RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [Lanark] Generic vs specific notations on census, etc.
    2. Jo Ann Croft via
    3. Those were the instructions given to the enumerators. We don't know why the government did it that way. Somewhere on the freecen.org.uk website(s) are each years instructions. Jo-Ann On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Maisie Egger via <lanark@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Irked! > > I have been looking at some Scottish marriage and census documents wherein > anyone born in Scotland has the particular district or county identified. > Oftentimes, however, if the person came from Ireland or England (or Wales > even), there is no specific area denoted. For example on a Scottish > census: Jane Doe, born Hamilton, John Doe, born Ireland. > > The same applies to an “English” boat passenger list, as another > example: William Doe, born Leeds, but John Doe, Ireland- no particular > place in Ireland. Those on my tree born in the Southwest of Scotland who > were employed in England in the 1800s were listed on the English census as > being born in Scotland, but other English domestics in the same household > were defined specifically as born is Blackpool, Harrowgate, and so on, not > a ‘generic’ England. Is there some reason for this? > > Maisie > > >

    03/30/2016 09:24:27