I am getting the label Half Source as well. With respect to the original question, I too am not getting any relationship calculated for children of second marriages three generations back. Gordie Fears -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Kowallek Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 4:36 PM To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com Subject: [SPAM]Re: [LEGACY] Problem with "relationships" On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:20:03 -0500, Claire Spinelli <jcspin@optonline.net> wrote: >You say they get labeled as "Half-whatever." If I understand the scenario >correctly, they would be "Half-whatever." Am I misunderstanding the >question? You are correct. I was responding to the original poster who said he was getting nothing displayed. But I did get something really odd with 6.0.0.110. I added a husband and wife with one male child. I then set relationships with the male child as the focus. Then I added a second husband to the same wife. For this couple I added a female child. She should be labeled as a "Half Sister", correct? But the label I get is "Half Source". Sherry, are you listening? Has this been reported as a bug? -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ****************** ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

At 17:45 01/12/2006, you wrote: >You don't have a relationship with John. He is the stepfather to Elizabeths >children but there is no blood relation to you. > >TomM Agreed, but I DO have a blood relationship with his children by Elizabeth, who is my direct ancestor >-----Original Message----- >From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On >Behalf Of Don Montague >Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:48 PM >To: legacy@rootsweb.com >Subject: [LEGACY] Problem with "relationships" > >Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an oddity >- may I try to explain? > >Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them >- the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on the >family view as we climb down the tree. > >Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth remains my >4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her children by John - to >whom I undoubtedly am related. > >Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, either in >my data or the program? All advice welcome > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG. >Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 30/11/2006 >05:07 > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >in the subject and the body of the message > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/560 - Release Date: 11/30/2006 >3:41 PM > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/562 - Release Date: 12/1/2006 >1:12 PM > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG. >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: >01/12/2006 06:36 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 01/12/2006 06:36

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:06:47 +0000, Don Montague <rootsweb.only@virgin.net> wrote: >>You don't have a relationship with John. He is the stepfather to Elizabeths >>children but there is no blood relation to you. >> >>TomM > >Agreed, but I DO have a blood relationship with his children by >Elizabeth, who is my direct ancestor If things were working properly for you, John would be listed as "Husband of 4the Great-Grandmother". And all their descendants would be listed as "Half ...". That's how it is working for me with 6.0.0.110. -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ******************

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:20:03 -0500, Claire Spinelli <jcspin@optonline.net> wrote: >You say they get labeled as "Half-whatever." If I understand the scenario >correctly, they would be "Half-whatever." Am I misunderstanding the >question? You are correct. I was responding to the original poster who said he was getting nothing displayed. But I did get something really odd with 6.0.0.110. I added a husband and wife with one male child. I then set relationships with the male child as the focus. Then I added a second husband to the same wife. For this couple I added a female child. She should be labeled as a "Half Sister", correct? But the label I get is "Half Source". Sherry, are you listening? Has this been reported as a bug? -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ******************

You say they get labeled as "Half-whatever." If I understand the scenario correctly, they would be "Half-whatever." Am I misunderstanding the question? Claire -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Kowallek Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:54 AM To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LEGACY] Problem with "relationships" On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:52:01 +0000, Don Montague <rootsweb.only@virgin.net> wrote: >>Have you tried Clearing and Setting the Relationships again ... with >>yourself as the focus? Sometimes this will solve the problem. > >Thanks for the suggestion, Dennis - I've just tried this, cancelling >relationships and then setiing them again with self as the origin - >no luck. Then, just for fun, I tried making Elizabeth's father = the >origin and cancelling & re-setting relations - and the relationships >of all Elizabeth's descendants, by both husbands, were correctly labelled. I have similar situations in my database, and they get labeled as "Half-whatever". >So I begin to think maybe the problem lies with the program rather >than my database? There are other possibilities ... a program setting that needs tweaking, etc. You may want to export a small portion of your database that exhibits the problem to another Legacy database and see what happens. If you want, feel free to send me a copy (as a GEDCOM) and I will try working with it also. -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ****************** ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

