You have to go into "Temple Ordinances" and select the ones you want to do. I send families to there to accumulate up to 50 records before printing FORs for them. David Samuelsen JCBrooks@aol.com wrote: > Not in this case. I search and combine and clear the names in NFS and > then to submission. They have no other dates or holds on them. I'm the first > one. They go to my reserved list instead of just showing "in progress" on > the baptism. > > Very frustrating. > > Michele > > > In a message dated 6/8/2009 4:47:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > Sahara346@aol.com writes: > > I think it's a signal that "this name has been submitted", so that we > don't > do it again, or have a distant relative that we aren't even aware of see > the name and thing it needs to be done when actually it IS in the system. > > Karen > > > In a message dated 6/8/2009 12:46:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > JCBrooks@aol.com writes: > > I am helping a brother who only wants to do work for a few of his > ancestors > and let the temple do the rest. > > When I get to the page on submission where I choose to let others do the > work, I click that. A page comes up with "Temple" in all the ordinance > spots. I click Okay. > > Why are these names on the reserved list? And why do they show > "reserved" > on the family page? And when I try to send them to the temple, I > can't > get them to go? > > What am I missing? Does "reserved" mean that the temple is working on > them, unless I intervene? > > > Michele > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 > easy > steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=htt > p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= > JunestepsfooterNO62) > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 > easy > steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=htt > p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= > JunestepsfooterNO62) > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy > steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= > JunestepsfooterNO62) > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

Not in this case. I search and combine and clear the names in NFS and then to submission. They have no other dates or holds on them. I'm the first one. They go to my reserved list instead of just showing "in progress" on the baptism. Very frustrating. Michele In a message dated 6/8/2009 4:47:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Sahara346@aol.com writes: I think it's a signal that "this name has been submitted", so that we don't do it again, or have a distant relative that we aren't even aware of see the name and thing it needs to be done when actually it IS in the system. Karen In a message dated 6/8/2009 12:46:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time, JCBrooks@aol.com writes: I am helping a brother who only wants to do work for a few of his ancestors and let the temple do the rest. When I get to the page on submission where I choose to let others do the work, I click that. A page comes up with "Temple" in all the ordinance spots. I click Okay. Why are these names on the reserved list? And why do they show "reserved" on the family page? And when I try to send them to the temple, I can't get them to go? What am I missing? Does "reserved" mean that the temple is working on them, unless I intervene? Michele **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=htt p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62) Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=htt p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62) Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62)

What I sent to Feedback..... I am seeing a few rejects because of the program glitch NOT recognizing unnamed sons and daughters "Needs More Information" Good grief! The only reason they did not get any given name is because the families were CATHOLIC. When a child die BEFORE they get the Catholic baptisms, they do NOT get given names, period. Please fix the glitch so I can seal those "rejected" children in my large German Catholic family. W. David Samuelsen

WE ARE ALL SUFFERING from name clutter! Barbi in Manahawkin NJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Sahara346@aol.com To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:44 PM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] nFS Am I the only one that gets frustrated with the system's list of possible duplicates when I'm trying to clear names? It doesn't bother me as much in US records where my names are much less common, but my Dad is 100% Swedish from three areas of Sweden (if I count my grandfather's first wife). Giving me two Swedish names with no dates or places is not enough for me to say, "Yeah, that's them." Karen In a message dated 6/8/2009 12:21:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time, dsam52@sampubco.com writes: MIles, The earliesat date is the only valid date. Any later dates for same ordinances are not valid at all. Once is once, and that was and is the intent of the nFS to do away with duplications. It's valid if it is correct merged record. David Samuelsen Miles Meyer wrote: > > 2. If you use a program like AncestralQuest you can see the number of > times that the ordinances have been performed for individuals. nFS has > to choose one of the dates and it might not be the date you did the > work. However, in AQ you can choose which date you want to show in > your own files. I usually choose the earliest date but nFS may choose > one later for it display. > > Miles Meyer Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62) Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I think it's a signal that "this name has been submitted", so that we don't do it again, or have a distant relative that we aren't even aware of see the name and thing it needs to be done when actually it IS in the system. Karen In a message dated 6/8/2009 12:46:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time, JCBrooks@aol.com writes: I am helping a brother who only wants to do work for a few of his ancestors and let the temple do the rest. When I get to the page on submission where I choose to let others do the work, I click that. A page comes up with "Temple" in all the ordinance spots. I click Okay. Why are these names on the reserved list? And why do they show "reserved" on the family page? And when I try to send them to the temple, I can't get them to go? What am I missing? Does "reserved" mean that the temple is working on them, unless I intervene? Michele **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=htt p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62) Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62)

Am I the only one that gets frustrated with the system's list of possible duplicates when I'm trying to clear names? It doesn't bother me as much in US records where my names are much less common, but my Dad is 100% Swedish from three areas of Sweden (if I count my grandfather's first wife). Giving me two Swedish names with no dates or places is not enough for me to say, "Yeah, that's them." Karen In a message dated 6/8/2009 12:21:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time, dsam52@sampubco.com writes: MIles, The earliesat date is the only valid date. Any later dates for same ordinances are not valid at all. Once is once, and that was and is the intent of the nFS to do away with duplications. It's valid if it is correct merged record. David Samuelsen Miles Meyer wrote: > > 2. If you use a program like AncestralQuest you can see the number of > times that the ordinances have been performed for individuals. nFS has > to choose one of the dates and it might not be the date you did the > work. However, in AQ you can choose which date you want to show in > your own files. I usually choose the earliest date but nFS may choose > one later for it display. > > Miles Meyer Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62)

"A member in our ward wants to know if there is any way they can stop the rebaptism of their ancestors." A feature was added to Family Tree for us to add ordinance information that is not showing in nFS. This will help with IOUS that can't be combined, or anything else that is currently lost in the system. If the living baptisms need to be filled in, that says the records that are clearing the names have not been combined with membership records. First, try to combine. Second, add the dates by hand. Either way, the ordinances will not be able to be cleared again. If someone has already reserved them and they have not yet done the work, the link isn't available to add the information by hand. However, I have heard of people reserving these ordinances that have already been done as a way to prevent them from being done again. I wouldn't necessarily panic over the fact that they are reserved--if that's the case. Jill Crandell

Affordable Products wrote: > A member in our ward wants to know if there is any way they can stop the rebaptism of their ancestors. Their ancestors were baptized at age of 8 while still living. It concerns them that they keep seeing these rebaptisms because they realize that it is wasting time and money to redo them. > > Any advise? Only one advice - find the duplicate records first to see what is already in the nFS then locate the filmed original baptism records, use feedback to notify Membership Department. They do and will investigate the records and make changes. Can you tell us what the names of ancestors in question, so we can look at the record in the nFS? David Samuelsen

1. Yes I enter the information on all my living relatives and also extended family - but I leave the death information empty - mostly I do not know the dates anyway. Because then it is much easier for my children to take over at a later time and other relatives. With no death dates no-one else can see the information that is in my file anyway. Helle -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] På vegne af phlander2@juno.com Sendt: 8. juni 2009 17:01 Til: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Emne: [LDS-WC] nFS 1.Are you entering the information you have on living members of your family such as cousins and their children that are nonmembers on nFS? 2.Also, something else that is a curiosity to me. Some of the work that I sent in years before the duplicate work was performed now have later dates for confirm. and initiatories. These ordinances were performed at the time baptisims and endowments were performed, right?? It's not a problem but it is a curiosity every time I run across this. Thank you, Joan ____________________________________________________________ Everything looks better on a beautiful new projector screen! Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTJHllLtAvHUahW4BfMlvLedGq4 ave0Nqqe1hobxaPi8luPLlPpjE0/ Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

