nope! it the PRF submitter would show up along with reference to PRF. IGI is in 2 parts, public side is one without any ordinances while members can see when registered and logged in. David Samuelsen > So presumably it was the person in PRF who submitted the name to the > temple and in newfamilysearch they were just people who cleaned up the > information? Her record has been removed from the online IGI now. Paula > > > On May 7, 2009, at 1:03 PM, W. David Samuelsen wrote: > >> I checked, the submitter that showed up in nFS does not match at all >> to >> the ones that show up in Pedigree Resource File (PRF). Stanley Ann >> Durham is listed there. PRFs do not necessarily have dates listed. >> >> David Samuelsen >> >> Paula Goodfellow wrote: >>> I'm wondering about the submitter. I'm guessing that it went through >>> the Temple Ready since it was done in Provo. But wouldn't nfs have >>> prevented them from submitting the ordinance if it wasn't linked into >>> their tree? I suppose they could have created a fake connection >>> somewhere, but that seems pretty far-fetched. Paula >> >> Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to >> LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com >> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the message > > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >