Sorry...I set this apart from the rest... The legacy problems will be taken care of when they make the final switchover since only what's in the Summary in nFS will be carried over. Could you expand on how that will affect ordinances "in progress" both those in limbo since NFS was introduced and those currently submitted and progressing. Michele In a message dated 3/29/2012 3:08:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Michele, nothing is highlighted below so I don't know what you are asking, but I don't know anything about already submitted ordinances. You might check the FamilySearch Family Tree Users Guide that they posted online last week to see if they say anything about it there. Don Snow On 3/29/2012 3:04 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Wait ..do you mean (see highlighted below) unfinished/in progress > ordinances already submitted through NewFamily Search will be erased too? Or more > clearly, go back to Ready? > > Michele > > > From: "Donald R. Snow"<[email protected]> > To:<[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:19 AM > Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] FS Family Tree live on FamilySearch? > > >> Michele, regarding FamilySearch Family Tree, I really like how you can >> enter sources now and even URL's for sources. And FS FT is soooo much >> easier to edit than nfS. You just click on the pencil in front of the >> item and make the change. And you can change things that others have >> submitted so you can get it correct without all the rigamarole (sp?) >> from nFS. I think it's a great step forward. > > > The legacy problems will >> be taken care of when they make the final switchover since only what's >> in the Summary in nFS will be carried over. > > > As I understand it the old >> AF, PRF, etc., will be available in the Trees part of FS, but won't be >> in FS FT unless it was in the Summary. Then we can correct what needs >> correcting without having a hundred wrong copies of stuff in there. >> There are obviously many more things that remain to be done, but I'm >> really pleased with what they've got done so far. BTW, you can't see >> sources in nFS at all now. It directs you to FS FT. Anyone with an LDS >> Account can sign up to get to FS FT now. >> > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- Dr. Donald R. Snow, Retired Professor of Mathematics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah - [email protected] Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to [email protected] ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Again Michele, I don't know anything about what they will do with the ordinances, but I'm sure that ordinance cards printed but not completed yet will be fine. And I imagine they will do something about the ordinances that have been "in progress" for years, since they know that's a problem. I just haven't heard anything about what they plan to do on those. Don Snow On 3/29/2012 5:10 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Sorry...I set this apart from the rest... > > > The legacy problems will > be taken care of when they make the final switchover since only what's > in the Summary in nFS will be carried over. > > Could you expand on how that will affect ordinances "in progress" both > those in limbo since NFS was introduced and those currently submitted and > progressing. > > Michele > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2012 3:08:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Michele, nothing is highlighted below so I don't know what you are > asking, but I don't know anything about already submitted ordinances. > You might check the FamilySearch Family Tree Users Guide that they > posted online last week to see if they say anything about it there. > > Don Snow > > > On 3/29/2012 3:04 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Wait ..do you mean (see highlighted below) unfinished/in progress >> ordinances already submitted through NewFamily Search will be erased > too? Or more >> clearly, go back to Ready? >> >> Michele >> >> >> From: "Donald R. Snow"<[email protected]> >> To:<[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:19 AM >> Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] FS Family Tree live on FamilySearch? >> >> >>> Michele, regarding FamilySearch Family Tree, I really like how you can >>> enter sources now and even URL's for sources. And FS FT is soooo much >>> easier to edit than nfS. You just click on the pencil in front of the >>> item and make the change. And you can change things that others have >>> submitted so you can get it correct without all the rigamarole (sp?) >>> from nFS. I think it's a great step forward. >> >> The legacy problems will >>> be taken care of when they make the final switchover since only what's >>> in the Summary in nFS will be carried over. >> >> As I understand it the old >>> AF, PRF, etc., will be available in the Trees part of FS, but won't be >>> in FS FT unless it was in the Summary. Then we can correct what needs >>> correcting without having a hundred wrong copies of stuff in there. >>> There are obviously many more things that remain to be done, but I'm >>> really pleased with what they've got done so far. BTW, you can't see >>> sources in nFS at all now. It directs you to FS FT. Anyone with an > LDS >>> Account can sign up to get to FS FT now. >>> >> Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > [email protected] >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > -- Dr. Donald R. Snow, Retired Professor of Mathematics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah - [email protected]