On Sun, 07 Oct 2018 06:39:38 +0100, "Susie Zada" <szada@zades.com.au> <listowners@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Example - emails from xyz@vworkonline.biz where xyz changes but the > domain remains the same. So - (?i).*@vworkonline.biz - should do. Mailman2 alsways matches in a case-insensitive manner, Mailman 3 seems to be case-sensitive, so the initial (?i) forces case-insensitivity. You may try leaving it out as it will be rare for there to be upper case characters submitted. .* matches any string of characters Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk>

Hi Malcolm, Example - emails from xyz@vworkonline.biz where xyz changes but the domain remains the same. I've have three different domains that are regularly appearing with different prefixes but consistant domains. Regards ... Susie Z October 7, 2018 4:25 PM, "Malcolm Austen" <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:14:21 +0100, Susie Zada <szada@zades.com.au> wrote: > > Can you describe what collection(s) of 'similar' email addresses you want to ban? > > Malcolm. > > -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk>

On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:14:21 +0100, Susie Zada <szada@zades.com.au> wrote: > For Listowners, can someone help me with the correct syntax for banned > emails - where you enter > either the exact email address OR > "use a regular expression to match similar email addresses" Can you describe what collection(s) of 'similar' email addresses you want to ban? Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk>

what? This particular site is so old, old, old! David Samuelsen On 10/5/2018 3:22 PM, Gene Phillips wrote: > http://sites.rootsweb.com/~jfuller/gen_mail.html > > I received a message as the list owner for the Missouri state list about updating a link on the above page. The rootsweb lists I looked at still have the listname-l-request@rootsweb.com email link to subscribe. > Megan Zurawicz is shown as a contact but apparently the email link for her does not work. > > Gene

Hi Keith, Thanks for the reply - I did Google the term and found a multitude of options - I'm particularly interested in the option applicable to the Rootsweb Listowner options. I thought there might be some relevant help options but still not finding anything. I was hoping other Listowners new what worked for Banned Emails on Rootsweb. Regards ... Susie Z October 7, 2018 11:16 AM, "Keith Meintjes" <kmeintjes@gmail.com> wrote: > You may be about to learn more than you ever wanted to know ... > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Regular-5Fexpression&d=Dw > BaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=1QUnAZaIMskcvFkbOnJmM1q > dvWQgb7-18w9xh0A1EU&s=vNF2K0HvQh1jwRvgyDA5lmr7dG3nbMf6ShbFmAXxIFE&e= > > Keith > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 6:14 PM Susie Zada <szada@zades.com.au> wrote: >

You may be about to learn more than you ever wanted to know ... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Regular-5Fexpression&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=1QUnAZaIMskcvFkbOnJmM1qvdvWQgb7-18w9xh0A1EU&s=vNF2K0HvQh1jwRvgyDA5lmr7dG3nbMf6ShbFmAXxIFE&e= Keith On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 6:14 PM Susie Zada <szada@zades.com.au> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > For Listowners, can someone help me with the correct syntax for banned > emails - where you enter > either the exact email address OR > > "use a regular expression to match similar email addresses" > > Many thanks in anticipation. > > Regards ... Susie Z > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_rootswebpref&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=1QUnAZaIMskcvFkbOnJmM1qvdvWQgb7-18w9xh0A1EU&s=ABWr_OZRAXimoEZbFkYOLHujgRcHJez60TYV39EZiE4&e= > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/listowners@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2JWBOdY&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=1QUnAZaIMskcvFkbOnJmM1qvdvWQgb7-18w9xh0A1EU&s=I3YQxFwBni9l5WZytzH1PPJEwRJREerxJBniddg_Cyk&e= Terms and Conditions: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2HDBym9&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=1QUnAZaIMskcvFkbOnJmM1qvdvWQgb7-18w9xh0A1EU&s=x9euPBhH6MDT2RAZWYHzyCCwnMlsRVptzpNxRX-6oAU&e= > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > -- +1.248.891.6434 Michigan, USA (Eastern Time)

Hi Folks, For Listowners, can someone help me with the correct syntax for banned emails - where you enter either the exact email address OR "use a regular expression to match similar email addresses" Many thanks in anticipation. Regards ... Susie Z

http://sites.rootsweb.com/~jfuller/gen_mail.html I received a message as the list owner for the Missouri state list about updating a link on the above page. The rootsweb lists I looked at still have the listname-l-request@rootsweb.com email link to subscribe. Megan Zurawicz is shown as a contact but apparently the email link for her does not work. Gene

