Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] Some Things I Learned at RootsTech 2012
    2. What do you mean 95 year rule is abolished? If less than 110 but more than 95 AND you have a death date, can yo udo the work? Or, 110 years period with or without death date? Your comment below was a little confusing. Michele In a message dated 2/8/2012 6:26:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: they're online already, go to youtube.com You must have missed those two FamilySearch sessions, no mention of new and stricter 110 year rule for doing ordinances for near relatives without *written* permission. I was there and asked Amanda Terry to clarify of this 110 year rule. That is what she meant and in turn I learned from other consultants who said they had problems with those patrons flouting the rule of permissions. Also 95 year rule is abolished and replaced by long-standing rule - 110 year rule without death death, no matter what. Amanda Terry listed 10 points. I will have to ask her for copy if it is not in the syllabus. David S. On 2/7/2012 2:33 AM, Donald R. Snow wrote: > 6. Someone mentioned that all the talks were being recorded and would > be posted along with the PowerPoint slides synchronized, but I didn't > hear that officially. Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    02/08/2012 05:26:56
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] Some Things I Learned at RootsTech 2012
    2. W David Samuelsen
    3. 1. long-standing 110 year rule for no death dates, still in effect for long time. 2. Abolished 95/100 year rule for doing family ordinances without permission and replaced with stricer 110 year rule. Written permission is required before death. I asked this question specifically to clarify the new rule. I can send to anyone who want to see what was presented, in PDF format (needs Adobe Reader), contact me direct. Details are laid out. Please note the 95 year in pdf had been superseded by decision barely 2 weeks ago. W. David Samuelsen On 2/8/2012 10:26 PM, [email protected] wrote: > What do you mean 95 year rule is abolished? > > If less than 110 but more than 95 AND you have a death date, can yo udo the > work? > > Or, 110 years period with or without death date? Your comment below was a > little confusing. > > Michele > > > In a message dated 2/8/2012 6:26:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > they're online already, go to youtube.com > > You must have missed those two FamilySearch sessions, no mention of new > and stricter 110 year rule for doing ordinances for near relatives > without *written* permission. I was there and asked Amanda Terry to > clarify of this 110 year rule. That is what she meant and in turn I > learned from other consultants who said they had problems with those > patrons flouting the rule of permissions. > > Also 95 year rule is abolished and replaced by long-standing rule - 110 > year rule without death death, no matter what. > > Amanda Terry listed 10 points. I will have to ask her for copy if it is > not in the syllabus. > > David S. > > On 2/7/2012 2:33 AM, Donald R. Snow wrote: >> 6. Someone mentioned that all the talks were being recorded and would >> be posted along with the PowerPoint slides synchronized, but I didn't >> hear that officially. > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > [email protected] > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    02/08/2012 03:33:30