anne ;) On 05/01/2018 07:52 AM, Anne Gillespie Mitchell wrote: > You can now set a limit for message size. > > Digest size threshold is for when the digest is sent out. (We are looking > at options for doing it daily.) > > Messages size threshold will hold all messages of a certain size for > approval. A value of 0 means unlimited -- NOT RECOMMENDED. >

You can now set a limit for message size. Digest size threshold is for when the digest is sent out. (We are looking at options for doing it daily.) Messages size threshold will hold all messages of a certain size for approval. A value of 0 means unlimited -- NOT RECOMMENDED. Anne

I like to use BCC when sending duplicate messages out to multiple lists. Saves lots of time and trouble and, unlike CCs, I don't have to worry about subscribers replying to a lot of lists to which they're not subscribed. It also allows me the option to delete the held BCC if I've found an error in the message. Just wanted to let every one know that I found out today that Accept Immediately, the setting we were told to use to avoid receiving the dreaded not posted for N/A, does exactly what it says and even releases BCCs. If you use BCCs you might want to rethink Accept Immediately. Lynne

You mentioned there are not enough messages on a list to trigger the digest. On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 4:58 PM David E. Cann <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan & Anne, > > Thank you for the reply Dan, but that doesn't answer my ORIGINAL question > in > this thread. Have we : > > "Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of our > routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did overnight > with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been reached? > As > it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a > single > digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list posts > arrive > to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for the list. This is > crazy. At a time when the average list is on the brink of being "dead and > buried" already because of past operation issues and errors, to isolate > digest users like this is NOT going to be helpful and will only make things > worse in the long run." > > Anne --> IS THE DAILY DIGEST THAT WE HAD IN MAILMAN 2.17 now gone forever, > or is it something else on the Engineers' "to do list" to be fixed??? > > > David E. Cann > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan M <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 7:00 PM > To: Listowners List Posting <[email protected]> > Subject: [LO]Re: Digest posting frequency > > On a slow list you might suggest folks dont use digest . > Be nice to have a busy list but I don't have any for sure. > I have never used it as admin either. > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 2:16 PM David E. Cann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of > > our routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did > > overnight with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been > reached? > > As > > it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a > > single digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list > > posts arrive to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for > > the list. This is crazy. At a time when the average list is on the > > brink of being "dead and buried" already because of past operation > > issues and errors, to isolate digest users like this is NOT going to > > be helpful and will only make things worse in the long run. > > > > Personally, I have never been a great supporter of the digest option > > at all for a number of reasons, but so long as the subscribers DO seem > > to like it, then it seems to me we that effectively stretching out the > > delivery of a digest potentially FOR WEEKS OR LONGER needs to be > > reconsidered, and the supplemental daily delivery of the digest we > > used to have should be reconsidered and returned. Can anyone reading > > this is aware of a digest delivery schedule such as we had in Mailman > > 2.17 is NOT gone as seems apparent now, then please advise. If > > Mailman 2.17 could do it, why can't Mailman 3.0??? > > > > > > David > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/[email protected]/ > > Archives: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Dan & Anne, Thank you for the reply Dan, but that doesn't answer my ORIGINAL question in this thread. Have we : "Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of our routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did overnight with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been reached? As it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a single digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list posts arrive to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for the list. This is crazy. At a time when the average list is on the brink of being "dead and buried" already because of past operation issues and errors, to isolate digest users like this is NOT going to be helpful and will only make things worse in the long run." Anne --> IS THE DAILY DIGEST THAT WE HAD IN MAILMAN 2.17 now gone forever, or is it something else on the Engineers' "to do list" to be fixed??? David E. Cann [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Dan M <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 7:00 PM To: Listowners List Posting <[email protected]> Subject: [LO]Re: Digest posting frequency On a slow list you might suggest folks dont use digest . Be nice to have a busy list but I don't have any for sure. I have never used it as admin either. On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 2:16 PM David E. Cann <[email protected]> wrote: > Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of > our routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did > overnight with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been reached? > As > it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a > single digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list > posts arrive to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for > the list. This is crazy. At a time when the average list is on the > brink of being "dead and buried" already because of past operation > issues and errors, to isolate digest users like this is NOT going to > be helpful and will only make things worse in the long run. > > Personally, I have never been a great supporter of the digest option > at all for a number of reasons, but so long as the subscribers DO seem > to like it, then it seems to me we that effectively stretching out the > delivery of a digest potentially FOR WEEKS OR LONGER needs to be > reconsidered, and the supplemental daily delivery of the digest we > used to have should be reconsidered and returned. Can anyone reading > this is aware of a digest delivery schedule such as we had in Mailman > 2.17 is NOT gone as seems apparent now, then please advise. If > Mailman 2.17 could do it, why can't Mailman 3.0??? > > > David > >