I thought so too - got one on 10/4 for MNCHISAG Tim Stowell On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 7:51 PM Ian Marr <ian_marr@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > I thought these had been stopped. FWIW I have kept the held messages for > investigation, if needed. > > Lists are: > > PARKER > WRIGHT > > Regards, > Ian MARR > at 38° 24' 01.299" S by 142° 34' 11.9094" E; 6m above sea level > Remember, to EVERY question in life, there is MORE than ONE correct answer. >

Hi Allan Yes I reported it a while back, although tongue in cheek style It was always the case in the old archives, only it wasn't as obvious as the archives were shown in the way they are now Its due to the poster having their clock incorrectly set, we don't usually have that problem these days Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 04/10/2018 17:38, allan_raymond--- via LISTOWNERS wrote: > Not sure if this has been reported before, but some archives are showing years into the future. > > This applies to some of my lists plus for example this list (i.e. LISTOWNERS). This particular list shows archives for 2056, 2094 & 2098, any idea if this problem is in hand for a resolution?

At 12:38 PM 10/4/2018, allan_raymond--- via LISTOWNERS wrote: >Not sure if this has been reported before, but some archives are >showing years into the future. > >This applies to some of my lists plus for example this list (i.e. >LISTOWNERS). This particular list shows archives for 2056, 2094 & >2098, any idea if this problem is in hand for a resolution? I think it depends on the clock setting of the computer of the poster. Pat A.

On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 17:49:40 +0100, W David Samuelsen <dsam52@sampubco.com> wrote: > Why should it be? > > When subscribers do that in my lists, I simply go into admin and change > their status from digest to regular. That's reactive though, by that time you already have a message distributed with the undesirable subject line and, as happened on this list, others may follow up on that post. My solution is proactive, it prevents the messages ever going out to the list. It also only has to be done once and immediately covers all list subscribers. Malcolm. > On 10/4/2018 2:35 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote: >> Even better is for listowners to go to Settings > Header Filters and >> create a filter: >> Header: subject >> Pattern: .*Digest.* >> Action: Hold for moderation >> Then the anything posted to the list with 'Digest' in the subject will >> be held for moderation. >> Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk>

Why should it be? When subscribers do that in my lists, I simply go into admin and change their status from digest to regular. David Samuelsen On 10/4/2018 2:35 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote: > Even better is for listowners to go to Settings > Header Filters and > create a filter: > > Header: subject > Pattern: .*Digest.* > Action: Hold for moderation > > Then the anything posted to the list with 'Digest' in the subject will > be held for moderation. > > Malcolm.

Not sure if this has been reported before, but some archives are showing years into the future. This applies to some of my lists plus for example this list (i.e. LISTOWNERS). This particular list shows archives for 2056, 2094 & 2098, any idea if this problem is in hand for a resolution?

On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 05:24:53 +0100, George W. Durman <germannaresearch@comcast.net> wrote: > Will users please stop sending posts with subject line referring to > Digests, such as "Re: LISTOWNERS Digest, Vol 13, Issue 316"? Even better is for listowners to go to Settings > Header Filters and create a filter: Header: subject Pattern: .*Digest.* Action: Hold for moderation Then the anything posted to the list with 'Digest' in the subject will be held for moderation. Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk>

At 03-10-2018 02:32 PM Wednesday, DVHH Mailing List Administrator wrote: *********START OF ORIGINAL MESSAGE TEXT********* >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64One of my mailing list members who is with >(at)sbcglobal.net has talked to >Rootsweb support a couple of times. First they were told to make a new >Mailman account. When that didn't seem to work, they were told that it was >their ISP that was the problem, ATT/Yahoo, not Rootsweb. >So, basically the opposite message from what you got. Resembles ping pong! >----------------------------------------------- >Darlene D Will users please stop sending posts with subject line referring to Digests, such as "Re: LISTOWNERS Digest, Vol 13, Issue 316"? Don't be so lazy that you can't change the subject line and make a subject that actually relates to your post. >(Snip) **********END OF ORIGINAL MESSAGE TEXT*********** George W. Durman germannaresearch@comcast.net https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/112017319/ https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/120949522/

> Pat, I am glad you were able to get your delivery problem resolved so > easily. I have done an online chat, and talked twice to technical > support -- the second time getting to 2nd tier tech, and they insist > they are not blocking rootsweb.com, and agree with me that I have not > blocked it inadvertently, yet I still can not get RootsWeb mail > delivered to me by att.net. I had no problem for ten years, and no > problem for six or eight months when they upgraded Mailman and brought > the lists back up. It just abruptly stopped in August. Well, I spoke too soon!  It stopped working almost immediately, he only released the email that was held.  Yesterday, I got back on ATT Chat for over an hours and went though clearing my filter box in Yahoo.  Thought that was the fix.  Today, when open up my computer, I found all my Rootsweb mail was sent to my google account.  I just spent a hour checking all my subscriptions and mysteriously many have switched my email address from this one to my gmail account. Still have a lot to change back but need to get off computer.  I find it all kind of weird. -- Pat Connors https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.connorsgenealogy.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=ccgf-x2GaXqx9sMKHUZ-Y5bb-n_aGVk0FB5yI5cRJpY&s=shYJnLRG2-YhfNQ5m2rtBb6arqwEWSBgTbPtwxXYjGs&e=

