[email protected] said: Have you folks run into this sort of buzz saw of demands? (See below) I wrote Family Search asking them to remove the submitter "Family Search" from a name I submitted in 2007 for the sealing to parents ordinance (baptism and endowment were complete) and that had been in limbo since then. This person was born in 1862 and descends from a common ancestor of mine. Isn't it a little bit of overkill to ask for jpgs of records...some of which don't even exist like birth certificates in 1862, or personal knowledge of a close family member (150 years ago?) I am technically capable of this and will comply, but 90% of church members would walk away from this. I have asked for similar release of names so I could complete temple work and never received this kind of reply. Seems like overkill in the worst, most discouraging way. Karen said: Yes, they do ask me for proof in the form of Jpg's and also my relationship to the individual. I have protested this (mildly) since if something is wrong , *and* I have proof, then what difference does it make what my relationship is? I also transcribe most of my records and don't have them in jpg - which I tell them, and they accept the transcription. It is my opinion that this is a bit of overkill. However, if they will fix the error, I will tell them my relationship and give them the proof. Of course, it didn't take either of those things to enter a mistake into NFS. Many times I have written to individuals to ask them to correct errors they made in a temple submission to NFS. Some are irritated. Some don't write me back. But mostly they are confused because they don't know how to correct it. Just dealing with the support staff requires some skill. Of course support is very nice and try to be helpful and I have respect for their efforts. But I think they are used to mostly explaining very simple things to individuals, and if there is something that is in error *and* there are completed ordinances involved - the case must go up the ladder to engineering. So unsophisticated or non-genealogists don't have jpg's of their info and can't express that Joe Jones is their 2rd cousin once removed. Yes, correcting errors in NFS is very difficult, and confusing. Karen