Ah've bin toashtin as fasht ash ah can ... hic! Ken Harrison North Vancouver, Canada -----Original Message----- From: LANARK [mailto:lanark-bounces+kenharrison43=shaw.ca@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of ruth.enns@shaw.ca Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:52 PM To: lanark@rootsweb.com Subject: [Lanark] Did we forget? to toast our famous bard with all the talk of the K.K.K? Cheers Robbie, your words & wisdom will outlast us all!! Ruth ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

to toast our famous bard with all the talk of the K.K.K? Cheers Robbie, your words & wisdom will outlast us all!! Ruth

I happened to catch this program almost accidentally Neil Oliver presents it and is thought provoking to say the least Its on BBC Iplayer entitled Scotland & the Klan Available for the next 28 days Description Scotland has exported many great things to the rest of the world, and people like Neil Oliver have often celebrated the disproportionate impact of its ideas and energy on places like America. The role of Scots in shaping the concept of the American Dream is a story often told, but could Scottish settlers have also had a hand in America's racist nightmare? Neil Oliver travels over 2,000 miles to examine links between racism today in the Deep South and the Scottish settlers that first occupied it. Throughout the 18th century, hundreds of thousands of Scots emigrated to America, and some believe that it was their wariness and moral certainty that significantly shaped the south into an isolated, fearful society that easily took to slave-owning when the opportunity came. Walter Scott, the creator of a romantic vision of the 'Old Country' is blamed for reinforcing their fantasy world of Georgian gentility. When that world was threatened, the southern states opted for civil war rather than give it up. After the devastating war, attitudes in the south were hardened by defeat and fear of the now-freed slaves. When six Scottish-American former Confederate officers formed a fraternal society, clan turned to Klan. The oldest and most feared racist hate group in America - the Ku Klux Klan - was born. Now, well over 800 hate groups stalk the United States, and Neil finishes his journey by visiting the Neo-Confederate League of the South. The League advocates a return to a separate southern society run by what they call 'Anglo Celts', and Neil discovers that here Scottishness still abides and that attitudes don't seem to have changed much in the last 200-300 years. I don't think Burns would be overly pleased at the use of his words in their beliefs -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Interesting reading at the breakfast table!! Thank you ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington.one@gmail.com> To: <lanark@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 7:30 AM Subject: [Lanark] Burns & the KKK > > I happened to catch this program almost accidentally > > Neil Oliver presents it and is thought provoking to say the least > > Its on BBC Iplayer entitled Scotland & the Klan > > Available for the next 28 days > > Description > > > Scotland has exported many great things to the rest of the world, and > people like Neil Oliver have often celebrated the disproportionate impact > of its ideas and energy on places like America. The role of Scots in > shaping the concept of the American Dream is a story often told, but could > Scottish settlers have also had a hand in America's racist nightmare? > > Neil Oliver travels over 2,000 miles to examine links between racism today > in the Deep South and the Scottish settlers that first occupied it. > Throughout the 18th century, hundreds of thousands of Scots emigrated to > America, and some believe that it was their wariness and moral certainty > that significantly shaped the south into an isolated, fearful society that > easily took to slave-owning when the opportunity came. > > Walter Scott, the creator of a romantic vision of the 'Old Country' is > blamed for reinforcing their fantasy world of Georgian gentility. When > that world was threatened, the southern states opted for civil war rather > than give it up. After the devastating war, attitudes in the south were > hardened by defeat and fear of the now-freed slaves. When six > Scottish-American former Confederate officers formed a fraternal society, > clan turned to Klan. > > The oldest and most feared racist hate group in America - the Ku Klux > Klan - was born. Now, well over 800 hate groups stalk the United States, > and Neil finishes his journey by visiting the Neo-Confederate League of > the South. The League advocates a return to a separate southern society > run by what they call 'Anglo Celts', and Neil discovers that here > Scottishness still abides and that attitudes don't seem to have changed > much in the last 200-300 years. > > > > I don't think Burns would be overly pleased at the use of his words in > their beliefs > > -- > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > ------------------------------- > > WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier > message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. > > You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on > the following link to the list information page online: > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > >

Sorry should have readThank you everyone for your suggestions.  Much Appreciated.Take Care Margaret From: Margaret McNab <margmcnab@rogers.com> To: LANARK- List <LANARK@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:48 AM Subject: [Lanark] Spitting ftm ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Well, as it's quite some time since I experimented with FTM, perhaps they have sorted out that particular problem. I'll take a look at Ancestral Quest. Thank you. Anne From: Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> To: lanark@rootsweb.com Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2017, 11:54 Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. Sorry Anne but thats just not true FTM is no harder to use to export or report on the contents than any other software I still use PAF for preference myself but have tried most of the other packages Personally I didn't see any advantage to using Legacy or Rootsmagic over FTM (and some disadvantage) but we are all different so what suits one doesn't suit another Ancestral Quest is well worth looking at (they wrote PAF in the first place) it can read a PAF file as is which is useful but has more up to date features and reporting functions Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 08-Jan-17 10:05 AM, anne.genlists@btinternet.com wrote: > That's the reason I stopped using FTM - I found it impossible to > export just part of my tree and I didn't want to send the whole thing > to people. I suggest you get another program, export your whole tree > into that, and then use that to select the bits you want to give to > the other person. I am still using PAF, which is no longer available, > but you can get basic Rootsmagic and Legacy (among others) free of > charge online and experment with them without risking damage to your > main tree. Anne ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Something missing?? Ruth -----Original Message----- From: Margaret McNab Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 5:48 AM To: LANARK- List Subject: [Lanark] Spitting ftm ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This Christmas I used FTM to put together booklets for my sister and her husband of their respective trees. As Nivard says it was simple to go into publish and pull up a descendant report for each family, download it as a Pdf and print. The only common information was that of their marriage. Once you have generated the report they can be saved in FTM and used again. Susan -----Original Message----- From: LANARK [mailto:lanark-bounces+rmshamilton=bigpond.com@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2017 9:55 PM To: lanark@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. Sorry Anne but thats just not true FTM is no harder to use to export or report on the contents than any other software I still use PAF for preference myself but have tried most of the other packages Personally I didn't see any advantage to using Legacy or Rootsmagic over FTM (and some disadvantage) but we are all different so what suits one doesn't suit another Ancestral Quest is well worth looking at (they wrote PAF in the first place) it can read a PAF file as is which is useful but has more up to date features and reporting functions Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 08-Jan-17 10:05 AM, anne.genlists@btinternet.com wrote: > That's the reason I stopped using FTM - I found it impossible to > export just part of my tree and I didn't want to send the whole thing > to people. I suggest you get another program, export your whole tree > into that, and then use that to select the bits you want to give to > the other person. I am still using PAF, which is no longer available, > but you can get basic Rootsmagic and Legacy (among others) free of > charge online and experment with them without risking damage to your > main tree. Anne ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Sorry Anne but thats just not true FTM is no harder to use to export or report on the contents than any other software I still use PAF for preference myself but have tried most of the other packages Personally I didn't see any advantage to using Legacy or Rootsmagic over FTM (and some disadvantage) but we are all different so what suits one doesn't suit another Ancestral Quest is well worth looking at (they wrote PAF in the first place) it can read a PAF file as is which is useful but has more up to date features and reporting functions Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 08-Jan-17 10:05 AM, anne.genlists@btinternet.com wrote: > That's the reason I stopped using FTM - I found it impossible to > export just part of my tree and I didn't want to send the whole thing > to people. I suggest you get another program, export your whole tree > into that, and then use that to select the bits you want to give to > the other person. I am still using PAF, which is no longer available, > but you can get basic Rootsmagic and Legacy (among others) free of > charge online and experment with them without risking damage to your > main tree. Anne

