Can someone out there console me? William McCord had a 200 page book written about him and his descendants. While he died intestate and was before census records, he was a Kentucky pioneer. Land and other records make the connections. The book used meticulous research and I contributed to it with many other fine researchers. I did his temple work 30 years ago. I cannot get a PID because they didn't have them back then and someone combined his with a person born 100 years before he was. The whole thing is such a mess. And this is the answer I get? I tried to delete wrong relationships without luck. This the ongoing pain of FamilyTree. I am guilty until proven innocent...someone else can mess this up without proof, but I have to send documentation? Really? Michele Dear Sister Brooks, Thank you for contacting FamilySearch regarding John MacCord 1680 and William McCord, 1760 being combined. We reviewed your records in new.FamilySearch first and found John MacCord, 1680,PID: 9WH4-HB6 combined with William McCord, 1760. There are 98 combined records and only #1, and #41, are for John McCord, the rest are for William McCord. This same information has carried through to Family Tree, in small family groups, and is more obvious. Thank you for the offer of Family Group sheets, they would need to have documented evidence to support them It would be helpful if you listed William McCord, his PID, and his three wives names and their PID’s , plus the children for each wife, separate. Also, who William McCord’s correct parents are. With this information we will review your records further. Please reply directly to this email by using your email reply function instead of creating a new email to ensure your email comes directly back to us. We will try to assist you further. Sincerely, FamilySearch Patron and Partner Services support@familysearch.org