The thing is that there is absolutely nothing in thr death field that I can see so how could it be reserved in the first place forgetting that it needed permission. Nancy Sent from my Epic 4g -----Original Message----- From: Steve Kelsey <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] Work Done for Living Feedback has always been very responsive to me on a problem such as this where work has been done in error for living persons. I would suggest she check on the case and if it is closed re-open and re-submit. She can do this easily by viewing "My cases". It has happened when I have put in birth and christening dates it is very easy to put the christening date as the death date and get the work done in error. I guess the older you get the fewer brain cells you have. Anyway I have been able to get these easily corrected and out of nfs at least as showing dead and ready for ordinances. Steve Kelsey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nancy Scott" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 4:02 PM Subject: [LDS-WC] Work Done for Living > This past Sunday, I was helping a Sister in my Ward with some problems she > has encountered of a possible distant relative who put in data for the > family of the Sister's nonmember husband into nFS. I say possible distant > relative because the submitter will not respond to our emails to her and > when I called the phone number listed the person I talked to said that the > person I was looking had moved from their house and that she did not have > a > new phone number for her. > > > > In particular, the Sister I was helping was concerned about the > information > given for her husband who was born in 1948 but is listed as born in 1935. > It seemed strange because the print for him was dark and not in italics so > I > took a look the LDS ordinances. Sure enough the work had been completed > in > 2011. Five of his siblings had also had their ordinances completed which > the Sister I was helping says that they are all living. We used Feedback > to > submit a case regarding the problem but the last I heard from her, she had > not received a reply. > > > > The strangest thing about all of it that puzzles me is that there was > nothing in the death fields but still the work had been done. There are 2 > Contributors, the submitter and FamilySearch. > > > > The PIDs are: > > > > LH2S-5WK > > LH2S-54W > > LH2S-54H > > LH2S-546 > > LH2S-54B > > LZF8-9H5 > > > > I am wondering if anyone in the group has an explanation of how this > happened. > > > > I am still of the opinion that there needs to be something other than a > checkbox for even the 110 guideline. It seems that members either don't > read the message or they willfully ignore it. At least if they had to > enter > some data about how they were related or who they had permission from, > when > something was found it would be clear that they were willfully ignoring > it. > > > > Nancy Scott > > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > [email protected] > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message