At 01:29 01/12/2006, you wrote: >On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:47:52 +0000, Don Montague ><rootsweb.only@virgin.net> wrote: > > >Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an > >oddity - may I try to explain? > > > >Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them > >- the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on > >the family view as we climb down the tree. > > > >Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth > >remains my 4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her > >children by John - to whom I undoubtedly am related. > > > >Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, > >either in my data or the program? All advice welcome > >Have you tried Clearing and Setting the Relationships again ... with >yourself as the focus? Sometimes this will solve the problem. Thanks for the suggestion, Dennis - I've just tried this, cancelling relationships and then setiing them again with self as the origin - no luck. Then, just for fun, I tried making Elizabeth's father = the origin and cancelling & re-setting relations - and the relationships of all Elizabeth's descendants, by both husbands, were correctly labelled. So I begin to think maybe the problem lies with the program rather than my database? Cheers Don >-- > >Dennis Kowallek >kowallek@iglou.com > >****************** > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG. >Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: >30/11/2006 05:07 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 01/12/2006 06:36

You don't have a relationship with John. He is the stepfather to Elizabeths children but there is no blood relation to you. TomM -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Don Montague Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:48 PM To: legacy@rootsweb.com Subject: [LEGACY] Problem with "relationships" Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an oddity - may I try to explain? Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them - the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on the family view as we climb down the tree. Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth remains my 4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her children by John - to whom I undoubtedly am related. Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, either in my data or the program? All advice welcome -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 30/11/2006 05:07 ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/560 - Release Date: 11/30/2006 3:41 PM -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/562 - Release Date: 12/1/2006 1:12 PM

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:52:01 +0000, Don Montague <rootsweb.only@virgin.net> wrote: >>Have you tried Clearing and Setting the Relationships again ... with >>yourself as the focus? Sometimes this will solve the problem. > >Thanks for the suggestion, Dennis - I've just tried this, cancelling >relationships and then setiing them again with self as the origin - >no luck. Then, just for fun, I tried making Elizabeth's father = the >origin and cancelling & re-setting relations - and the relationships >of all Elizabeth's descendants, by both husbands, were correctly labelled. I have similar situations in my database, and they get labeled as "Half-whatever". >So I begin to think maybe the problem lies with the program rather >than my database? There are other possibilities ... a program setting that needs tweaking, etc. You may want to export a small portion of your database that exhibits the problem to another Legacy database and see what happens. If you want, feel free to send me a copy (as a GEDCOM) and I will try working with it also. -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ******************

We've had some realtionship problems in the latest build 6.0.0.110 which have been fixed in the next update. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Don Montague Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:48 PM To: legacy@rootsweb.com Subject: [LEGACY] Problem with "relationships" Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an oddity - may I try to explain? Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them - the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on the family view as we climb down the tree. Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth remains my 4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her children by John - to whom I undoubtedly am related. Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, either in my data or the program? All advice welcome

Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an oddity - may I try to explain? Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them - the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on the family view as we climb down the tree. Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth remains my 4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her children by John - to whom I undoubtedly am related. Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, either in my data or the program? All advice welcome -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 30/11/2006 05:07

Can somebody please point me in the direction of a program which i can use to produce charts from my Legacy family tree databases - preferably one as flexible & powerful as Easychart which normally runs with Generations? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 30/11/2006 05:07

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:47:52 +0000, Don Montague <rootsweb.only@virgin.net> wrote: >Having switched on relationships in my Legacy 6 family tree I find an >oddity - may I try to explain? > >Elizabeth and James are married and I am directly descended from them >- the relationships of all their descendants to yours truly appear on >the family view as we climb down the tree. > >Now James died and Elizabeth married John, let us say. Elizabeth >remains my 4G Grandmother, but no relationship appears for her >children by John - to whom I undoubtedly am related. > >Have I missed something simple, or is there perhaps a minor bug, >either in my data or the program? All advice welcome Have you tried Clearing and Setting the Relationships again ... with yourself as the focus? Sometimes this will solve the problem. -- Dennis Kowallek kowallek@iglou.com ******************