1.Are you entering the information you have on living members of your family such as cousins and their children that are nonmembers on nFS? 2.Also, something else that is a curiosity to me. Some of the work that I sent in years before the duplicate work was performed now have later dates for confirm. and initiatories. These ordinances were performed at the time baptisims and endowments were performed, right?? It's not a problem but it is a curiosity every time I run across this. Thank you, Joan ____________________________________________________________ Everything looks better on a beautiful new projector screen! Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTJHllLtAvHUahW4BfMlvLedGq4ave0Nqqe1hobxaPi8luPLlPpjE0/

A member in our ward wants to know if there is any way they can stop the rebaptism of their ancestors. Their ancestors were baptized at age of 8 while still living. It concerns them that they keep seeing these rebaptisms because they realize that it is wasting time and money to redo them. Any advise? From: W. David Samuelsen To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] nFS MIles, The earliesat date is the only valid date. Any later dates for same ordinances are not valid at all. Once is once, and that was and is the intent of the nFS to do away with duplications. It's valid if it is correct merged record. David Samuelsen Miles Meyer wrote: > > 2. If you use a program like AncestralQuest you can see the number of > times that the ordinances have been performed for individuals. nFS has > to choose one of the dates and it might not be the date you did the > work. However, in AQ you can choose which date you want to show in > your own files. I usually choose the earliest date but nFS may choose > one later for it display. > > Miles Meyer Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I am helping a brother who only wants to do work for a few of his ancestors and let the temple do the rest. When I get to the page on submission where I choose to let others do the work, I click that. A page comes up with "Temple" in all the ordinance spots. I click Okay. Why are these names on the reserved list? And why do they show "reserved" on the family page? And when I try to send them to the temple, I can't get them to go? What am I missing? Does "reserved" mean that the temple is working on them, unless I intervene? Michele **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585043x1201462775/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd= JunestepsfooterNO62)

I wouldn't worry too much. I have some in there also, mostly aunts, uncles and cousins from early on in nFS. But now that I am using AQ to sync it doesn't allow me to add living people. Miles On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Helle Thor Hirschmann<helle@hirschmann.dk> wrote: > I guess this is one of my major blunders - but ok, I am sure I can remove > all living without too much effort. > > Helle

1. I am not bothering to enter information on living people. I have that in my PAF file. I will make sure my children and grandchildren have access to it. 2. Sometimes, earlier ordinances such as confirmation and initiatory do not show. Then, the system may combine older baptism and endowment dates and newer confirmation and initiatory dates (because the older ones do not show), such as: Older record: B: 10 Jan 1994 C: not shown I: not shown E: 30 Mar 1994 Newer record: B: 10 Aug 2002 C: 10 Aug 2002 I: 10 Aug 2002 E: 18 Sep 2003 With the combined record being: B: 10 Jan 1994 C: 10 Aug 2002 I: 10 Aug 2002 E: 30 Mar 1994 I have not bothered to correct these as of yet. -------------------------------------------------- From: <phlander2@juno.com> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:01 PM To: <lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com> Subject: [LDS-WC] nFS > 1.Are you entering the information you have on living members of your > family such as cousins and their children that are nonmembers on nFS? > 2.Also, something else that is a curiosity to me. Some of the work that I > sent in years before the duplicate work was performed now have later dates > for confirm. and initiatories. These ordinances were performed at the > time baptisims and endowments were performed, right?? It's not a problem > but it is a curiosity every time I run across this. > Thank you, Joan > > ____________________________________________________________ > Everything looks better on a beautiful new projector screen! Click now! > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTJHllLtAvHUahW4BfMlvLedGq4ave0Nqqe1hobxaPi8luPLlPpjE0/ > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

MIles, The earliesat date is the only valid date. Any later dates for same ordinances are not valid at all. Once is once, and that was and is the intent of the nFS to do away with duplications. It's valid if it is correct merged record. David Samuelsen Miles Meyer wrote: > > 2. If you use a program like AncestralQuest you can see the number of > times that the ordinances have been performed for individuals. nFS has > to choose one of the dates and it might not be the date you did the > work. However, in AQ you can choose which date you want to show in > your own files. I usually choose the earliest date but nFS may choose > one later for it display. > > Miles Meyer

