I worked in an office at 144 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow; however, the iconic ‘hatrack’ listed building is advertised at 144 St. Vincent Street. Other advertisting has it at 142a-144 St. Vincent Street. They are two separate, though conjoined, buildings entirely. The ‘hatrack’ is so named because of its unique architectural features resembling a hatrack at the top of the building. By contrast, 144 St. Vincent Street was more prosaic, shall we say, though a very substantial looking red sandstone building, the likes of which once gave Glasgow the reputation for being the finest Victorian city in G.B. Question: Is there a reason that two different buildings of architectural design adjoining each other should have a misleading number system now? There was no confusion when I was a wee office lassie in a solicitor’s office in the 1940s. I was the proverbial go-fer and delivered letters all over the centre of town and beyond, even up to Park Circus where genealogy offices were located (now at the Mitchell Library, I believe). Maisie