The Salt Lake Temple is not yet fully in preparation yet. Only certain stakes are. I was told that those stakes in the Salt Lake Temple district that have at least one consultant in each ward in the stake are getting access to it. The others are not yet. My own stake has not been given access yet ... because only one of our seven wards has even one consultant called .. and it's NOT my own ward. > From: jncrandell@broadweave.net > To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:02:12 -0600 > Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] Draper Temple early access to nFS > > Sue wrote: > The registered consultants in the Draper Utah temple district received > emails today giving them early access to nFS and access to the training! > > Nancy Scott sent me this link recently: > http://75.101.166.20/utahidaho/news_updates.html > > Based on the information at that link, and adding Draper to the list now, it > would appear that only Jordan River, Idaho Falls, and Provo are not yet in > the preparation stages. I'm anxious to see how long it takes to get those > last three in process. They're big ones, so we'll see! > > Jill Crandell > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Harry wrote: Jill am I understanding that Family Tree will replace NFS? Yes, that is the direction it is moving. There are many features in nFS that are not yet functional in Family Tree, so the transition will wait until the programming is finished. They are already calling nFS the "classic" new FamilySearch, and it hasn't even finished the roll-out! I've already gotten attached to classic nFS, and I'm having trouble transitioning to Family Tree, but I have to say that I absolutely love the way Family Tree handles the ordinance list rather than the pages we get in nFS. However, I like the ordinance selection process in nFS. I'm hoping that is a feature that will be activated in Family Tree in future versions. We're all just going to have to hang on for the ride, and continue to give our feedback as we move forward. Jill Crandell

Sue wrote: The registered consultants in the Draper Utah temple district received emails today giving them early access to nFS and access to the training! Nancy Scott sent me this link recently: http://75.101.166.20/utahidaho/news_updates.html Based on the information at that link, and adding Draper to the list now, it would appear that only Jordan River, Idaho Falls, and Provo are not yet in the preparation stages. I'm anxious to see how long it takes to get those last three in process. They're big ones, so we'll see! Jill Crandell

Denise wrote: I apologize for this question, (I'm sure it's been addressed), but if someone could clear up something. I was under the impression that Utah/Idaho was not going to learn NFS, but be directly introduced to FamilyTree. (several articles LDS and non-LDS have alluded to that). Is Utah/Idaho training in NFS? Denise, I live in Provo and teach at BYU. I asked that very question because the changeover appears to be so close. I wanted to be able to teach my students one program, not two. It's not going to happen. There is still too much time to get FamilyTree fully functional, so those coming onto the system in the next few months will learn NFS for the features that have to be used there, and FamilyTree because that is where it is going. You folks were able to learn one at a time, but the members here will need to learn two at once. It's going to be a great adventure! Jill Crandell

David wrote: I think this is one of those cases where the use of a small GedCOM applies. I did not take the time to check the KDs; however, my recollection is that nFS will accept ordinance information via a GedCOM and show the work as complete. Patron submitted information is over-written by anything which comes from Temple Records. I'm always willing to try something new, and I hadn't thought about doing this. So, I created a one person GEDCOM showing the unrecorded sealing date, imported it, and merged it with the record in nFS. I then looked at the ordinance information and it still said "in progress." Next, I went to FamilyTree to see what was recorded there, and it still says "in progress." I really think that while it is in progress, there is nothing that will change it. If it said "ready," I could hand enter or use a GEDCOM, but once it's in progress, nothing touches it. In my case, even the temple recording has been confirmed, it just isn't showing in the nFS system. I'll just wait, because I know the work was done. In the meantime, it will look to others like I'm sitting on it and doing nothing. :-/ Jill Crandell

We just had a brother in our stake pass away age 107. He was present at the dedication of the Copenhagen temple - at that time about 10 years older than President Hinckley. I felt that Pres. Hinckley was kind of thrilled being together with someone someone that much older. We are not struggling so much for making a living as they were in past generations. Helle Denmark > People are just living longer, so we need to go by the rules, which will > probably change in the near future.  Does anyone remember how old that > lady from France was when she passed?  Something like 125 years old! > > > From: W. David Samuelsen <dsam52@sampubco.com> > Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's > ordinances > To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com > Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 11:06 AM > > > That happpened to my cousin, too. And still very much living. > > Wasted no time using feedback to notify and even giving the support the > phone number of cousin's daughter (she's over 80 years old) to contact > to confirm. The information and ordinances were yanked from the nFS, > leaving only information for her daughter who has access. The ordinances > were by a distant cousin. > > David Samuelsen > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

