Not to mention that Samuel died in 1849--10 years before John Peter was born. If the submitter had done his homework, he'd have found out that fact. I've been researching this family for nearly 30 years and know them frontwards and backwards. I haven't had a chance to get back to it today, Family Tree was awfully poky last night when I was trying to separate them out, & I've been gone all day today. I appreciate your help, David. Reading my emails from new to old, so not sure if you had any other comments yet. Alice Allen Oakhurst Ward Family History Consultant Vancouver WA Stake Portland OR Temple District *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/2/2009 at 10:12 AM dsam52@sampubco.com wrote: >I had a good look at Allen case involving John Peter Paxton. > >It turned out that one submitter to Temple Records assumed he was son of >Samuel and Amey and did the sealing to them. (consider this, he was born >in 1859 and Samuel and Amey were born 1803 and 1805 respectively) > >so there was no looping problem when these 2 records were separated from >29 other records. > >She is going to try to see if she can separate him from Samuel and Amey >in FamilyTree or not. > >David Samuelsen > > >Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to >LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message