One of my mailing list members who is with (at)sbcglobal.net has talked to Rootsweb support a couple of times. First they were told to make a new Mailman account. When that didn't seem to work, they were told that it was their ISP that was the problem, ATT/Yahoo, not Rootsweb. So, basically the opposite message from what you got. Resembles ping pong! ----------------------------------------------- Darlene D On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 04:18, <listowners-request@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Send LISTOWNERS mailing list submissions to listowners@rootsweb.com > > To subscribe via email send a message with subject subscribe and body > subscribe to listowners-request@rootsweb.com > > To unsubscribe via email send a message with subject unsubscribe and > body unsubscribe to listowners-request@rootsweb.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > listowners-owner@rootsweb.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of LISTOWNERS digest..."Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: ATT problem solved (Pat Asher) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pat Asher <pasher@ee.net> > To: Listowners list for Rootsweb list admins and moderators < > listowners@rootsweb.com> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:47:15 -0400 > Subject: [LO] Re: ATT problem solved > At 07:42 PM 10/1/2018, Pat Connors wrote: > >Out of frustration, I got on an ATT help chat > >and whoever was on the other end, fixed the > >problem. So, if you hear from others with the > >same problem I had, refer to an online chat with ATT. -- Pat Connors > > Pat, I am glad you were able to get your delivery > problem resolved so easily. I have done an online > chat, and talked twice to technical support -- > the second time getting to 2nd tier tech, and > they insist they are not blocking rootsweb.com, > and agree with me that I have not blocked it > inadvertently, yet I still can not get RootsWeb > mail delivered to me by att.net. I had no problem > for ten years, and no problem for six or eight > months when they upgraded Mailman and brought the > lists back up. It just abruptly stopped in August. > > Pat Asher >

At 07:42 PM 10/1/2018, Pat Connors wrote: >Out of frustration, I got on an ATT help chat >and whoever was on the other end, fixed the >problem. So, if you hear from others with the >same problem I had, refer to an online chat with ATT. -- Pat Connors Pat, I am glad you were able to get your delivery problem resolved so easily. I have done an online chat, and talked twice to technical support -- the second time getting to 2nd tier tech, and they insist they are not blocking rootsweb.com, and agree with me that I have not blocked it inadvertently, yet I still can not get RootsWeb mail delivered to me by att.net. I had no problem for ten years, and no problem for six or eight months when they upgraded Mailman and brought the lists back up. It just abruptly stopped in August. Pat Asher

I thought these had been stopped. FWIW I have kept the held messages for investigation, if needed. Lists are: PARKER WRIGHT Regards, Ian MARR at 38° 24' 01.299" S by 142° 34' 11.9094" E; 6m above sea level Remember, to EVERY question in life, there is MORE than ONE correct answer. This message can be considered to be in the public domain. The home of SW Victorian Cemetery indexes: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ianmarr.net.au_&d=DwIDAw&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=x1eQ3Y40qxOo1pFcudQYCP5mLnRQs-ovAhDMGyHT2cE&s=CdE7HbZq8XJvgdpIEge_iPCEt1LttbjCd8k0ZAVqDR8&e= Allansford Weather (10 min updates): https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ianmarr.net.au_Weather_&d=DwIDAw&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=x1eQ3Y40qxOo1pFcudQYCP5mLnRQs-ovAhDMGyHT2cE&s=kumt1a9L9aHkNUKorsvm0YOVqdnmL5Lb5vvRfChV0kg&e= Family Tree (Ancestry): http://trees.ancestry.com.au/tree/66493449/family/pedigree?cfpid=48155438646&selnode=1 Family Tree (TribalPages): https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__marrwatts.tribalpages.com_&d=DwIDAw&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QqKR_1oid-wv3O1GFus6ukhkWVArI2oTvHi2_JUm6dE&m=x1eQ3Y40qxOo1pFcudQYCP5mLnRQs-ovAhDMGyHT2cE&s=iCqbUkIFRbcVoXivGK1JhZhqYvsKj-bUF44tu9pW4A8&e=