Can't be soon enough!! :-) Michele In a message dated 2/11/2012 2:39:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: There was a RootsTech livesteam session that was all about the future of new FamilySearch that will be released in the coming months. It will take care of the problem of the anonymous submitters and the unclaimed legacy submitters. FamilySearch is well aware of the problem and has been working on a solution. The RootsTech streams haven't yet been divided up into the hour long sessions, but the daily streams can still be watched on RootsTech.org Rebecca Christensen --- On Sat, 2/11/12, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] temple ordinances To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, February 11, 2012, 4:25 PM What I'd like to know is...Do the NFS computer folks have any way of determining how long names have been waiting for ordinances completion? We can all see that info on individuals.....when the last ordinances was performed and who reserved it...and the ESPECIALLY ANNOYING Legacy submitters ( who are either dead, inactive, or lost their cards in the last 15 years). I am hopeful that they will announce and then begin to enforce within 6 months (to give folks a chance to have stake temple days or family temple days to finish things up)..and then just pull the plug on all the Legacy submissions and send them to "ready" and ditto anything that has been more than 3-5 years waiting for the next ordinances in sequence to be done. The engineers could do a lot to help us fulfill our responsibilities. Every month, I go through my "cleared and submitted list" from PAF and run Family Insight. I pick up newly completely ordinances but there are thousands of names that are not getting done and I believe may never be completed until Salt Lake takes action. Michele Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I'll say again that I think we need to be careful in assuming that all of these names that have been "sitting" for multiple years are not done. Many may not be, but I have work that I cleared in 2007, the work was done, yet it's still in my holding file because the ordinances were never recorded in nFS. I have no intention of releasing them, because the work is done and they will be duplicated if I do. I have contacted Salt Lake about this, and they have told me to wait. It's probably time for me to check again, but I can't believe that I'm the only one with this issue. Family members looking at this could think that I'm hoarding, or sitting on them, or being delinquent in whatever way they want to judge, but the work is done. Let's give others the benefit of the doubt and keep moving forward with whatever else needs to be done. Just my two cents, Jill Crandell