No it was definitely him, his birthdate, his parents. And he is in his mid-seventies. Doris ----- Original Message ----- From: Jorge Todeschini<mailto:jorgetodeschini@hotmail.com> To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com<mailto:lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances Could it just be someone with the same name, or is there more overlapping data? From: DORIS BATEMAN Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:26 PM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com<mailto:lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com> Subject: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances I really had a surprise yesterday. I helped one of our staff members at Ogden FHC sign up for NFS. We have just been given access, but I have had access for over a year. When he looked at his own record, he was shocked to find out that he was in the system twice, once as a live member and once (I presume as deceased; as his name was not in italics). There was no death date showing, and he was even more shocked to find out that someone whose code name he did not recognize had done his baptism; and his endowment was "in progress" even though he had done his own work years ago. This gentleman was in his mid 70's. Of course, we sent it on to through feedback for help from the programmers. Does anyone know if they can contact the person who is doing this and cancel the card that is made out? To me it really points out the importance of following the 95/110 rules we have been talking about and making sure to teach our people that when we do descendency research that we are careful about these rules. Doris Bateman Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

That fits with what I was told by someone "in the know" in the Las Vegas Temple after I attended a session while on business there last week. I was told that the push is on to have all the remainder of the temples and stakes in Idaho and Utah up and going by the end of July. By the way .. I took a FOR to Las Vegas with me and used it when I went through the session there. The new procedure is FANTASTIC and soooooo easy. > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:38:21 -0600 > From: smaxwl@earthlink.net > To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com > Subject: [LDS-WC] Draper Temple early access to nFS > > Just thought I'd pass the word that nFS is moving very fast in > Utah/Idaho. The registered consultants in the Draper Utah temple > district received emails today giving them early access to nFS and > access to the training! I know that the Draper temple will have their > software installed to handle FOR's on July 14th, so, I would bet we go > live soon after that! > > SueM > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Jill am I understanding that Family Tree will replace NFS? Harry in Tucson WE should all be thankful for what we have. We can only truly know who we are when we learn our past --- On Thu, 6/18/09, Jill N. Crandell <jncrandell@broadweave.net> wrote: From: Jill N. Crandell <jncrandell@broadweave.net> Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] NFS in Utah To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 9:59 PM Denise wrote: I apologize for this question, (I'm sure it's been addressed), but if someone could clear up something. I was under the impression that Utah/Idaho was not going to learn NFS, but be directly introduced to FamilyTree. (several articles LDS and non-LDS have alluded to that). Is Utah/Idaho training in NFS? Denise, I live in Provo and teach at BYU. I asked that very question because the changeover appears to be so close. I wanted to be able to teach my students one program, not two. It's not going to happen. There is still too much time to get FamilyTree fully functional, so those coming onto the system in the next few months will learn NFS for the features that have to be used there, and FamilyTree because that is where it is going. You folks were able to learn one at a time, but the members here will need to learn two at once. It's going to be a great adventure! Jill Crandell Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I apologize for this question, (I'm sure it's been addressed), but if someone could clear up something.  I was under the impression that Utah/Idaho was not going to learn NFS, but be directly introduced to FamilyTree. (several articles LDS and non-LDS have alluded to that).  Is Utah/Idaho training in NFS?   Thank you for your patience. Denise

Jill et. al. I think this is one of those cases where the use of a small GedCOM applies. I did not take the time to check the KDs; however, my recollection is that nFS will accept ordinance information via a GedCOM and show the work as complete. Patron submitted information is over-written by anything which comes from Temple Records. David, San Diego district ---- "Jill N. Crandell" <jncrandell@broadweave.net> wrote: Nancy wrote: If you want to keep the B & C from being redone by anyone who sees it in NFS for now until it is straightened out, you could go to FS FamilyTree and enter the data yourself as having been completed at least for the women. <snip> Nancy and everyone interested, I have had this same problem. I had a full batch of sealings that were performed two years ago in the Provo Temple, and four of the ordinances have never shown up in NFS. I asked the temple with the cards in hand, and I believe in my case, the ordinances were recorded. I actually sent feedback this morning to ask again, and I'm hoping they will find the "lost" recordings. As for adding it to FamilyTree, there is actually a problem with that. If the work shows as "Ready," you can add the information and the program will then indicate that the work has been completed. However, if it says "In progress," you can't add the data because the option to add it is not available. So, mine shows in progress, when in fact it's completed, but I can't add the information myself because the button isn't there. Ain't it great!?!? Anyway, I'll let you know what I hear back. If you can't add the data on a "ready" ordinance for some reason, I would reserve it and don't print the FOR. If ordinance dates are added later, this will drop out of your reserved file without duplicating the work. At least, that is what has happened for me. <snip> As for recording ordinances by hand, I believe they are using that process to locate missing batches of ordinances. Anything we add by hand, they can then go find in the system and figure out why it isn't showing. Theoretically, the official recordings will be found and brought into the system, and then our hand entries will go away. So, our entries are not "official," but they are preventing duplication while glitches in the system are being resolved. Jill Crandell

Hi listers: Please! As the original plea was to have some way to contact people as they come on-line encourage the members to do so as you help them register for nFS. For everyone worried about junk - spam - and so on there are many venues to access a free e-mail account which you may use only for your nFS contact. Personally I have one on hotmail, on yahoo, and netscape (yes, that one has been around a long time) as well as the account with my service provider. I use the netscape account for all those business which request an e-account for contact this makes it oh so easy to dump the junk. The key here is to visit the account on a regular basis to keep it active. So, if your worried about it then please get a free account and go into your profile on nFS to put that e-address into your contact information. And, check it occasionally to see who you may be working with on a family line. This has been a real blessing to me and mine as we journey into nFS. I'm now in contact with cousins I never knew of in all the family reunions we've had over the years. ---- "B. Jackson" wrote: Only thing is if they share our email addresses we may all get even more junk mail than we do now! Barbi ----- Original Message ----- From: Paula Goodfellow Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] For the folks at NFS I sent four two nights ago, and haven't heard back from any. Of course it's summer, so some might be traveling. Paula On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:44 PM, DC & Alice Allen wrote: > Now if there were only a way to get them to ANSWER those emails............... > I've only been contacted about twice, but made sure to answer. > Alice > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > On 6/17/2009 at 10:59 PM JCBrooks@aol.com wrote: > <snip> >> So...NFS folks...please REQUIRE an email or snail mail in order to register so we can get in touch with one another !! :-)

It hasn't been too long ago I came across the work for someone born in 1920. The name had been submitted with an ESTIMATED birth date of 1892! Estimating for the a time near the allowed dates is a dicey thing to be doing, also. Jerry

Just thought I'd pass the word that nFS is moving very fast in Utah/Idaho. The registered consultants in the Draper Utah temple district received emails today giving them early access to nFS and access to the training! I know that the Draper temple will have their software installed to handle FOR's on July 14th, so, I would bet we go live soon after that! SueM

Could it just be someone with the same name, or is there more overlapping data? From: DORIS BATEMAN Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:26 PM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances I really had a surprise yesterday. I helped one of our staff members at Ogden FHC sign up for NFS. We have just been given access, but I have had access for over a year. When he looked at his own record, he was shocked to find out that he was in the system twice, once as a live member and once (I presume as deceased; as his name was not in italics). There was no death date showing, and he was even more shocked to find out that someone whose code name he did not recognize had done his baptism; and his endowment was "in progress" even though he had done his own work years ago. This gentleman was in his mid 70's. Of course, we sent it on to through feedback for help from the programmers. Does anyone know if they can contact the person who is doing this and cancel the card that is made out? To me it really points out the importance of following the 95/110 rules we have been talking about and making sure to teach our people that when we do descendency research that we are careful about these rules. Doris Bateman Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Absolutely about the 95/110 year rules. We all just have to slow down on the "Ready" signals or we will be producing more duplications than ever and in this case improper submissions. Kind of like the "paperless" computer idea where people just print more and faster. I am hoping that my Bishop will allow me to put an insert about the 95/110 rule into the bulletin on Father's Day. I spent a lot of time making up the insert with footnotes even. It fits 2 copies landscape on paper. Anyone interested in an attachment of it, I will send it to you offline. You can contact me offline at: nascott@cinci.rr.com Nancy Scott Cincinnati, Ohio -----Original Message----- From: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of DORIS BATEMAN Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:27 AM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances I really had a surprise yesterday. I helped one of our staff members at Ogden FHC sign up for NFS. We have just been given access, but I have had access for over a year. When he looked at his own record, he was shocked to find out that he was in the system twice, once as a live member and once (I presume as deceased; as his name was not in italics). There was no death date showing, and he was even more shocked to find out that someone whose code name he did not recognize had done his baptism; and his endowment was "in progress" even though he had done his own work years ago. This gentleman was in his mid 70's. Of course, we sent it on to through feedback for help from the programmers. Does anyone know if they can contact the person who is doing this and cancel the card that is made out? To me it really points out the importance of following the 95/110 rules we have been talking about and making sure to teach our people that when we do descendency research that we are careful about these rules. Doris Bateman Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

PJS:  I would like a copy ... thank you ... Phoebe Stages ________________________________ From: Nancy Scott <nascott@cinci.rr.com> To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:52:15 AM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances Absolutely about the 95/110 year rules. We all just have to slow down on the "Ready" signals or we will be producing more duplications than ever and in this case improper submissions.  Kind of like the "paperless" computer idea where people just print more and faster. I am hoping that my Bishop will allow me to put an insert about the 95/110 rule into the bulletin on Father's Day.  I spent a lot of time making up the insert with footnotes even.  It fits 2 copies landscape on paper.  Anyone interested in an attachment of it, I will send it to you offline.  You can contact me offline at:  nascott@cinci.rr.com Nancy Scott Cincinnati, Ohio -----Original Message----- From: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of DORIS BATEMAN Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:27 AM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances I really had a surprise yesterday.  I helped one of our staff members at Ogden FHC sign up for NFS.  We have just been given access, but I have had access for over a year.  When he looked at his own record, he was shocked to find out that he was in the system twice, once as a live member and once (I presume as deceased; as his name was not in italics).  There was no death date showing, and he was even more shocked to find out that someone whose code name he did not recognize had done his baptism; and his endowment was "in progress" even though he had done his own work years ago.  This gentleman was in his mid 70's.  Of course, we sent it on to through feedback for help from the programmers.  Does anyone know if they can contact the person who is doing this and cancel the card that is made out? To me it really points out the importance of following the 95/110 rules we have been talking about and making sure to teach our people that when we do descendency research that we are careful about these rules.  Doris Bateman Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

What an exciting day for this sister and her son. After the sister has met with the bishop, she will be given a recommend for living ordinances. She should then call the temple and set up the time for her initiatory and endowment (plus sealing if applicable). Calling the temple is the first step towards receiving ordinances for a living person. The temple recorder or the office staff will make the appointment, mail out a letter with what the member needs to do or bring. Meanwhile, the sister or her son should use New FamilySearch and submit the deceased brother's name for ordinances. If the baptism and confirmation are already done, the initiatory and endowment ordinances will be cleared. (If he was not baptized or confirmed these ordinances need to be done too -- before the day that the sister goes to the temple for her own ordinances.) In our Detroit Temple, consultants have been asked to prepare a family group record for the family if there is a sealing which will occur. (The family group record is just used by the temple to generate their own records and doesn't become part of the official records of the temple.) All deceased individuals on the family group record have their information processed through New FamilySearch. A family ordinance request is created for these individuals. The ordinances can then begin for these deceased family members -- so that they are ready for the endowment session when the living sister/brother attends the temple for their own ordinances. If the sister is going to be sealed to her own parents that same day, she needs to have the individual ordinances completed for her mother and father before they can be sealed together. The temple's sealer will seal the parents together if all the other work is completed. Then the sister may be sealed to the parents. The sister needs to be sealed to her spouse for the deceased and/or living sons to be sealed to her. The best thing to do is telephone the temple and clarify what needs to be done. If the sister has questions and doesn't understand exactly what is needed or will happen, the consultant can telephone the temple recorder or the office staff to verify the procedures. Good luck!! Best wishes to the sister on her special day at the temple!! Mary Scott Northville Ward Westland Michigan Stake Detroit Michigan Temple District   ________________________________ From: "susanne@katskraft.com" <susanne@katskraft.com> To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:12:36 PM Subject: [LDS-WC] Fw: Question... ----- Original Message ----- From: susanne@katskraft.com To: www.lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Cc: susanne@katskraft.com Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:52 PM Subject: Question... It has been a while that I have helped prepare someone to get their own ordinance work done in the Temple. This sister is going to get her ordinance work on June 30. She has a son who wishes to take his deceased brother's name to get his work done at the same time. What is the current procedures to take to make this all come together? Thanks, Susanne Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Nancy, I would love to have that attachment if you would like to share. Jennifer My Genealogy/Family History Blog: http://jacksbox4you.blogspot.com ________________________________ From: Nancy Scott <nascott@cinci.rr.com> To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:52:15 AM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances Absolutely about the 95/110 year rules. We all just have to slow down on the "Ready" signals or we will be producing more duplications than ever and in this case improper submissions. Kind of like the "paperless" computer idea where people just print more and faster. I am hoping that my Bishop will allow me to put an insert about the 95/110 rule into the bulletin on Father's Day. I spent a lot of time making up the insert with footnotes even. It fits 2 copies landscape on paper. Anyone interested in an attachment of it, I will send it to you offline. You can contact me offline at: nascott@cinci.rr.com Nancy Scott Cincinnati, Ohio -----Original Message----- From: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of DORIS BATEMAN Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:27 AM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: [LDS-WC] NFS shows someone else doing live member's ordinances I really had a surprise yesterday. I helped one of our staff members at Ogden FHC sign up for NFS. We have just been given access, but I have had access for over a year. When he looked at his own record, he was shocked to find out that he was in the system twice, once as a live member and once (I presume as deceased; as his name was not in italics). There was no death date showing, and he was even more shocked to find out that someone whose code name he did not recognize had done his baptism; and his endowment was "in progress" even though he had done his own work years ago. This gentleman was in his mid 70's. Of course, we sent it on to through feedback for help from the programmers. Does anyone know if they can contact the person who is doing this and cancel the card that is made out? To me it really points out the importance of following the 95/110 rules we have been talking about and making sure to teach our people that when we do descendency research that we are careful about these rules. Doris Bateman Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thank goodness! It was nice of you to respond. I hope your weather is nicer than my cold rainy day! Barbi ----- Original Message ----- From: Frances Swendsen To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] For the folks at NFS We don't share e-mail addresses with anyone. Frances FH Consultant Area Support Missionary -----Original Message----- From: lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lds-ward-consultant-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of B. Jackson Sent: June 18, 2009 9:10 AM To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] For the folks at NFS Only thing is if they share our email addresses we may all get even more junk mail than we do now! Barbi ----- Original Message ----- From: Paula Goodfellow To: lds-ward-consultant@rootsweb.com Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [LDS-WC] For the folks at NFS I sent four two nights ago, and haven't heard back from any. Of course it's summer, so some might be traveling. Paula On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:44 PM, DC & Alice Allen wrote: > Now if there were only a way to get them to ANSWER those > emails............... > > While it seems that most of the ones I want to contact are in Utah & > Idaho and not rolled out yet, once in a while I find someone who has > an email contact. But I've only been successful in getting an > answer out of one person. > > I've only been contacted about twice, but made sure to answer. > > Alice > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 6/17/2009 at 10:59 PM JCBrooks@aol.com wrote: > > <snip> >> >> So...NFS folks...please REQUIRE an email or snail mail in order to >> register >> so we can get in touch with one another !! :-) >> >> Michele > > > > > Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Please send the one word message SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-L-REQUEST@ROOTSWEB.COM ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LDS-WARD-CONSULTANT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message