Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] Work Done for Living
    2. W David Samuelsen
    3. Nancy, Call 866-406-1830 with this problem case. They act faster if it is immediate family. It happened to me once - and got them to remove my aunt from nFS immediately. Somebody assumed my aunt to be dead when she is still very much alive and at age of 94! These PIDs tell me it was phsyically added to nFS, not through gedcom and merged with other records. LH2S-5WK - expunged, marked living LH2S-54W - "ready" without death date LH2S-54H - expunged, marked living LH2S-546 - expunged, marked living LH2S-54B - expunged, marked living LZF8-9H5 - are you sure it is correct? I get somebody who was born 1816. Call them to remove those marked living. These snould not be visible to anyone but this sister and her helper. David Samuelsen On 2/22/2012 4:02 PM, Nancy Scott wrote: > In particular, the Sister I was helping was concerned about the information > given for her husband who was born in 1948 but is listed as born in 1935. > It seemed strange because the print for him was dark and not in italics so I > took a look the LDS ordinances. Sure enough the work had been completed in > 2011. Five of his siblings had also had their ordinances completed which > the Sister I was helping says that they are all living. We used Feedback to > submit a case regarding the problem but the last I heard from her, she had > not received a reply.

    02/22/2012 11:24:27
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] Work Done for Living
    2. Nancy Scott
    3. David, Thanks for looking at them. Between the time I made the posting and the time you viewed them, changes were made to the files so now you cannot see what I meant about the death being empty but the work being completed. Not sure why the one now shows up at ready without death date. You were correct about the last being a typo. Should have been LZF8-PH5. So it was the "P" that I errored on. It now is expunged and living. I will send you the snips I took a couple of days ago that shows what it did look like on Sunday and at the time I took them. Any suggestions about how they got reserved when for work when they had nothing in the death field? Thanks for looking even though it was changed before you viewed them. Nancy -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] Work Done for Living Nancy, Call 866-406-1830 with this problem case. They act faster if it is immediate family. It happened to me once - and got them to remove my aunt from nFS immediately. Somebody assumed my aunt to be dead when she is still very much alive and at age of 94! These PIDs tell me it was phsyically added to nFS, not through gedcom and merged with other records. LH2S-5WK - expunged, marked living LH2S-54W - "ready" without death date LH2S-54H - expunged, marked living LH2S-546 - expunged, marked living LH2S-54B - expunged, marked living LZF8-9H5 - are you sure it is correct? I get somebody who was born 1816. Call them to remove those marked living. These snould not be visible to anyone but this sister and her helper. David Samuelsen On 2/22/2012 4:02 PM, Nancy Scott wrote: > In particular, the Sister I was helping was concerned about the > information given for her husband who was born in 1948 but is listed as born in 1935. > It seemed strange because the print for him was dark and not in > italics so I took a look the LDS ordinances. Sure enough the work had > been completed in 2011. Five of his siblings had also had their > ordinances completed which the Sister I was helping says that they are > all living. We used Feedback to submit a case regarding the problem > but the last I heard from her, she had not received a reply. Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    02/22/2012 01:50:18