Greetings, Could someone please provide me with a brief "How To" on adding children (who retain their father's name) of unwed mothers? I searched the FAQs. If there is another knowledgebase that I should search, please let me know. Happy Thanksgiving! Ruth North Carolina

You add a marriage where the spouse is not known, or else specify who the father was but mark that tehy weren't married - I think it is Legacy that lets you do that. Yours, Dora Smith Austin, TX tiggernut24@yahoo.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruth" <rpstant@earthlink.net> To: <LEGACY@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 10:44 AM Subject: [LEGACY] Help - Linking children to a single mother > Greetings, > > Could someone please provide me with a brief "How To" on adding children > (who retain their father's name) of unwed mothers? > > I searched the FAQs. If there is another knowledgebase that I should > search, please let me know. > > Happy Thanksgiving! > > Ruth > North Carolina > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006

Deb, For the Error 3021, please go to our website at http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Solutions by Error Number, where you'll find a solution to this error message. The user ID isn't populated automatically. You can go to Options > Customize > Other and select to "Fill all ID fields" and then click on the Apply button to add the RIN to all individuals or to only blank fields. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Deb Wetlaufer Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:43 PM To: Legacy Rootsweb Subject: [LEGACY] User ID Not Generating I am adding some new individuals and I notice that the User ID field is not being populated. Also, when I try to add a new son/daughter I get several error messages... this is one of them: Error getting next deleted MRIN. Error 3021: No current record. Would you like to TRY IT AGAIN? Another relates to a marriage ID.... I shut down Legacy and restarted it, but the same thing is happening. Does anyone know what I need to do to get it to create the User IDs again?

I am adding some new individuals and I notice that the User ID field is not being populated. Also, when I try to add a new son/daughter I get several error messages... this is one of them: Error getting next deleted MRIN. Error 3021: No current record. Would you like to TRY IT AGAIN? Another relates to a marriage ID.... I shut down Legacy and restarted it, but the same thing is happening. Does anyone know what I need to do to get it to create the User IDs again?

Hi Sherry, Wonderful news, no need to contact integrity or maybe y'all already did; LUG is working for me again. Thanks, have a blessed Thanksgiving. Best regards, Beth G. Support wrote: > Beth, > > We think that since our IP changed, Comcast is rejecting based on our IP and > we need to "re-register" the new one. > > I'm really hoping this gets squared away soon! Darn spammers anyway - life > was so much easier before they started causing problems <rbg> > > Thanks for using Legacy. > > Sherry > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > We are changing the world of genealogy! > > When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of stephen.graham@comcast.net > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:28 AM > To: legacy@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG > > Is this the issue again? > FAQ > Security > Mail Policy > Mail to Comcast is rejected and is returned with an error message containing > the code BL002. What does this mean? > You have been blocked from emailing the Comcast network because we have > determined that you are sending email from dynamic/residential IP space. > Comcast does not allow residential / dynamic IP addresses to directly > connect to our mail servers. In most cases, Comcast will classify your mail > server's IP address as dynamic if the reverse DNS does not comply with > standard static naming conventions. > How do I get my IP removed from the blocklist? > It is important that you ask your mail provider to review the settings of > your email server to ensure it is set up correctly so that it is not blocked > by Comcast in the future. When contacting your email administrator, you > should include the error message contained in the email which alerted you to > this problem. This error message contains important information to help > your email administrator resolve this issue. Removal requests can be sent > to www.comcastsupport.com/rbl and will require the IP address of the blocked > mail server. Requests submitted through this form are monitored 24 hours a > day, 7 days a week to ensure a timely response. > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Support" <Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com> > > >> Beth, >> >> The LUG list is up and running (I think...). Last Saturday afternoon, >> we went off-line because our server host moved all their servers to a >> new building for expansion. We were back on-line Monday morning but >> we're now hearing from quite a few users who aren't getting emails >> from us at all - either from the LUG list or from us directly. I know >> I've had quite a few bounces from Comcast, RoadRunner and a couple of >> other domain names so we're being rejected for some reason (and the >> reject messages haven't been at all >> helpful!) >> >> Ken's trying to sort through it all and I hope he gets it squared away >> really soon! >> >> Messages are getting *to* the list, although it's been pretty quiet >> > lately. > >> Thanks for using Legacy. >> >> Sherry >> Customer Support >> Millennia Corporation >> Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com >> >> We are changing the world of genealogy! >> >> When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. >> > > >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] >> On Behalf Of Beth Gay >> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 6:25 PM >> To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com >> Subject: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG >> >> I have not received any messages from LUG since 11 Nov 2006. I checked >> my junk mail folder but I found no messages from LUG. Does anyone else >> have this problem? >> >> Best regards, >> Beth G. >> >> >> >> >