I’ve got someone working on it On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:30 PM Lynne <[email protected]> wrote: > Nivard, did you ever get an answer to this? All of a sudden I'm getting > posts rejected from LancsGen with notations that posts are being held > because they exceed 11KB. I'm not sure where the 11KB came from because my > recollection is that LancsGen was set for 9.5 or 10KB. In any case, I need > to change the setting because posts that are obviously not very large are > getting trapped. > > Anne, can you help with this please? > > Thanks, > Lynne > > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/[email protected]/ > > Archives: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > -- Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com>

On a slow list you might suggest folks dont use digest . Be nice to have a busy list but I don't have any for sure. I have never used it as admin either. On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 2:16 PM David E. Cann <[email protected]> wrote: > Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of our > routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did overnight > with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been reached? > As > it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a > single > digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list posts > arrive > to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for the list. This is > crazy. At a time when the average list is on the brink of being "dead and > buried" already because of past operation issues and errors, to isolate > digest users like this is NOT going to be helpful and will only make things > worse in the long run. > > Personally, I have never been a great supporter of the digest option at all > for a number of reasons, but so long as the subscribers DO seem to like it, > then it seems to me we that effectively stretching out the delivery of a > digest potentially FOR WEEKS OR LONGER needs to be reconsidered, and the > supplemental daily delivery of the digest we used to have should be > reconsidered and returned. Can anyone reading this is aware of a digest > delivery schedule such as we had in Mailman 2.17 is NOT gone as seems > apparent now, then please advise. If Mailman 2.17 could do it, why can't > Mailman 3.0??? > > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/[email protected]/ > > Archives: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Nivard, did you ever get an answer to this? All of a sudden I'm getting posts rejected from LancsGen with notations that posts are being held because they exceed 11KB. I'm not sure where the 11KB came from because my recollection is that LancsGen was set for 9.5 or 10KB. In any case, I need to change the setting because posts that are obviously not very large are getting trapped. Anne, can you help with this please? Thanks, Lynne

Does Anne or anyone else here know if there is any real likelihood of our routine list digests ever getting a DAILY posting, as they did overnight with Mailman 2.17 when the **kb accumulation limit had not been reached? As it is now, without a daily supplementary limit and very slow lists, a single digest can quite easily go for DAYS OR WEEKS before enough list posts arrive to total 30kb or whatever the accumulation limit is for the list. This is crazy. At a time when the average list is on the brink of being "dead and buried" already because of past operation issues and errors, to isolate digest users like this is NOT going to be helpful and will only make things worse in the long run. Personally, I have never been a great supporter of the digest option at all for a number of reasons, but so long as the subscribers DO seem to like it, then it seems to me we that effectively stretching out the delivery of a digest potentially FOR WEEKS OR LONGER needs to be reconsidered, and the supplemental daily delivery of the digest we used to have should be reconsidered and returned. Can anyone reading this is aware of a digest delivery schedule such as we had in Mailman 2.17 is NOT gone as seems apparent now, then please advise. If Mailman 2.17 could do it, why can't Mailman 3.0??? David

That hasn't been working in a very long time, like Nov 1, 2013 when I received my last notification. On Nov 4, 2013 a dicussion ensued on the Board Admins list on the same subject. I didn't see a message about a resolution, but the same discussion took place in Jan 2014. Gene At 02:50 PM 4/28/2018, P. S. & C. A. Wyant wrote: >Re: the Boards, I KNOW there have been posts to the Boards that I have not >received. I also admin. the SUFFOLK Board and I'm not getting those or any >of my other Boards ... anything you can assist with on that?? > >Regards, > >Peter

Peter, Looking at the archives, there has not been a message to that list for three weeks. I would send a test message, but I don't want to spam that many people. When the next email gets sent to that list or some other list when that is happening, send me the list and the subject and then we can look in the logs and investigate further. Anne On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:02 PM, P. S. & C. A. Wyant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Anne, > > I know you're very busy, but could you please take a look at the SUFFOLK > list and tell me why I'm not getting copies of any of the posts to that > list?? I'm not getting copies of any posts to any of the lists or boards > that I admin, but that's the busiest of my lists. > > Thanks! > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: P. S. Wyant [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 18:12 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LO]Re: Quick Question ... > > Anne, > > have you been able to look at the SUFFOLK List yet to see why I'm not > getting copies of posts sent to the List? (OR any other List that I admin?) > > Thanks, > > Peter > List Admin. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > [email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/ > [email protected]/ > > Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > [email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > -- Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com>

Thanks, Anne ... YES, that was the first thing I checked weeks ago ... they're all "Yes". What's next? PSW -----Original Message----- From: Anne Gillespie Mitchell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 08:13 To: Listowners list for Rootsweb list admins and moderators Subject: [LO]Re: Quick Question ... Hi, First go to this page: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/mailmansettings/ and make sure that Receive own postings is set to yes. And then make sure that on your list membership page: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/suffolk.rootsweb.com/mem bers/options/[email protected] the same is set to yes. Anne On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:02 PM, P. S. & C. A. Wyant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Anne, > > I know you're very busy, but could you please take a look at the SUFFOLK > list and tell me why I'm not getting copies of any of the posts to that > list?? I'm not getting copies of any posts to any of the lists or boards > that I admin, but that's the busiest of my lists. > > Thanks! > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: P. S. Wyant [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 18:12 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LO]Re: Quick Question ... > > Anne, > > have you been able to look at the SUFFOLK List yet to see why I'm not > getting copies of posts sent to the List? (OR any other List that I admin?) > > Thanks, > > Peter > List Admin. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > View the archives for this list at: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > [email protected]/ > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/ > [email protected]/ > > Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > [email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > -- Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/[email protected]/ Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Already did all those things some time ago. Dan. :) Dan On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 7:13 AM Anne Gillespie Mitchell < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > First go to this page: > > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/mailmansettings/ > > and make sure that Receive own postings is set to yes. > > And then make sure that on your list membership page: > > > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/suffolk.rootsweb.com/members/options/[email protected] > > the same is set to yes. > > Anne > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:02 PM, P. S. & C. A. Wyant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, Anne, > > > > I know you're very busy, but could you please take a look at the SUFFOLK > > list and tell me why I'm not getting copies of any of the posts to that > > list?? I'm not getting copies of any posts to any of the lists or boards > > that I admin, but that's the busiest of my lists. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Peter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: P. S. Wyant [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 18:12 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [LO]Re: Quick Question ... > > > > Anne, > > > > have you been able to look at the SUFFOLK List yet to see why I'm not > > getting copies of posts sent to the List? (OR any other List that I > admin?) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Peter > > List Admin. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > You are receiving this email because you have registered with RootsWeb > > Mailing Lists. Manage your email preferences at: > > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/accounts/subscriptions/ > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe > > > > View the archives for this list at: > > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > > [email protected]/ > > > > Your privacy is important to us. View our Privacy Statement at > > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement for more information. > > Use of RootsWeb is subject to our Terms and Conditions > > https://www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/termsandconditions > > > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > > community > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > > > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/ > > [email protected]/ > > > > Archives: https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/ > > [email protected]/ > > > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > > community > > > > > > > -- > Anne Mitchell <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> > > http://clustergenealogy.com <http://www.clustergenealogy.com> > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/postorius/lists/[email protected]/ > > Archives: > https://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > >