Well, I don't know about stuff under the Crown being technically in Britain, seems to me they just counted it. But in the case of Aden, it is surprising how far the concept of "British India" stretched. Simply for convenience, at various times and for various purposes, British India (which is a legal term and is not the same as India) included Burma, and lots of other places including, as you see, Aden. See the FIBIwiki entry on http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Aden Adrian On 11 October 2015 at 18:29, Penny Trueman via <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > At the top of the entries for the page it says: - > ..."entries in the Register of Burials belonging to and kept at the Church > or station of Aden (Point) within the Archdeaconry and Diocese of > Bombay..." > > As far as I know Aden is in the Yemen and Bombay (Mumbai) is in India. > Was this a case similar to foreign military/naval censuses coming under the > Crown (and therefore technically in England)? > ... >