Thanks to those of you who commented on the ‘archaic’ wording on the Licence to Marry Obligation. It is still a little ‘over the top’ even by modern legal parlance! I should run it by my son-in-law, an attorney, for his opinion. Apart from all else, this Marry of Obligation Licence is something. Some researcher friends and I have never heard of such. The ‘fine’ of £200 seems like such an unbelievable amount for those times (1762), and would certainly be an impediment to entering into a marriage without being on the up and up. ‘Be sure your sins will find you out!’ The Borthwick Institute (York, England) archivist quickly addressed my enquiry in a very polite manner. I have had excellent response from them, The Mitchell Library, Glasgow and the Maryland State Archives (USA). As records cover 1762, 1860s and 1880s, I consider myself fortunate to have made as much headway as I have...if only I were a better “sleuth,” however. Much credit is due those who unstintingly offer their time and talents to help me along. ‘The Borthwick Institute for Archives is one of the biggest archive repositories outside London. During our 50 year history we have collected archives from all around the world, from the 12th century to the present day.’ ... for more information go to the links: http://www.york.ac.uk/library/borthwick/about-us/ http://www.origins.net/help/aboutNWI-ymed-bi.aspx Maisie