That's the reason I stopped using FTM - I found it impossible to export just part of my tree and I didn't want to send the whole thing to people. I suggest you get another program, export your whole tree into that, and then use that to select the bits you want to give to the other person. I am still using PAF, which is no longer available, but you can get basic Rootsmagic and Legacy (among others) free of charge online and experment with them without risking damage to your main tree. Anne From: Margaret McNab <margmcnab@rogers.com> To: "lanark@rootsweb.com" <lanark@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2017, 21:12 Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. Hi Nivard,                   FTM 2014  Margaret       From: Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> To: lanark@rootsweb.com Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 3:54 PM Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree.   What software are you using? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 07-Jan-17 8:37 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: > I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) >  Margaret ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message   ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thank you everyone. As usual you have all been very helpful and fast too.Take Care Margaret From: Margaret McNab <margmcnab@rogers.com> To: LANARK- List <lanark@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 3:37 PM Subject: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold)   Margaret ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Margaret Open the tree in FTM Select the person you want as the head of the tree Select Publish from thr top tabs Second option is Genealogy Reports Select Descendent Report Select Create Report on the right When compiled, check its as you want it (it should only include the head person chosen and mention who he married) You can play around with variations but the one above will probably suffice When happy select print on the top right Select printer or pdf printer and save or print Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 07-Jan-17 9:12 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: > > Hi Nivard, FTM 2014 Margaret > > From: Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> > To: lanark@rootsweb.com > Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 3:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. > > What software are you using? > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 07-Jan-17 8:37 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: >> I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) >> Margaret

I want to thank everyone for their answers, just what I wanted. I have gone back to the certificate with blowing up really high, I think the stamp must be old or had some issues with it, but when blown up very high is showing like it is 199 Balornock Road on my relatives one but still looks like 189 on the other entry. I definitely think a dodgy or well worn stamp. With the answers of it being a stamp - first time I have found one, and have many died in the Royal Glasgow Infirmary which you would have thought would have a stamp - but the explanation about previous poor houses etc, explains lots. I have corrected my entry to read 133 Balornock Road, which is the Stobhill Hospital Many thanks for all your answers, it is amazing what you can find out many years later about the area of the time. Kind regards Ailsa Ailsa Corlett ailsa@st.net.au http://home.st.net.au/~ailsa alternative email if having trouble sending to my normal email is: ailsacorlett@gmail.com >-----Original Message----- >From: LANARK [mailto:lanark-bounces+ailsa=st.net.au@rootsweb.com] On >Behalf Of Ailsa Corlett >Sent: Friday, 6 January 2017 12:06 AM >To: Lanark mailing list >Subject: [Lanark] In 1962 was 183 Balornock Road Glasgow the Stobhill >Hospital > >Hoping someone can fix a query. > >I have a death certificate for 1962 in which not only my ancestor but >also another person also has the Stamp of 183 Balornock Road, Glasgow >(Usual >Residence) on it. Then of course it lists the usual residence of the >deceased. >Both people on this certificate died from Cerebral Thrombosis - >certified by Dr's. and informants where family members. > >Current maps lead me to Stobhill Hospital in 133 Balornock Road > >Does anyone know if the street address did change after this time, and >if it is most likely that both my ancestor and the other person really >did die in the Stobhill Hospital. > >This is a very clear Stamped produced address rather than a hand >written one. > >If anyone can clarify the current address to the old one (wikipedia only >lists as 133) I would be interested to know. Anyone requiring to look at >death certificate, please email me and I will forward. > >Registration district was in Springburn, Burgh of Glasgow > >thanks in advance. >regards >Ailsa > >Ailsa Corlett >ailsa@st.net.au >http://home.st.net.au/~ailsa >alternative email if having trouble sending to my normal email is: >ailsacorlett@gmail.com > > > > >------------------------------- > >WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier >message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. > >You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on >the following link to the list information page online: >http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK- >request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >the subject and the body of the message

Hi Nivard,                   FTM 2014  Margaret From: Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> To: lanark@rootsweb.com Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 3:54 PM Subject: Re: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. What software are you using? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 07-Jan-17 8:37 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: > I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) >  Margaret ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

What software are you using? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 07-Jan-17 8:37 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: > I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) > Margaret

I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold)   Margaret

On 1/7/2017 3:37 PM, Margaret McNab wrote: > I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) > Margaret Hi Margaret, there's a relatively simple and very quick way of doing this. The FILE tab of whatever program you use should have a drop-down menu which includes 'EXPORT' or "EXPORT A GEDCOM'. This allows you to creat and send to someone a "gedcom" file which contains ALL or A PART of your tree. When you click on EXPORT it should allow you to choose either WHOLE or PARTIAL. You want PARTIAL, so click that. /[the actual wording will differ depending on the program you use] /It will then ask you to select the root individual for this partial tree; you would select your _father_ from your tree's name list. Then it will ask you to select either "ancestors" or "descendants"; in your case you choose "ancestors". There will also be a field asking you how many generations (including your father) you wish to include. And there will be other fields asking, for example, whether you want all your "notes" or "document records" on individuals to be included in what you export. Once you've chosen the type of gedcom file you want to "export", you have to give it a name, and save it to your computer along with your other tree(s). Once you've made sure that this file is OK (by "importing" it into a temporary *blank* 'new' tree that you create) you can send it as an email attachment to your relatives. They can then IMPORT this gedcom file (using the drop down menu on _their_ tree program) into a *blank *new tree that they create [I say 'blank', but actually it needs one name - presumably your Dad's - as the root person; it should later be "merged" with that same name in _your_ tree]. Everything you've sent will then display as a tree in their program. Gedcoms are compatible with almost all brands of tree program. This new tree can be kept by them as a separate tree, or - if they so choose, and there have been no glitches - they can later IMPORT it into their own existing tree [or a duplicate copy of that tree, to be safe]. This may sound a bit complicated, but actually it only involves less than ten clicks of _your_ finger, and fewer of theirs. You can thus transfer a ton of information in no time at all. BTW, I myself use the now unobtainable "Ancestry Family Tree" program - downloaded free in the days before it was bought out and monetized by ancestry.com. It's almost 20 years old, and I love it, but there may be even simpler ways of doing these transfers nowadays. But believe me, exporting and importing gedcoms works very nicely across all programs that I've come across. Best of luck, John --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

If you have FTM  you can call them free phone and they'll talk you through it. Here in USA it's 1-800-ancestry. Jeannette in Florida Sent from my Virgin Mobile phone. On Jan 7, 2017 3:37 PM, Margaret McNab <margmcnab@rogers.com> wrote: > > I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold) >   Margaret > > ------------------------------- > > WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. > > You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

How about: 1. copy the whole file 2. on the copy only, delete the mother. This will split off all her side. 3. then copy all persons in the second file who connected to the child into a third file. 4. then on the third file, add the mother back 5. then send the third file to whomever 6. then delete the second (split) file completely. 7. then delete the third file as well. You should now have in your own file only the original, complete data. Ken Harrison North Vancouver, Canada -----Original Message----- From: LANARK [mailto:lanark-bounces+kenharrison43=shaw.ca@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Margaret McNab Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 12:37 PM To: LANARK- List Subject: [Lanark] Splitting a tree. I have my Maternal and my Paternal family on the one tree. I would like to send the  Paternal information to a relative but not necessarily include the Maternal side. Is this possible. ?The only solution I can come up with is to copy all the information onto a disc or stick and then delete the Material information. Probably be quite the chore. Any one have any better suggestions!Thank YouMargaret Ontario (Very Very cold)   Margaret ------------------------------- WHEN REPLYING to a post please remember to snip most of the earlier message. Be sure the reply to address shows as LANARK@Rootsweb.com. You may contact the List Admin at lanark-admin@rootsweb.com or click on the following link to the list information page online: http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/intl/SCT/LANARK.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LANARK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message