Hi Ian, Sorry, I mistakenly titled notes as "Note 72" twice. Sadly, I don't think these can be corrected, but pages 44-47 are in there, as a second "Note 72". Jim Bundy -------------------------------------------------- From: "Ian Mair" <r.i.mair@bigpond.net.au> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:33 PM To: <lanark@rootsweb.com> Subject: Re: [Lanark] Shotts Parish Register 1707-1855 Note 73 > Hi Jim and others, > > I have been checking my records and the archives and can't find a > reference > to "Shotts Parish Register 1707-1855 Note 73" from Jim Bundy, covering > pages > 47-49. > > Have I missed a posting or did it go astray? > > Cheers > Ian > > > ------------------------------- > > LANARK, SCOTLAND MAILING LIST > > > LIST TOPIC: The discussion and research of genealogy or history > information pertaining to Lanark, Scotland at any point in its history. > > WHEN REPLYING to any list post please remember to snip most of the earlier > message before you post any reply > > LIST INFORMATION PAGE: Contact the List Admin at > lanark-admin@rootsweb.com; or to search the list archives, get information > on subscribing or unsubscribing, or to obtain other useful information to > help you use the list more effectively, please click on the following link > to the list information page online: > > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks Jim, I have now tracked it down. I should have looked more closely at the second "Note 72". Also, many thanks for your monumental effort in transcribing the registers. They are a great asset. Cheers Ian -----Original Message----- From: lanark-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:lanark-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jim Bundy Sent: Saturday, 10 July 2010 3:55 PM To: lanark@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [Lanark] Shotts Parish Register 1707-1855 Note 73 Hi Ian, Sorry, I mistakenly titled notes as "Note 72" twice. Sadly, I don't think these can be corrected, but pages 44-47 are in there, as a second "Note 72". Jim Bundy