Hi Sherry, I did not send the last message. I don't have Comcast. I use Integrity. Here is the support email address: support@integrity.com. <mailto:support@integrity.com> If I need to contact them tell me what message to send. Best regards, Beth G. Support wrote: <mailto:support@integrity.com> > Beth, > > We think that since our IP changed, Comcast is rejecting based on our IP and > we need to "re-register" the new one. > > I'm really hoping this gets squared away soon! Darn spammers anyway - life > was so much easier before they started causing problems <rbg> > > Thanks for using Legacy. > > Sherry > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > We are changing the world of genealogy! > > When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of stephen.graham@comcast.net > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:28 AM > To: legacy@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG > > Is this the issue again? > FAQ > Security > Mail Policy > Mail to Comcast is rejected and is returned with an error message containing > the code BL002. What does this mean? > You have been blocked from emailing the Comcast network because we have > determined that you are sending email from dynamic/residential IP space. > Comcast does not allow residential / dynamic IP addresses to directly > connect to our mail servers. In most cases, Comcast will classify your mail > server's IP address as dynamic if the reverse DNS does not comply with > standard static naming conventions. > How do I get my IP removed from the blocklist? > It is important that you ask your mail provider to review the settings of > your email server to ensure it is set up correctly so that it is not blocked > by Comcast in the future. When contacting your email administrator, you > should include the error message contained in the email which alerted you to > this problem. This error message contains important information to help > your email administrator resolve this issue. Removal requests can be sent > to www.comcastsupport.com/rbl and will require the IP address of the blocked > mail server. Requests submitted through this form are monitored 24 hours a > day, 7 days a week to ensure a timely response. > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Support" <Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com> > > >> Beth, >> >> The LUG list is up and running (I think...). Last Saturday afternoon, >> we went off-line because our server host moved all their servers to a >> new building for expansion. We were back on-line Monday morning but >> we're now hearing from quite a few users who aren't getting emails >> from us at all - either from the LUG list or from us directly. I know >> I've had quite a few bounces from Comcast, RoadRunner and a couple of >> other domain names so we're being rejected for some reason (and the >> reject messages haven't been at all >> helpful!) >> >> Ken's trying to sort through it all and I hope he gets it squared away >> really soon! >> >> Messages are getting *to* the list, although it's been pretty quiet >> > lately. > >> Thanks for using Legacy. >> >> Sherry >> Customer Support >> Millennia Corporation >> Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com >> >> We are changing the world of genealogy! >> >> When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. >> > > >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] >> On Behalf Of Beth Gay >> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 6:25 PM >> To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com >> Subject: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG >> >> I have not received any messages from LUG since 11 Nov 2006. I checked >> my junk mail folder but I found no messages from LUG. Does anyone else >> have this problem? >> >> Best regards, >> Beth G. >> >> >> >

