several safeguards were ignored in this case. 1. 110 year rule 2. no permission from immediate family. and the record is not gone from the nFS. They are there, you can't find her name right away, so you have to go to her grandparents to find your way back to her. However, ordinances are not done at all. And I noticed something strange - the submitter appears to be of Kenya. David Samuelsen Paula Goodfellow wrote: > I thought some of you might be interested in this story that's hitting > the news tonight: > > http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705301616,00.html > > ABC news has reported on it, and there are also some pretty mean blog > posts about it. All the more reason to make sure we follow the rules > when submit names. Stanley Dunham's name does appear in the IGI, with > ordinances, but at newfamilysearch, it's not clear that the ordinances > were actually done. (Yes her name was Stanley. Born Kansas 1942 if you > want to look for her.) > > You can also see the names of the submitters at newfamilysearch. I > imagine they've been contacted already by the church, from the sound > of the Deseret News article. Paula > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >