I agree with Gay that the cemetery checking is painful. Most of the time these tiny obscure cemeteries don't show up as options. Ohana might consider either adding all the cemeteries on the USGS or just not checking the burial...which sometimes takes two steps. Michele

Are you using nFS? (new familysearch). I try and use the web interface from time to time, I was taught that we need to put the burial city, state, etc in the burial place. The name of the cemetary should be in notes or the system will reject it. Or am I (as usual) wrong? Alan W. On 5/23/09, jcbrooks@aol.com <jcbrooks@aol.com> wrote: > > I agree with Gay that the cemetery checking is painful. Most of the > time these tiny obscure cemeteries don't show up as options. Ohana > might consider either adding all the cemeteries on the USGS or just not > checking the burial...which sometimes takes two steps. > Michele > >

"Whitcomb" <hwhitcomb@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you using nFS? (new familysearch). I try and use the web interface > from > time to time, I was taught that we need to put the burial city, state, etc > in the burial place. The name of the cemetary should be in notes or the > system will reject it. I think nFS suggests a standard location (with standard spelling etc), but it also lets you enter a location the way you want, along with a standard location that is closest to correct.