1. We have been told not to add any more living people in nFS than is necessary to tie lines together. Entering dates for living cousins is not necessary and probably not very useful. You are the only person who can see the information you enter on living people. If they were members, their data is already included in nFS from church membership records, however since they are living you can't see them. If you have entered information on living individuals you would have to combine all of the duplicates entered in nFS from all the cousins that entered the information once they die. 2. If you use a program like AncestralQuest you can see the number of times that the ordinances have been performed for individuals. nFS has to choose one of the dates and it might not be the date you did the work. However, in AQ you can choose which date you want to show in your own files. I usually choose the earliest date but nFS may choose one later for it display. Miles Meyer On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:01 AM, phlander2@juno.com<phlander2@juno.com> wrote: > 1.Are you entering the information you have on living members of your family such as cousins and their children that are nonmembers on nFS? > 2.Also, something else that is a curiosity to me. Some of the work that I sent in years before the duplicate work was performed now have later dates for confirm. and initiatories.  These ordinances were performed at the time baptisims and endowments were performed, right?? It's not a problem but it is a curiosity every time I run across this. > Thank you, Joan > > ____________________________________________________________ > Everything looks better on a beautiful new projector screen! Click now! > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTJHllLtAvHUahW4BfMlvLedGq4ave0Nqqe1hobxaPi8luPLlPpjE0/ > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

The NFS "Conditions of Use" states that you must have permission from any living persons that you enter data on even though you are the only person who should be able to view it. "Permission from Living Persons. Whenever you contribute genealogical data to FamilySearch, you affirm that you have received permission from all living persons whose data you are contributing to give their personal information to FamilySearch and GSU under the terms of this Agreement. You are the only one that can view information that you contribute about living persons." I personally have not entered any living persons though some of them show up as entries made by Ancestral File contributions. My Father's siblings are now all deceased but at the time of the contribution I am almost positive that they were living. Nancy Scott Cincinnati, Ohio -----Original Message----- From: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of phlander2@juno.com Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 11:01 AM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: [LDS-WC] nFS 1.Are you entering the information you have on living members of your family such as cousins and their children that are nonmembers on nFS? 2.Also, something else that is a curiosity to me. Some of the work that I sent in years before the duplicate work was performed now have later dates for confirm. and initiatories. These ordinances were performed at the time baptisims and endowments were performed, right?? It's not a problem but it is a curiosity every time I run across this. Thank you, Joan ____________________________________________________________ Everything looks better on a beautiful new projector screen! Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTJHllLtAvHUahW4BfMlvLedGq4 ave0Nqqe1hobxaPi8luPLlPpjE0/ Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I guess this is one of my major blunders - but ok, I am sure I can remove all living without too much effort. Helle -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] På vegne af Helle Thor Hirschmann Sendt: 8. juni 2009 17:09 Til: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Emne: Re: [LDS-WC] nFS 1. Yes I enter the information on all my living relatives and also extended family - but I leave the death information empty - mostly I do not know the dates anyway. Because then it is much easier for my children to take over at a later time and other relatives. With no death dates no-one else can see the information that is in my file anyway. Helle

Sorry I was not clear. The grandson was sealed to him as her husband, not her grandson. Doris ----- Original Message ----- From: W. David Samuelsen<mailto:dsam52@sampubco.com> To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com<mailto:lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] Incorrect sealings They are permitted to be sealed to grandparents per regulations IF grandparents raised them instead of their birth parents. David Samuelsen DORIS BATEMAN wrote: > Pheobe, I had a grandson sealed to his grandmother, (as a duplication, both had already been sealed to the correct people) and the NFS support people fixed the records. Took about a month and lots of explanations. Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

They are permitted to be sealed to grandparents per regulations IF grandparents raised them instead of their birth parents. David Samuelsen DORIS BATEMAN wrote: > Pheobe, I had a grandson sealed to his grandmother, (as a duplication, both had already been sealed to the correct people) and the NFS support people fixed the records. Took about a month and lots of explanations.