No, and no. Am I correct in inferring that you are using the partial transcriptions on ancestry of earlier censuses as authoritative sources of genalogical information? If so, you need to be aware that these transcriptions are notorious for their inaccuracies. They are an invaluable aid to finding families in the various censuses, but having found people in a transcription is it absolutely essential to plan to look at the original on the Scotland's People web site to make sure you do have the correct information. I have found some seriously weird transcriptions on ancestry.com - for example a family named Ballantyne transcribed as Lezzenbyre! Also a grain merchant aged 3 - you would have thought that even the dimmest of transcribers would have realised that could not be correct and at least marked it with a question mark. Anne ----- Original Message ----- From: "lafinken via" <lanark@rootsweb.com> To: <LANARK@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:29 PM Subject: [Lanark] 1911 census > So the 1911 census census of Scotland is not on ancestry.com > yet? Is there a release date coming soon by any chance? > > Thanks > > ------------------------------- > > WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the > earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as > LANARK@Rootsweb.com. > > You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or > click on the following link to the list information page > online: > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2015.0.6189 / Virus Database: 4565/12171 - Release > Date: 05/05/16 >