Is this the issue again? FAQ Security > Mail Policy Mail to Comcast is rejected and is returned with an error message containing the code BL002. What does this mean? You have been blocked from emailing the Comcast network because we have determined that you are sending email from dynamic/residential IP space. Comcast does not allow residential / dynamic IP addresses to directly connect to our mail servers. In most cases, Comcast will classify your mail server's IP address as dynamic if the reverse DNS does not comply with standard static naming conventions. How do I get my IP removed from the blocklist? It is important that you ask your mail provider to review the settings of your email server to ensure it is set up correctly so that it is not blocked by Comcast in the future. When contacting your email administrator, you should include the error message contained in the email which alerted you to this problem. This error message contains important information to help your email administrator resolve this issue. Removal requests can be sent to www.comcastsupport.com/rbl and will require the IP address of the blocked mail server. Requests submitted through this form are monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to ensure a timely response. -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Support" <Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com> > Beth, > > The LUG list is up and running (I think...). Last Saturday afternoon, we > went off-line because our server host moved all their servers to a new > building for expansion. We were back on-line Monday morning but we're now > hearing from quite a few users who aren't getting emails from us at all - > either from the LUG list or from us directly. I know I've had quite a few > bounces from Comcast, RoadRunner and a couple of other domain names so we're > being rejected for some reason (and the reject messages haven't been at all > helpful!) > > Ken's trying to sort through it all and I hope he gets it squared away > really soon! > > Messages are getting *to* the list, although it's been pretty quiet lately. > > Thanks for using Legacy. > > Sherry > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > We are changing the world of genealogy! > > When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. > Thanks. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of Beth Gay > Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 6:25 PM > To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com > Subject: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG > > I have not received any messages from LUG since 11 Nov 2006. I checked my > junk mail folder but I found no messages from LUG. Does anyone else have > this problem? > > Best regards, > Beth G. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

Beth, We think that since our IP changed, Comcast is rejecting based on our IP and we need to "re-register" the new one. I'm really hoping this gets squared away soon! Darn spammers anyway - life was so much easier before they started causing problems <rbg> Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of stephen.graham@comcast.net Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 2:28 AM To: legacy@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG Is this the issue again? FAQ Security > Mail Policy Mail to Comcast is rejected and is returned with an error message containing the code BL002. What does this mean? You have been blocked from emailing the Comcast network because we have determined that you are sending email from dynamic/residential IP space. Comcast does not allow residential / dynamic IP addresses to directly connect to our mail servers. In most cases, Comcast will classify your mail server's IP address as dynamic if the reverse DNS does not comply with standard static naming conventions. How do I get my IP removed from the blocklist? It is important that you ask your mail provider to review the settings of your email server to ensure it is set up correctly so that it is not blocked by Comcast in the future. When contacting your email administrator, you should include the error message contained in the email which alerted you to this problem. This error message contains important information to help your email administrator resolve this issue. Removal requests can be sent to www.comcastsupport.com/rbl and will require the IP address of the blocked mail server. Requests submitted through this form are monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to ensure a timely response. -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Support" <Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com> > Beth, > > The LUG list is up and running (I think...). Last Saturday afternoon, > we went off-line because our server host moved all their servers to a > new building for expansion. We were back on-line Monday morning but > we're now hearing from quite a few users who aren't getting emails > from us at all - either from the LUG list or from us directly. I know > I've had quite a few bounces from Comcast, RoadRunner and a couple of > other domain names so we're being rejected for some reason (and the > reject messages haven't been at all > helpful!) > > Ken's trying to sort through it all and I hope he gets it squared away > really soon! > > Messages are getting *to* the list, although it's been pretty quiet lately. > > Thanks for using Legacy. > > Sherry > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > Support@LegacyFamilyTree.com > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > We are changing the world of genealogy! > > When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. > Thanks. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:legacy-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Beth Gay > Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 6:25 PM > To: LEGACY@rootsweb.com > Subject: [LEGACY] No messages from LUG > > I have not received any messages from LUG since 11 Nov 2006. I checked > my junk mail folder but I found no messages from LUG. Does anyone else > have this problem? > > Best regards, > Beth G. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LEGACY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message