Very True, there are valid reasons for what our leaders counsel us to do, and we should not question the rules. We are also only to reserve the names that we can reasonbly do in a short amount of time, because many have been reserved for years and the person reserving may have died and not done the work.  If it is reserved and not completed then it is very difficult to get it released.  My great-grandfather was held like this by a none relative, who passed away leaving me with a difficult situation trying to get his work completed while reserved under her name. I have learned a lot by your posts today, Thanks, Betty Jo ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 5:51:11 PM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] temple ordinances Official line, back off on those with less than 110 years, without written permission from closest relatives. speaker was very very very clear on this issue. David On 2/9/2012 4:24 PM, Steve Kelsey wrote: > I disagree completely with this.  People completely identified and related > to you should be submitted as soon as possible for temple ordinances to be > completed provided of course, they meet the 110 year requirement.  Putting > in the data in the vain hope that someone else will do the work later is not > the way things should be done. > Steve Kelsey Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message