What was the point of developing NFS, then as people get comfortable with it, switching again? Why not just fix the glitches in the first program. I don't find FT nearly as easy to navigate around in, and so don't go to it very often. Karen In a message dated 6/18/2009 11:11:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, jncrandell@broadweave.net writes: Harry wrote: Jill am I understanding that Family Tree will replace NFS? Yes, that is the direction it is moving. There are many features in nFS that are not yet functional in Family Tree, so the transition will wait until the programming is finished. They are already calling nFS the "classic" new FamilySearch, and it hasn't even finished the roll-out! I've already gotten attached to classic nFS, and I'm having trouble transitioning to Family Tree, but I have to say that I absolutely love the way Family Tree handles the ordinance list rather than the pages we get in nFS. However, I like the ordinance selection process in nFS. I'm hoping that is a feature that will be activated in Family Tree in future versions. We're all just going to have to hang on for the ride, and continue to give our feedback as we move forward. Jill Crandell Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349 (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222435718x1201460505/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick. net%2Fclk%3B215748553%3B38126199%3Bs)

the nFS was in development for years, at least 5 years or longer before the rapid evolution of the Internet to Web2. I don't care for FamilyTree because there are many parts not friendly, much less there are parts in nFS not in FT that I wanted so I use nFS more. I use FT to do separation of certain records that are too big for nFS. David Samuelsen Sahara346@aol.com wrote: > What was the point of developing NFS, then as people get comfortable with > it, switching again? Why not just fix the glitches in the first program. > I don't find FT nearly as easy to navigate around in, and so don't go to it > very often. > > Karen > > > In a message dated 6/18/2009 11:11:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > jncrandell@broadweave.net writes: > > Harry wrote: > Jill am I understanding that Family Tree will replace NFS? > > Yes, that is the direction it is moving. There are many features in nFS > that > are not yet functional in Family Tree, so the transition will wait until > the > programming is finished. They are already calling nFS the "classic" new > FamilySearch, and it hasn't even finished the roll-out! I've already gotten > attached to classic nFS, and I'm having trouble transitioning to Family > Tree, but I have to say that I absolutely love the way Family Tree handles > the ordinance list rather than the pages we get in nFS. However, I like the > ordinance selection process in nFS. I'm hoping that is a feature that will > be activated in Family Tree in future versions. We're all just going to > have > to hang on for the ride, and continue to give our feedback as we move > forward. > > Jill Crandell > > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > **************Dell Inspiron 15: Now starting at $349 > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222435718x1201460505/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick. > net%2Fclk%3B215748553%3B38126199%3Bs) > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >