RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. [LDS-WC] 1898 birthdates
    2. It would seem to me that person born in 1898 have now passed the 110 year limit for temple ordinances without death dates. I've been working on files tonight and had two in a row born in 1898 who were "not available." Is there a glitch in SL? Michele **************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823251x1201398665/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=May ExcfooterNO62)

    05/31/2009 03:59:47
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] 1898 birthdates
    2. W. David Samuelsen
    3. There should not be such a glitch to block that. Unless somebody beat you to the punch line and reserved them?? David Samuelsen JCBrooks@aol.com wrote: > It would seem to me that person born in 1898 have now passed the 110 year > limit for temple ordinances without death dates. > > I've been working on files tonight and had two in a row born in 1898 who > were "not available." > > Is there a glitch in SL? > > Michele > **************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy > Steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823251x1201398665/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=May > ExcfooterNO62) > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

    05/31/2009 02:47:41
    1. Re: [LDS-WC] 1898 birthdates
    2. W. David Samuelsen
    3. Unless their birthdates are after today's date, which is less than 110 years. David Samuelsen JCBrooks@aol.com wrote: > It would seem to me that person born in 1898 have now passed the 110 year > limit for temple ordinances without death dates. > > I've been working on files tonight and had two in a row born in 1898 who > were "not available." > > Is there a glitch in SL?

    05/31/2009 02:48:26