Interesting how this conversation has morphed. I know people who work and struggle for years to get any names for temple work. Others have names "pour out of the computer" so to speak. Our circumstances are not always alike. Two Rootsweb conference speakers reminded attendees that we should submit no more names than we can do in a "reasonable amount of time, probably a few months." If a researcher has dozens of temple-going family members or a supportive ward, they can probably get more names done than one who doesn't have that, but they cautioned us about having more than 200 names in the temple file at a time because of the difficulty it gives the program. For example, names may not print properly on an FOR. They urged us not to feel guilty about not being able to do all the work we find all at once. I have experimented by putting a few family names into the program without tapping them for temple work--or more than just baptism, etc.-- right away. Nearly half have already been picked up and completed. Conversely, I have also found names that were begun by others or through extraction that I've been able to complete. I would rather have the names waiting in the program than in my computer. It's one step closer for them. It's also an excellent way of making contact with other researchers. And if the names wait until the Millennium, the data is in place to support the effort when the time comes. I have also assisted people whose health is precarious, who have no immediate LDS family, with putting all their data into the program, rather than leave it in their own computer files should they die. They are attending the temple as often as their circumstances permit. We should not begin unauthorized extractions of lists of persons such as Holocaust victims. That is actively discouraged. Jerry __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6876 (20120211) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com