from www.ancestry.com search NIXON COVEY Ancestry.com - 1790-1870 Kentucky Census IndexMember Login | Guest Search > Record Type > 1790-1870 Kentucky Census Index > Search ResultsFebruary 10, 2000 Search Terms: COVEY (16), NIXON (97) Database: 1790-1870 Kentucky Census Index Combined Matches: 4 YearSurnameGiven Name (s)CountyStatePageTownship or Other InfoRecord TypeDatabaseID# 1850 COVEY NIXON Breathitt County KY 022District 1 F ederal Population ScheduleKY 1850 Federal Census IndexKYS5a383650 1830 COVEY NIXON Montgomery County KY005 Jeffersonville Federal Population ScheduleKY 1830 Federal Census IndexKY558418190 1830 COVEY NIXON Montgomery County KY 005 Jeffersonville Federal Population ScheduleKY 1830 Federal Census IndexKYS2b37212 1840 COVEY NIXON Morgan County KY 311 No Township Listed Federal Population ScheduleKY 1840 Federal Census IndexKYS4a600594 Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us Wonder why we differ? ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Ancestry.com - Colonial Families in the United StatesMember Login | Guest Registry | Why Join? Advanced Search | Search by Locality | Search by Record Type | Search Help Search > Record Type > Colonial Families in the United States > Search ResultsFebruary 10, 2000 3. Thomas, b. 16th Jan. 1611-12; d. 12th Nov. 1671, third Lord FAIRFAX. He was a participator in the victory obtained by his father at Selby, and commanded the right wing of the parliamentarians at Marston Moor. In the 34th year of his age he was appointed General-in-Chief of the Parliament's armies, and soon after routed the King at Naseby; retook Leicester; beat Col. GORING; took Bridgewater, Dartmouth and Bristol; defeated Lord HOPTON; forced the Prince of Wales into France; and then, reducing the entire West, drove the King from Oxford, in May, 1646, in which year he was made Governor of the Tower of London. After succeeding to the barony, he reduced Colchester; but he took no part in the subsequent proceedings of the Independents, and was entirely free of any participation in the death of the King. In 1650, he resigned the command of the army to CROMWELL; and nine years afterwards, his lordship, coalescing with Sir George DOWNING and General MONK, assisted zealously in restoring the monarchy and was one of the commissioners deputed, upon that occasion, to the King. Soon after this event, Lord FAIRFAX represented the Co. of York in Parliament, but passed the latter end of his life in rural retirement. His lordship m. 20th June, 1637, Anne VERE, dau. and co-heir of Lord VERE of Tilbury, by whom he had one dau., Mary, b. 30th July, 1638; m. 15th Sept. 1657, George VILLIERS, second Duke of Buckingham, son of the favorite of James I. 4. Frances, b. in 1612; d. 1649; m. Sir Thomas WIDDRINGTON of York, Speaker in CROMWELL'S Parliament. 5. Charles, b. 1614; a Colonel in the Parliamentary Army, mortally wounded at the Battle of Marston Moor, in 1644, and d. s. p. a few days afterward. 6. Elizabeth, b. in 1614; m. Sir William CRAVEN of Lenchwicke, who d. 12th Oct. 1655, having had 11. William CRAVEN, b. 1649; d. 3d Aug. 1665. [p.273] 7. Mary, b. in 1616; m. Henry ARTHINGTON. 8. Dorothy, b. in 1617; m. Richard HUTTON of Poppleton. 9. John, b. and d. 1619. 1. Ursula, b. 1647; d. 1702; m. John CARTWRIGHT of Aynho, who d. 1674. 11. Thomas CARTWRIGHT. Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us Ancestry.com - Colonial Families in the United StatesMember Login | Guest Registry | Why Join? Advanced Search | Search by Locality | Search by Record Type | Search Help Search > Record Type > Colonial Families in the United States > Search ResultsFebruary 10, 2000 1. Thomas, sixth Lord FAIRFAX, b. at Denton, 1690; d. s. p. at Greenway Court, Va., 9th Dec. 1781. This nobleman inherited from his mother a considerable fortune, consisting of several manors in Kent, estates in the Isle of Wight, and a tract of land in Virginia, called the Northern Neck, comprised within the boundaries of the rivers Potomac and Rappahannock, containing by estimation, 5,700,000 acres. From his father he inherited Denton Hall and other property in Yorkshire, but he was obliged by his mother and grandmother to dispose of those in order to redeem the COLEPEPPER manors. His lordship had a commission in the Horse Guards, but visiting his American estates in 1736, was so captivated with the soil, climate and beauties of Virginia, that after spending a year with Col. Wm. FAIRFAX at Belvoir, he sailed home, settled his affairs, and, in 1739, returned to Virginia, resolved to spend the remainder of his life there; and he soon after erected Greenway Court, in Frederick Co., where he continued ever afterwards to reside in a state of baronial hospitality. His dress was plain and simple, his manners modest and unaffected, and his style of living, magnificent. Such was his generosity, that he gave up his English estates to his brother Robert, and the surplus of his American income [p.275] was distributed among his poor neighbors. His principal amusement was hunting, and after the chase he was wont to invite the whole field to partake of his hospitality. He had been educated in revolutionary principles, and had imbibed high notions of republican liberty. He was Lieutenant and “custos rotulorum” of Frederick Co., and presided at the Provincial Courts of Winchester, Va., where, during the session, he kept an open table. 2. Henry Colepepper, b. 1693; d. unm. 14th Oct. 1734. 3. Katharine, b. 1695; d. unm. 1716. 4. Margaret, b. 1698; d. s. p. 1755; m. Rev. David WILKINS, D. D. 5. Frances, b. 1703; d. 13th Dec. 1791; m. 1721, Denny MARTIN. 11. Edward MARTIN, b. 1722; d. unm. 1775. 21. John MARTIN, b. 1724; d. unm. 1746. 31. Denny MARTIN, a clergyman, b. 1726; d. unm. Apr. 1800; assumed the name of FAIRFAX. Lands at Moorefield,WV into hands of lawyer-Judge John Marshall 41. Frances, b. 1727; d. 1813. 51. Sibylla, b. 1729; d. 1816. Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us Ancestry.com - Colonial Families in the United StatesMember Login | Guest Registry | Why Join? 7. Robert, b. 1707; d. s. p. 15th July, 1793. Succeeded as seventh Lord FAIRFAX. Was a major in the Life Guards; a member of Parliament for Kent in 1739, 1754 and 1761; m. (firstly) 25th Apr. 1741, Martha COLLINS, d. in 1744, dau. an co-heir of Anthony COLLINS of Baddow, Essex; m. (secondly) in July, 1749, Dorothy Sarah BEST, who d. s. p. 1750, dau. of Maudesley BEST of Boxley, Kent, and sister of Thomas BEST of Chatham. Lord FAIRFAX left his English estates by will, to his nephew, the Rev. Denny MARTIN, who assumed the name of “FAIRFAX.” 11. A son, b. 27th Dec. 1743; d. in 1747. IV. HENRY, b. 20th Apr. 1659, of Toulston, Yorkshire. V. Ursula, b. 3d May, 1661; d. 1668. [p.276] VI. Frances, b. 2d Apr. 1663; d. 22d Jan. 1723; m. 1686, Rev. Nicholas RYMER, Rector of Newton Kyme. VII. Bryan, b. 2d Apr. 1665; d. 7th Oct. 1666. VIII. Barwicke, b. 18th Sept. 1667; d. s. p. 1734, at Tadcaster; Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, 1690; M. A., 1694. IX. Anne, b. 27th Apr. 1670; d. 3d July, 1699; m. 2d Sept. 1690, Ralph CARR, son of Sir Ralph CARR of Cocken, Co. Durham. X. Mary, bap. 8th Oct. 1673; d. unm. 24th Sept. 1716. HENRY FAIRFAX, second son of the fourth Baron FAIRFAX, b. 20th Apr. 1659; d. in 1708; inherited his mother's estate of Toulston. Was Sheriff of Yorkshire, 1691. m. 27th Sept. 1684, Anne HARRISON, dau. and co-heir of Richard HARRISON, of South Cave, Co. York. She d. Aug. 1733. V Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us Ancestry.com - American Biographical NotesMember Login | Guest Registry | Why Join? Search > Record Type > American Biographical Notes > Search ResultsFebruary 10, 2000 Search Terms: FAIRFAX (9), LORD (20) Database: American Biographical Notes F page 134 FAIRFAX, GEORGE WILLIAM, great grandson of Thomas, 4th lord Fairfax and son of Hon. Col. Wm. F., who was lt. of the co. of Fairfax, collector of customs of S. Potomac, and pres. of the Va. council; he was educated in Va., was an early companion of Washington, and an associate land surveyor; he m. dau. of Col. Carey of Hampton, was a member of council and lived at Belvoir; he went to England in 1773, and remained; he settled at Bath, and d. in 1787, a. 63; a part of his estate in Va., was confiscated. (Sabine's Loyalists.) V Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us Ancestry.com - Colonial Families, Southern StatesMember Login | Guest Registry | Why Join? Advanced Search | Search by Locality | Search by Record Type | Search Help Search > Record Type > Colonial Families, Southern States > Search ResultsFebruary 10, 2000 Search Terms: LORD (48), FAIRFAX (45) Database: Colonial Families, Southern States COLONIAL FAMILIES OF THE Southern States of America CARY FAMILY page 130 6--4. Elizabeth b. 1737; m. Brian Fairfax, eighth Lord Fairfax. 6--5. Mary, b. 1738; m. 1754, Edward Ambler, of Jamestown, Va., son of Richard and Elizabeth (Jacquelin) Ambler, and had issue. (See Ambler lineage.) View full context COLONIAL FAMILIES OF THE Southern States of America CARY FAMILY page 131 9--2. Archibald, of Cumberland Co., Va., b. 1808; m. Monimier Fairfax, dau. of Thomas Fairfax, ninth Lord Fairfax. Archibald Cary wrote critically of British asst Indian agent,Nathanial Gist,of Christopher, [who m Cary- mid 1776 Col Gist switched sides in war,Oct 1776. Washington made him a Col NOV 1776.] View full context COLONIAL FAMILIES OF THE Southern States of America MARSHALL FAMILY page 344 COL. THOMAS MARSHALL, (6--4), of "Oak Hill," Fauquier Co., Va., and later of Woodford Co., Ky., the eldest son of Capt. John and Elizabeth (Markham) Marshall; b. April 2, 1730, in Westmoreland Co., Va.; d. June 22, 1802, in Woodford Co., Ky. He was a surveyor, and often attended Washington on his expeditions for Lord Fairfax. He served in the French and Indian War; was a Lieut. of Volunteers. During Braddock's Defeat he was engaged in building Fort Necessity; at the beginning of the Revolution, he was Major of the "Culpeper Minute Men" and was later Col. of the 3d Va. Reg. in the Revolution; this Reg. saved the Continental Army from destruction at the Battle of Brandywine; for his gallant service in this engagement, the House of Burgesses voted him a sword. He was frequently a member of the Burgess, and was of the Convention of 1776, which met at Williamsburg, and declared Virginia independent of the British Empire. In 1785 he removed to Kentucky, and represented Fayette Co., in the Virginia Legislature, 1787. He m. 1754, Mary Randolph Keith, b. April 28, 1737, in Fauquier Co., Va.; d. Sept. 19, 1809, in Mason Co., Ky.; dau. of Rev. James and Mary Isham (Randolph) Keith, of Fauquier Co., Va.(See Keithand Randolph lineage.) Issue: View full context COLONIAL FAMILIES OF THE Southern States of America MASON FAMILY page 380 6--3. Edgar Eilbeck, m. Eugenia Fairfax, dau. of Thomas Fairfax (Lord Fairfax); his wid. married (second) Rev. Mr. Hyde. Issue: View full context Copyright 1998-2000, MyFamily.com Inc. and its subsidiaries. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Y2K| Contact Us ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Please you do NOT have to respond.. thanks, Jeannie <><

Do you have a family history center close to you?... they would have that information in their catalogue file.... Or you can access it on the internet and check it out. Jeannie<>< -----Original Message----- From: AUGCOOK@aol.com [mailto:AUGCOOK@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 1:45 PM To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [KYNICHOL] Chat - Citizen Naturalization Process Dear List: This my first attempt searching for a citizen's naturalization papers. Generally, how was the process during 1870 - 1900 in Montgomery, Nicholas and Clark counties? Where did you find the Declaration of Intent and the Petition for Naturalization? I understand they are filed at two stages in the process. Were they held at each County Seat during this period? My Thomas Blake entered the US in 1865 according to the 1900 Census and was a naturalized citizen. Since a five (5) year waiting period is required, Thomas Blake was living in Carlisle according to the 1870 Census and could have made a petition for naturalization. Afterwards, he moved with the family to Winchester, Clark County and remained their until his death in February 1905. I would appreciate your help so I can petition the correct court(s). Of course, your advice is valued. Thanks in advance. Ed. C.

Thanks for the information. I will check it out. Ed. C.

Nixon's What has X President, Richard Nixon got in common with Nixon Covey ?????. Thanks dear, we as fam. have the inf. you sent, except, the one Nicholite Quaker Covey, Our 2nd. great grandfather, Nixon Covey, became a minister of Baptist faith in Breathitt Co.,Ky., he also taught school there, Dickies Diary----> says a Combs man said, I went to school to him, Now them being Quakers is a mystery to us...... I have called Harve-De-Grace, MD. and all the records were burned twice during wars there, so we have word by mouth, handed down as to where he was born, and cences says that also. Thanks Jan. HERMON B FAGLEY wrote: > > 1830 and 1840 census of Ky have Nixon Covey at Jeffersonville,Montgomery > Co,KY > 1850 HE WAS Morgan Co,Ky > 1860 Breathitt Co,Ky. > I see hints that the Covey's were once in Talbot Co,mid Eastern shore of > Md a few > miles [40?] of Harve de Grace,Md . There is one Nicholite Quaker > Covey MARRIAGE. > As we know from our President,some of the Nixon's were Quaker. > Mitchner's former best selling book, 'Chesapeake" paints word pictures of > life > on the Eastern shore of Md-even Quaker live. A cheap source to learn a > bit on life-styles on Cesapeake Bay. > www.google.com search for COVEY genealogy of the > hits,click > Covey Genealogy Forum. > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:57:05 -0700 "Jean Dalrymple" <motherd@theriver.com> > writes: > > Lovely Cemetery (also previously known as Old Salem Cemetery) At Old > > Salem > > in Jeffersonville State Highway 460 Montgomery County, Kentucky > > Note: > > Burials are being accepted. There are several unidentified graves. > > If you > > have additional information please contact Opal Barrett, 5880 Howe > > Road, > > Trenton, OH 45067 or e-mail B J Hicks at lthicks1@bellsouth.net > > > > Bertha Covey 07-15-1897 11-06-1937 > > Buford Covey 08-16-1901 06-07-1976 > > James E. Covey 02-03-1879 05-03-1953 > > Nannie Covey 11-04-1863 12-03-1936 > > Nixon Covey 02-22-1860 02-11-1931 > > Rachel M. Covey 09-04-1878 04-30-1958 > > Roger B. Covey 00-00-1901 06-07-1976 > > Roger K. Covey 07-01-1930 09-24-1934 > > Russel Covey 03-10-1894 03-22-1933 > > Sidney Covey 11-24-1881 06-20-1943 > > Soney N. Covey 09-17-1908 02-08-1985 > > Vie Covey 04-26-1909 07-15-1986 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Thank you very very much, we have this inf. They are from my he old man Nixon, he is bur. in White Oak, Irvine,Ky. and his wife beside him. she became poor,after his death, and the state pd. for her bural dress, which then it only cost $5.00. The Nixon,{ which we call Nixon, Jr. M: Nannie Conkwright}, he is the grandson of Nixon Covey and Susan Willoughby Covey, and the son of William L.L.Covey, M: Pheby Willoughby d/o William Willoughby, rel to Susan, I cant say; because I haven't donr any research on the Willoughby's yet,, Thanks again,Jan. Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > Lovely Cemetery (also previously known as Old Salem Cemetery) At Old Salem > in Jeffersonville State Highway 460 Montgomery County, Kentucky Note: > Burials are being accepted. There are several unidentified graves. If you > have additional information please contact Opal Barrett, 5880 Howe Road, > Trenton, OH 45067 or e-mail B J Hicks at lthicks1@bellsouth.net > > Bertha Covey 07-15-1897 11-06-1937 > Buford Covey 08-16-1901 06-07-1976 > James E. Covey 02-03-1879 05-03-1953 > Nannie Covey 11-04-1863 12-03-1936 > Nixon Covey 02-22-1860 02-11-1931 > Rachel M. Covey 09-04-1878 04-30-1958 > Roger B. Covey 00-00-1901 06-07-1976 > Roger K. Covey 07-01-1930 09-24-1934 > Russel Covey 03-10-1894 03-22-1933 > Sidney Covey 11-24-1881 06-20-1943 > Soney N. Covey 09-17-1908 02-08-1985 > Vie Covey 04-26-1909 07-15-1986

Dear List: This my first attempt searching for a citizen's naturalization papers. Generally, how was the process during 1870 - 1900 in Montgomery, Nicholas and Clark counties? Where did you find the Declaration of Intent and the Petition for Naturalization? I understand they are filed at two stages in the process. Were they held at each County Seat during this period? My Thomas Blake entered the US in 1865 according to the 1900 Census and was a naturalized citizen. Since a five (5) year waiting period is required, Thomas Blake was living in Carlisle according to the 1870 Census and could have made a petition for naturalization. Afterwards, he moved with the family to Winchester, Clark County and remained their until his death in February 1905. I would appreciate your help so I can petition the correct court(s). Of course, your advice is valued. Thanks in advance. Ed. C.

1830 and 1840 census of Ky have Nixon Covey at Jeffersonville,Montgomery Co,KY 1850 HE WAS Morgan Co,Ky 1860 Breathitt Co,Ky. I see hints that the Covey's were once in Talbot Co,mid Eastern shore of Md a few miles [40?] of Harve de Grace,Md . There is one Nicholite Quaker Covey MARRIAGE. As we know from our President,some of the Nixon's were Quaker. Mitchner's former best selling book, 'Chesapeake" paints word pictures of life on the Eastern shore of Md-even Quaker live. A cheap source to learn a bit on life-styles on Cesapeake Bay. www.google.com search for COVEY genealogy of the hits,click Covey Genealogy Forum. On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:57:05 -0700 "Jean Dalrymple" <motherd@theriver.com> writes: > Lovely Cemetery (also previously known as Old Salem Cemetery) At Old > Salem > in Jeffersonville State Highway 460 Montgomery County, Kentucky > Note: > Burials are being accepted. There are several unidentified graves. > If you > have additional information please contact Opal Barrett, 5880 Howe > Road, > Trenton, OH 45067 or e-mail B J Hicks at lthicks1@bellsouth.net > > Bertha Covey 07-15-1897 11-06-1937 > Buford Covey 08-16-1901 06-07-1976 > James E. Covey 02-03-1879 05-03-1953 > Nannie Covey 11-04-1863 12-03-1936 > Nixon Covey 02-22-1860 02-11-1931 > Rachel M. Covey 09-04-1878 04-30-1958 > Roger B. Covey 00-00-1901 06-07-1976 > Roger K. Covey 07-01-1930 09-24-1934 > Russel Covey 03-10-1894 03-22-1933 > Sidney Covey 11-24-1881 06-20-1943 > Soney N. Covey 09-17-1908 02-08-1985 > Vie Covey 04-26-1909 07-15-1986 > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Lovely Cemetery (also previously known as Old Salem Cemetery) At Old Salem in Jeffersonville State Highway 460 Montgomery County, Kentucky Note: Burials are being accepted. There are several unidentified graves. If you have additional information please contact Opal Barrett, 5880 Howe Road, Trenton, OH 45067 or e-mail B J Hicks at lthicks1@bellsouth.net Bertha Covey 07-15-1897 11-06-1937 Buford Covey 08-16-1901 06-07-1976 James E. Covey 02-03-1879 05-03-1953 Nannie Covey 11-04-1863 12-03-1936 Nixon Covey 02-22-1860 02-11-1931 Rachel M. Covey 09-04-1878 04-30-1958 Roger B. Covey 00-00-1901 06-07-1976 Roger K. Covey 07-01-1930 09-24-1934 Russel Covey 03-10-1894 03-22-1933 Sidney Covey 11-24-1881 06-20-1943 Soney N. Covey 09-17-1908 02-08-1985 Vie Covey 04-26-1909 07-15-1986

Jean, sorry I did not mention abt. me calling Urah Temple Library, thats when they told me I could come there and read the film or that I would have to get a church member to read it or someone at the genealogy place that was a member, When the Genealogy person their called me and told me my film was in that I couldn't read, I asked if someone there could, I was told no, that I would have to contact Utah and go from their.so I did call and they rec. a person there, so I pd. her. Jan. Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > Dear Jan, I am SURE that you have misunderstood the LDS librarian as you > have sure misunderstood what I have written on this subject... > > There is no need in my going over this again with you, please reread > CAREFULLY the previous e-mails..... > > The Penn information that you ordered may have been a private record that > the submitter was donating to the church, but did not want distributed. > These are usually open for public reading at the large and main library in > Salt Lake City, called the Temple Library," hence the phone # for you to > call. > > The only records that only an LDS member can read are their Temple connected > records.... Sorry to have to disagree with you on so much.... But I DO > know what I am talking about, I am no longer a member of that church but > was for 30 years.... And I still use their facilities with gusto... I also > work in the library. > > As far as I am concerned this subject is CLOSED..... Please! > > Jeannie <>< > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 10:29 AM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > Hello Jean, you brought up the subject abt. the microfilm, you wrote > anything that you give them, becomes their property, unless you have > given them written notice that they are not to give out the inf. out to > anyone....Then they can do what ever they wont to with it. > I use to go to their one genealogy place here in Dayton, Oh. I, one > time I rented three film from them; this was on my forth gr grandfather > Major King,from Amherst,VA., > well I thought I would find out his parents as the film looked > promising, well when the film came in I got a call telling me that I > cannot read the film unless I was a member of the church, or someone who > is a member can read it for me as the person that subbmitted it does not > wont th inf. given out. { A William Penn, not the William Penn}, well no > one at the genealogy area would not read the film, reason they said was > because he, William Penn did no wont the inf. to be given out, well I > was given a name and a phone # in Utah, I called and the woman read it > for a charge, she sent me copies of the film which was type written and > under his name, Major King father is Joseph King; this was hand written > in her hand writing. their was only a few names on it, really nothing > that wasn't already out on the census, and nothing even mentioning any > of his children, not even his wife, which we as a fam. had already, I > cant understand why these things happens, Jan. > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > Dear Jan.. > > > > Sorry to tell you, but the LDS church does NOT microfilm ANYTHING with out > > the WRITTEN permission of who ever is in charge... AND if the diary is in > > the possession of your family then they had to have been CALLED and ASKED > to > > film it.... and there will be a disclaimer at the beginning of the item on > > the film stating who GAVE the permission.. they did not break into your > > families house and make a copy of the diary..... in fact there is usually > a > > copy of the orig. letter of permission. > > > > Now... anything that you give to them or any one else including the stuff > > that you put out on the internet becomes the property of who ever you gave > > it to unless you have given them WRITTEN notice that they are NOT to give > > the information out to any one..... then they can do what ever with > > it....... > > > > I am sorry that the person no longer lives at that addy, perhaps if you > were > > to get on the net and see if he is out there, you may be able to see where > > he got his Information.. other wise check out and see what you can find > in > > Butler Co OH about your family.... > > > > Jeannie <>< > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 11:20 PM > > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > > > Dear Jean, I tried to contact the person with no success after I found > > out who it was after writing a letter and made a phone call, the person > > apparently has his e-mail changed; because his mail came back to me > > twice as I thought I had maybe made a mistake in his address after > > I had written it down exactly has it was given to me. I wrote him a nice > > letter, Someone told me that the Mormon Genealogy Society now has a copy > > of his diary,thats ok, I am just wondering if we had told the people not > > to let it out side the family, I really wonder if they would have done > > it even thow they promised not to, I took a chance when I first made > > copies of it, if it maybe would have done something to the ink as it was > > quiet old, it was copied for me from the book its self, few years back, > > now realizing that, I make copies from the copies that I copied from my > > first copies that was given to me, make sence? > > Thanks, Jan. > > after my color came back, has I did not wont to write in haste. > > > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > > > Good morning Jan.... > > > > > > There are MANY err's in the LDS IGI and the Ancestorial file... > > especially > > > the ancestorial file, the reason there is, is that folks like you and I > > > submit the information to the "Morman's" in the first place.... So who > > > ever submitted that information got their information from some where > > > else... you should contact that submitter... and ask NICELY where they > > > obtained the information... > > > > > > ALSO.. I have found that many folks did NOT know where they were born > way > > > back then..... they did not celebrate birthdays etc and the elders did > not > > > talk much about such things.... So perhaps he THOUGHT that he was born > in > > > one place and he was born in another INROUTE some where, perhaps > Cinci... > > > as his family was moving West down the OH river.... > > > > > > I have a gent that swore that he was born in 1710 in PA.... I believed > > him > > > until just a few months ago I found that he was actually born in > Scotland > > in > > > 1708.... He lived in PA for about 20 years, then moved South into SC. > > > I found him and his siblings and parents on a ships record and then in > to > > > the church records in Scotland and his families church records in PA.... > > > He just lived there and ASSUMED that he was born there...... > > > > > > Now as far as the different dates of birth, that is an easy one.... > Some > > > times we have to use baptism records...... and the date that you have > for > > > birth and the other records could very well be one of each.... As for > > > census. They are also full of holes.... They are just as good as the > > person > > > who answered the door... sometimes that was just a neighbor... > > > > > > Oh, I am not trying to defend the person that submitted the information > to > > > the LDS, I am just saying that there may be a chance that you both for > > very > > > good reasons think that you are correct.. > > > > > > ALSO there are so many folks out there that do NOT bother to prove their > > > information... and perhaps like me... I don't prove the collateral lines > > > that others send me.... it is just to darn expensive.. I do however try > > to > > > say that it is unproven by me..... > > > > > > So before you get to excited, contact that submitter and see where they > > > obtained that information.... Perhaps your g-g-grandfathers mother left > a > > > diary.. > > > > > > Jeannie <>< > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 10:42 PM > > > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > > > > > I clicked on the web page and what I found out to be untrue is the inf. > > > abt. my second great grandfather, Nixon Covey,someone submitted the > > > wrong inf. to the Morman. WE as a family has his diary that he himself > > > left us in his own hand writing,,, I would like for someone write them > > > for a correction on him and his fam. I would like to know where the > > > Morman genealogy society got their inf. > > > 1, he was not born on the 31 of March 1791, he was born on the 1 st. of > > > March 1791, For Sure not in Cinncinnati, Oh., But in Harve-De- Grace, > > > MD., he never lived in Oh. He lived in diff. parts of Ky. and your Ky. > > > cences will tell you that, which I can prove. He taught school in > > > Breathitt Co. Ky, and in Estill Co.,Ky. His records stands strong > > > there. I wish people wouldn't tell things like that, it urps me to > > > know end, > > > I am a proud 2nd. great grandaughter of Nixon Covey's And I wish that > > > someone would rectify this mess, HE NOR DID NONE OF HIS FAMLEY EVER, > > > EVER LIVED IN OHIO { PERIOD}, Jan. > > > > > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > > > > > http://globalgazette.net/gazettes/gaz49.htm > > > > > > > > interesting research information... j. <><

Dear Jan, I am SURE that you have misunderstood the LDS librarian as you have sure misunderstood what I have written on this subject... There is no need in my going over this again with you, please reread CAREFULLY the previous e-mails..... The Penn information that you ordered may have been a private record that the submitter was donating to the church, but did not want distributed. These are usually open for public reading at the large and main library in Salt Lake City, called the Temple Library," hence the phone # for you to call. The only records that only an LDS member can read are their Temple connected records.... Sorry to have to disagree with you on so much.... But I DO know what I am talking about, I am no longer a member of that church but was for 30 years.... And I still use their facilities with gusto... I also work in the library. As far as I am concerned this subject is CLOSED..... Please! Jeannie <>< -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 10:29 AM To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit Hello Jean, you brought up the subject abt. the microfilm, you wrote anything that you give them, becomes their property, unless you have given them written notice that they are not to give out the inf. out to anyone....Then they can do what ever they wont to with it. I use to go to their one genealogy place here in Dayton, Oh. I, one time I rented three film from them; this was on my forth gr grandfather Major King,from Amherst,VA., well I thought I would find out his parents as the film looked promising, well when the film came in I got a call telling me that I cannot read the film unless I was a member of the church, or someone who is a member can read it for me as the person that subbmitted it does not wont th inf. given out. { A William Penn, not the William Penn}, well no one at the genealogy area would not read the film, reason they said was because he, William Penn did no wont the inf. to be given out, well I was given a name and a phone # in Utah, I called and the woman read it for a charge, she sent me copies of the film which was type written and under his name, Major King father is Joseph King; this was hand written in her hand writing. their was only a few names on it, really nothing that wasn't already out on the census, and nothing even mentioning any of his children, not even his wife, which we as a fam. had already, I cant understand why these things happens, Jan. Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > Dear Jan.. > > Sorry to tell you, but the LDS church does NOT microfilm ANYTHING with out > the WRITTEN permission of who ever is in charge... AND if the diary is in > the possession of your family then they had to have been CALLED and ASKED to > film it.... and there will be a disclaimer at the beginning of the item on > the film stating who GAVE the permission.. they did not break into your > families house and make a copy of the diary..... in fact there is usually a > copy of the orig. letter of permission. > > Now... anything that you give to them or any one else including the stuff > that you put out on the internet becomes the property of who ever you gave > it to unless you have given them WRITTEN notice that they are NOT to give > the information out to any one..... then they can do what ever with > it....... > > I am sorry that the person no longer lives at that addy, perhaps if you were > to get on the net and see if he is out there, you may be able to see where > he got his Information.. other wise check out and see what you can find in > Butler Co OH about your family.... > > Jeannie <>< > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 11:20 PM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > Dear Jean, I tried to contact the person with no success after I found > out who it was after writing a letter and made a phone call, the person > apparently has his e-mail changed; because his mail came back to me > twice as I thought I had maybe made a mistake in his address after > I had written it down exactly has it was given to me. I wrote him a nice > letter, Someone told me that the Mormon Genealogy Society now has a copy > of his diary,thats ok, I am just wondering if we had told the people not > to let it out side the family, I really wonder if they would have done > it even thow they promised not to, I took a chance when I first made > copies of it, if it maybe would have done something to the ink as it was > quiet old, it was copied for me from the book its self, few years back, > now realizing that, I make copies from the copies that I copied from my > first copies that was given to me, make sence? > Thanks, Jan. > after my color came back, has I did not wont to write in haste. > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > Good morning Jan.... > > > > There are MANY err's in the LDS IGI and the Ancestorial file... > especially > > the ancestorial file, the reason there is, is that folks like you and I > > submit the information to the "Morman's" in the first place.... So who > > ever submitted that information got their information from some where > > else... you should contact that submitter... and ask NICELY where they > > obtained the information... > > > > ALSO.. I have found that many folks did NOT know where they were born way > > back then..... they did not celebrate birthdays etc and the elders did not > > talk much about such things.... So perhaps he THOUGHT that he was born in > > one place and he was born in another INROUTE some where, perhaps Cinci... > > as his family was moving West down the OH river.... > > > > I have a gent that swore that he was born in 1710 in PA.... I believed > him > > until just a few months ago I found that he was actually born in Scotland > in > > 1708.... He lived in PA for about 20 years, then moved South into SC. > > I found him and his siblings and parents on a ships record and then in to > > the church records in Scotland and his families church records in PA.... > > He just lived there and ASSUMED that he was born there...... > > > > Now as far as the different dates of birth, that is an easy one.... Some > > times we have to use baptism records...... and the date that you have for > > birth and the other records could very well be one of each.... As for > > census. They are also full of holes.... They are just as good as the > person > > who answered the door... sometimes that was just a neighbor... > > > > Oh, I am not trying to defend the person that submitted the information to > > the LDS, I am just saying that there may be a chance that you both for > very > > good reasons think that you are correct.. > > > > ALSO there are so many folks out there that do NOT bother to prove their > > information... and perhaps like me... I don't prove the collateral lines > > that others send me.... it is just to darn expensive.. I do however try > to > > say that it is unproven by me..... > > > > So before you get to excited, contact that submitter and see where they > > obtained that information.... Perhaps your g-g-grandfathers mother left a > > diary.. > > > > Jeannie <>< > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 10:42 PM > > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > > > I clicked on the web page and what I found out to be untrue is the inf. > > abt. my second great grandfather, Nixon Covey,someone submitted the > > wrong inf. to the Morman. WE as a family has his diary that he himself > > left us in his own hand writing,,, I would like for someone write them > > for a correction on him and his fam. I would like to know where the > > Morman genealogy society got their inf. > > 1, he was not born on the 31 of March 1791, he was born on the 1 st. of > > March 1791, For Sure not in Cinncinnati, Oh., But in Harve-De- Grace, > > MD., he never lived in Oh. He lived in diff. parts of Ky. and your Ky. > > cences will tell you that, which I can prove. He taught school in > > Breathitt Co. Ky, and in Estill Co.,Ky. His records stands strong > > there. I wish people wouldn't tell things like that, it urps me to > > know end, > > I am a proud 2nd. great grandaughter of Nixon Covey's And I wish that > > someone would rectify this mess, HE NOR DID NONE OF HIS FAMLEY EVER, > > EVER LIVED IN OHIO { PERIOD}, Jan. > > > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > > > http://globalgazette.net/gazettes/gaz49.htm > > > > > > interesting research information... j. <><

Hello Jean, you brought up the subject abt. the microfilm, you wrote anything that you give them, becomes their property, unless you have given them written notice that they are not to give out the inf. out to anyone....Then they can do what ever they wont to with it. I use to go to their one genealogy place here in Dayton, Oh. I, one time I rented three film from them; this was on my forth gr grandfather Major King,from Amherst,VA., well I thought I would find out his parents as the film looked promising, well when the film came in I got a call telling me that I cannot read the film unless I was a member of the church, or someone who is a member can read it for me as the person that subbmitted it does not wont th inf. given out. { A William Penn, not the William Penn}, well no one at the genealogy area would not read the film, reason they said was because he, William Penn did no wont the inf. to be given out, well I was given a name and a phone # in Utah, I called and the woman read it for a charge, she sent me copies of the film which was type written and under his name, Major King father is Joseph King; this was hand written in her hand writing. their was only a few names on it, really nothing that wasn't already out on the census, and nothing even mentioning any of his children, not even his wife, which we as a fam. had already, I cant understand why these things happens, Jan. Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > Dear Jan.. > > Sorry to tell you, but the LDS church does NOT microfilm ANYTHING with out > the WRITTEN permission of who ever is in charge... AND if the diary is in > the possession of your family then they had to have been CALLED and ASKED to > film it.... and there will be a disclaimer at the beginning of the item on > the film stating who GAVE the permission.. they did not break into your > families house and make a copy of the diary..... in fact there is usually a > copy of the orig. letter of permission. > > Now... anything that you give to them or any one else including the stuff > that you put out on the internet becomes the property of who ever you gave > it to unless you have given them WRITTEN notice that they are NOT to give > the information out to any one..... then they can do what ever with > it....... > > I am sorry that the person no longer lives at that addy, perhaps if you were > to get on the net and see if he is out there, you may be able to see where > he got his Information.. other wise check out and see what you can find in > Butler Co OH about your family.... > > Jeannie <>< > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 11:20 PM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > Dear Jean, I tried to contact the person with no success after I found > out who it was after writing a letter and made a phone call, the person > apparently has his e-mail changed; because his mail came back to me > twice as I thought I had maybe made a mistake in his address after > I had written it down exactly has it was given to me. I wrote him a nice > letter, Someone told me that the Mormon Genealogy Society now has a copy > of his diary,thats ok, I am just wondering if we had told the people not > to let it out side the family, I really wonder if they would have done > it even thow they promised not to, I took a chance when I first made > copies of it, if it maybe would have done something to the ink as it was > quiet old, it was copied for me from the book its self, few years back, > now realizing that, I make copies from the copies that I copied from my > first copies that was given to me, make sence? > Thanks, Jan. > after my color came back, has I did not wont to write in haste. > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > Good morning Jan.... > > > > There are MANY err's in the LDS IGI and the Ancestorial file... > especially > > the ancestorial file, the reason there is, is that folks like you and I > > submit the information to the "Morman's" in the first place.... So who > > ever submitted that information got their information from some where > > else... you should contact that submitter... and ask NICELY where they > > obtained the information... > > > > ALSO.. I have found that many folks did NOT know where they were born way > > back then..... they did not celebrate birthdays etc and the elders did not > > talk much about such things.... So perhaps he THOUGHT that he was born in > > one place and he was born in another INROUTE some where, perhaps Cinci... > > as his family was moving West down the OH river.... > > > > I have a gent that swore that he was born in 1710 in PA.... I believed > him > > until just a few months ago I found that he was actually born in Scotland > in > > 1708.... He lived in PA for about 20 years, then moved South into SC. > > I found him and his siblings and parents on a ships record and then in to > > the church records in Scotland and his families church records in PA.... > > He just lived there and ASSUMED that he was born there...... > > > > Now as far as the different dates of birth, that is an easy one.... Some > > times we have to use baptism records...... and the date that you have for > > birth and the other records could very well be one of each.... As for > > census. They are also full of holes.... They are just as good as the > person > > who answered the door... sometimes that was just a neighbor... > > > > Oh, I am not trying to defend the person that submitted the information to > > the LDS, I am just saying that there may be a chance that you both for > very > > good reasons think that you are correct.. > > > > ALSO there are so many folks out there that do NOT bother to prove their > > information... and perhaps like me... I don't prove the collateral lines > > that others send me.... it is just to darn expensive.. I do however try > to > > say that it is unproven by me..... > > > > So before you get to excited, contact that submitter and see where they > > obtained that information.... Perhaps your g-g-grandfathers mother left a > > diary.. > > > > Jeannie <>< > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 10:42 PM > > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > > > I clicked on the web page and what I found out to be untrue is the inf. > > abt. my second great grandfather, Nixon Covey,someone submitted the > > wrong inf. to the Morman. WE as a family has his diary that he himself > > left us in his own hand writing,,, I would like for someone write them > > for a correction on him and his fam. I would like to know where the > > Morman genealogy society got their inf. > > 1, he was not born on the 31 of March 1791, he was born on the 1 st. of > > March 1791, For Sure not in Cinncinnati, Oh., But in Harve-De- Grace, > > MD., he never lived in Oh. He lived in diff. parts of Ky. and your Ky. > > cences will tell you that, which I can prove. He taught school in > > Breathitt Co. Ky, and in Estill Co.,Ky. His records stands strong > > there. I wish people wouldn't tell things like that, it urps me to > > know end, > > I am a proud 2nd. great grandaughter of Nixon Covey's And I wish that > > someone would rectify this mess, HE NOR DID NONE OF HIS FAMLEY EVER, > > EVER LIVED IN OHIO { PERIOD}, Jan. > > > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > > > http://globalgazette.net/gazettes/gaz49.htm > > > > > > interesting research information... j. <><

I'm glad we are still on the subject of Samuel Shannon. Looked at something I wrote yesterday & saw a misspeak; my Robert Shannon may be a brother of your Samuel, but certainly not his son...Samuel is only 11 years older than Robt. Roy Shannon wrote the Shannon history section of Nicholas County History, and only his branch shows up there. Considering the organizations to which Roy belonged, his family documentation must be impeccable. They should, however, show up in 1830-40-50 Nicholas Co census, but I don't see them. Although they lived in the same area as my Shannons, between the Licking River & Cassidy Creek in the Upper Blue Licks/Buzzard Roost precincts, I find no family connection. Oh well, more research.... The marraige/bond date I have for Margaret & Jesse Hardwick is 13 Nov 1839. The Elizabeth Shannon who married Robert Hardwick (bro of Jesse??) & Margaret would fit into Samuel's 1820 & 1830 census listings. At 03:54 PM 2/7/00 -0700, you wrote: >Then there is much else I can do as you already have my resource book :) > >There are a LOT of wee cemeteries in Nicholas co.... so don't give up hope, >you need to go and just start with a map that shows where they all are and >start looking..... but don't go in the heat of summer, the humidity will >kill you..... > >Jeannie <>< >-----Original Message----- >From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] >Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 3:13 PM >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > >I own the History of Nicholas County; I haven't been to the cemetery >but have whatever is in print about it and also the Concord cemetery. >Whenever I have been to Nicholas and Bourbon, I've never had any luck >locating the older generations, so always assumed they were buried on >their own land. I think I've pretty much exhaused the records in print, >but I'm not sure. I live in Dallas and we have a pretty good >genealogical collection in our library, but sometimes there are other, >more obscure records in the original county. Mary > >> >> Dear Jeannie and Chuck: I have been down on Cassidy Creek--at the time >> looking for Hardwicks. What a desolate spot that is! I even stopped >> and looked at a decrepid burying ground by a closed church building and >> there was a Shannon in there but more recent than my Margaret who died >> in 1943. Any help would be appreciated. I've been to Carlisle about >> four times to research, but I keep coming up with new names to look >> for. A lovely little town, but I'll probably not get back again. >> Thanks, Mary Miller >> >> "charles r. carter" wrote: >> > >> > I doubt it, Jeannie... the older Shannons are scattered all over >Nicholas >> & >> > surrounding county homesteads & graveyards from Mt Tabor to Cassidy >Creek >> & >> > beyond. >> > >> > Chuck >> > >> > At 02:44 PM 2/6/00 -0700, you wrote: >> > >Chuck, do you think I should add the Shannons in the Carlisle cem to >the >> > >list of stuff... would that benefit her? Jeannie <>< >> > > >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > >From: charles r. carter [mailto:cartercr@rma.edu] >> > >Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:45 PM >> > >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com >> > >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's >> > > >> > >The Robert Shannon-Francis Berry combo below is in my Shannon baliwick. >> > >Robert has a grandson named Samuel, but I have no proof of a tie to >your >> > >Samuel. >> > > >> > >Chuck Carter >> > > >> > > >> > >At 02:12 PM 2/6/00 -0600, you wrote: >> > >>Thank you, thank you. Mary >> > >> >> > >>Jean Dalrymple wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Marriages SHANNON >> > >>> >> > >>> Ann to Jonas SEARS 8 Sept 1825 >> > >>> Elizabeth to Robert HARDWICK 9 Sep 1840 >> > >>> John to Betsy PEYTON 14 Aug 1812 >> > >>> Jeremiah to Jane McCLANAHAN 9 Apr 1819 >> > >>> John to Kiziah ROGERS 0 Aug 1820 >> > >>> John to Lausha (?) MORGON 20 Jul 1819 >> > >>> Joseph to Jane GRAYHAM 1 Feb 1820 >> > >>> Margaret to Jesse HARDWICK 13 Nov 1834 >> > >>> Mary to Nathaniel SCOTT 2 Mar 1813 >> > >>> Miss to W; SHARP 8 Mar 1840 >> > >>> Robert to Frances PERRY/BERRY 12 Jan 1827 >> > >>> Samuel to Sally GRAYSON 23 Sep 1812 >> > >>> Thomas to Pollyann QUIETT 7 Nov 1838 >> > >>> ------------ >> > >>> >> > >>> 1810 census >> > >>> >> > >>> Shanan, Margaret 122-- -11-1 - - >> > >>> Shanon, John 12-1- 1-1-- - - >> > >>> ------------ >> > >>> 1820 census >> > >>> >> > >>> Shannon, John 1---1- ---1- - - >> > >>> Shannon, John Jr. ---1-- 11-- - - >> > >>> Shannon John Sr. 3----1 1--1- - - >> > >>> Shannon, Samuel 2---1- 2--1- - - >> > >>> ------------- >> > >>> 1830 census >> > >>> >> > >>> Shannon, Jeremiah 21---1------- -1--1-------- - - >> > >>> Shannon, Robert 1---1-------- ----1-------- 1 - >> > >>> Shannon, Samuel 11-1--1------ 111--1------- - - >> > >>> ----------------- >> > >>> 1840 census >> > >>> >> > >>> Shannon, Jane* -11----------- -----1------- 2 - >> > >>> Shannon, Robert 111--1------- 11--1-------- 1 - >> > >>> Shannon, Samuel -11---1------ 11-1--1------ - - >> > >>> Shannon, Thomas 1---1-------- ----1--------- - - >> > >>> ------------- >> > >>> 1850 census they can be found on the following pages.... >> > >>> >> > >>> 391, 449, 454, 467 >> > >>> ---------

We have been there and done that, we know all that, I am not blaming no one, we just wonted to find out who this one Jerry____ is and where he got his inf. from, I did write to him but he hasn't come out of the wood work, and our diary, we know who we sent a copt to,it was mailed to them, and it has not been put on the internet, not by one who we sent a copy to, we know the Mormans would not put anything out that you told them not to anfd we didn't say they did,, and I aks fro this to be dropped. ALL I WONTED TO KNOW IS WHERE HE GOT HIS INF. abt. his fam. was born in Cin.,Oh. Jan. Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > Dear Jan.. > > Sorry to tell you, but the LDS church does NOT microfilm ANYTHING with out > the WRITTEN permission of who ever is in charge... AND if the diary is in > the possession of your family then they had to have been CALLED and ASKED to > film it.... and there will be a disclaimer at the beginning of the item on > the film stating who GAVE the permission.. they did not break into your > families house and make a copy of the diary..... in fact there is usually a > copy of the orig. letter of permission. > > Now... anything that you give to them or any one else including the stuff > that you put out on the internet becomes the property of who ever you gave > it to unless you have given them WRITTEN notice that they are NOT to give > the information out to any one..... then they can do what ever with > it....... > > I am sorry that the person no longer lives at that addy, perhaps if you were > to get on the net and see if he is out there, you may be able to see where > he got his Information.. other wise check out and see what you can find in > Butler Co OH about your family.... > > Jeannie <>< > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 11:20 PM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > Dear Jean, I tried to contact the person with no success after I found > out who it was after writing a letter and made a phone call, the person > apparently has his e-mail changed; because his mail came back to me > twice as I thought I had maybe made a mistake in his address after > I had written it down exactly has it was given to me. I wrote him a nice > letter, Someone told me that the Mormon Genealogy Society now has a copy > of his diary,thats ok, I am just wondering if we had told the people not > to let it out side the family, I really wonder if they would have done > it even thow they promised not to, I took a chance when I first made > copies of it, if it maybe would have done something to the ink as it was > quiet old, it was copied for me from the book its self, few years back, > now realizing that, I make copies from the copies that I copied from my > first copies that was given to me, make sence? > Thanks, Jan. > after my color came back, has I did not wont to write in haste. > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > Good morning Jan.... > > > > There are MANY err's in the LDS IGI and the Ancestorial file... > especially > > the ancestorial file, the reason there is, is that folks like you and I > > submit the information to the "Morman's" in the first place.... So who > > ever submitted that information got their information from some where > > else... you should contact that submitter... and ask NICELY where they > > obtained the information... > > > > ALSO.. I have found that many folks did NOT know where they were born way > > back then..... they did not celebrate birthdays etc and the elders did not > > talk much about such things.... So perhaps he THOUGHT that he was born in > > one place and he was born in another INROUTE some where, perhaps Cinci... > > as his family was moving West down the OH river.... > > > > I have a gent that swore that he was born in 1710 in PA.... I believed > him > > until just a few months ago I found that he was actually born in Scotland > in > > 1708.... He lived in PA for about 20 years, then moved South into SC. > > I found him and his siblings and parents on a ships record and then in to > > the church records in Scotland and his families church records in PA.... > > He just lived there and ASSUMED that he was born there...... > > > > Now as far as the different dates of birth, that is an easy one.... Some > > times we have to use baptism records...... and the date that you have for > > birth and the other records could very well be one of each.... As for > > census. They are also full of holes.... They are just as good as the > person > > who answered the door... sometimes that was just a neighbor... > > > > Oh, I am not trying to defend the person that submitted the information to > > the LDS, I am just saying that there may be a chance that you both for > very > > good reasons think that you are correct.. > > > > ALSO there are so many folks out there that do NOT bother to prove their > > information... and perhaps like me... I don't prove the collateral lines > > that others send me.... it is just to darn expensive.. I do however try > to > > say that it is unproven by me..... > > > > So before you get to excited, contact that submitter and see where they > > obtained that information.... Perhaps your g-g-grandfathers mother left a > > diary.. > > > > Jeannie <>< > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Sexton [mailto:SugarSpoon@worldnet.att.net] > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 10:42 PM > > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] tid-bit > > > > I clicked on the web page and what I found out to be untrue is the inf. > > abt. my second great grandfather, Nixon Covey,someone submitted the > > wrong inf. to the Morman. WE as a family has his diary that he himself > > left us in his own hand writing,,, I would like for someone write them > > for a correction on him and his fam. I would like to know where the > > Morman genealogy society got their inf. > > 1, he was not born on the 31 of March 1791, he was born on the 1 st. of > > March 1791, For Sure not in Cinncinnati, Oh., But in Harve-De- Grace, > > MD., he never lived in Oh. He lived in diff. parts of Ky. and your Ky. > > cences will tell you that, which I can prove. He taught school in > > Breathitt Co. Ky, and in Estill Co.,Ky. His records stands strong > > there. I wish people wouldn't tell things like that, it urps me to > > know end, > > I am a proud 2nd. great grandaughter of Nixon Covey's And I wish that > > someone would rectify this mess, HE NOR DID NONE OF HIS FAMLEY EVER, > > EVER LIVED IN OHIO { PERIOD}, Jan. > > > > Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > > > > > http://globalgazette.net/gazettes/gaz49.htm > > > > > > interesting research information... j. <><

Dear Chuck - Thanks for the input re Burnaugh/Burnaw - I notice that your line connects to a Bronnaugh - were they in Nicholasville? I've asked Genealogists thru the years and some of them think these all may have been the same family way back - would like to hear what you think Thanks Virginia Burnau Callaway -----Original Message----- From: charles r. carter <cartercr@rma.edu> To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com <KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Monday, November 29, 1999 10:33 AM Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Roll call - Burnaugh/McCausland/Gorham >Virginia, > >There are still BURNAWs in Nicholas Co. Fred, a schoolmate of mine in the >50s lives in Carlisle. He is the son of J. Berry Burnaw, the Nicholas >county clerk for many years. > >My Nicholas Co. RANKIN/ARMSTRONG ancestors were connected to Forrest Frank >BRONAUGH of Lexington, KY by marraige. > >I realize this info is off the wall, but hope it will be of some assistance. > >Chuck Carter > > >At 06:28 PM 11/28/99 -0600, you wrote: >>Hello List - >>Hope someone has one of the above surnames they are researching - The >>Burnaugh's >>were in Nicholas and Bourbon Counties as early as l794. >>Thanks and Happy Holidays. >> >>Virginia Callaway Burnau > > > >==== KYNICHOL Mailing List ==== >To UNSUBSCRIBE send a new e-mail to KYNICHOL-L-request@rootsweb.com or KYNICHOL-D-request@rootsweb.com with nothing in the body of the e-mail except the word unsubscribe. > >

Then there is much else I can do as you already have my resource book :) There are a LOT of wee cemeteries in Nicholas co.... so don't give up hope, you need to go and just start with a map that shows where they all are and start looking..... but don't go in the heat of summer, the humidity will kill you..... Jeannie <>< -----Original Message----- From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 3:13 PM To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's I own the History of Nicholas County; I haven't been to the cemetery but have whatever is in print about it and also the Concord cemetery. Whenever I have been to Nicholas and Bourbon, I've never had any luck locating the older generations, so always assumed they were buried on their own land. I think I've pretty much exhaused the records in print, but I'm not sure. I live in Dallas and we have a pretty good genealogical collection in our library, but sometimes there are other, more obscure records in the original county. Mary Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > OK.... Before I start a lot of typing..... do you have or have you > extracted the information out of the History of Nicholas co.? and have you > been to the Carlisle Cemetery > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:32 PM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > Dear Jeannie and Chuck: I have been down on Cassidy Creek--at the time > looking for Hardwicks. What a desolate spot that is! I even stopped > and looked at a decrepid burying ground by a closed church building and > there was a Shannon in there but more recent than my Margaret who died > in 1943. Any help would be appreciated. I've been to Carlisle about > four times to research, but I keep coming up with new names to look > for. A lovely little town, but I'll probably not get back again. > Thanks, Mary Miller > > "charles r. carter" wrote: > > > > I doubt it, Jeannie... the older Shannons are scattered all over Nicholas > & > > surrounding county homesteads & graveyards from Mt Tabor to Cassidy Creek > & > > beyond. > > > > Chuck > > > > At 02:44 PM 2/6/00 -0700, you wrote: > > >Chuck, do you think I should add the Shannons in the Carlisle cem to the > > >list of stuff... would that benefit her? Jeannie <>< > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: charles r. carter [mailto:cartercr@rma.edu] > > >Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:45 PM > > >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > > > > >The Robert Shannon-Francis Berry combo below is in my Shannon baliwick. > > >Robert has a grandson named Samuel, but I have no proof of a tie to your > > >Samuel. > > > > > >Chuck Carter > > > > > > > > >At 02:12 PM 2/6/00 -0600, you wrote: > > >>Thank you, thank you. Mary > > >> > > >>Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Marriages SHANNON > > >>> > > >>> Ann to Jonas SEARS 8 Sept 1825 > > >>> Elizabeth to Robert HARDWICK 9 Sep 1840 > > >>> John to Betsy PEYTON 14 Aug 1812 > > >>> Jeremiah to Jane McCLANAHAN 9 Apr 1819 > > >>> John to Kiziah ROGERS 0 Aug 1820 > > >>> John to Lausha (?) MORGON 20 Jul 1819 > > >>> Joseph to Jane GRAYHAM 1 Feb 1820 > > >>> Margaret to Jesse HARDWICK 13 Nov 1834 > > >>> Mary to Nathaniel SCOTT 2 Mar 1813 > > >>> Miss to W; SHARP 8 Mar 1840 > > >>> Robert to Frances PERRY/BERRY 12 Jan 1827 > > >>> Samuel to Sally GRAYSON 23 Sep 1812 > > >>> Thomas to Pollyann QUIETT 7 Nov 1838 > > >>> ------------ > > >>> > > >>> 1810 census > > >>> > > >>> Shanan, Margaret 122-- -11-1 - - > > >>> Shanon, John 12-1- 1-1-- - - > > >>> ------------ > > >>> 1820 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, John 1---1- ---1- - - > > >>> Shannon, John Jr. ---1-- 11-- - - > > >>> Shannon John Sr. 3----1 1--1- - - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel 2---1- 2--1- - - > > >>> ------------- > > >>> 1830 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, Jeremiah 21---1------- -1--1-------- - - > > >>> Shannon, Robert 1---1-------- ----1-------- 1 - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel 11-1--1------ 111--1------- - - > > >>> ----------------- > > >>> 1840 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, Jane* -11----------- -----1------- 2 - > > >>> Shannon, Robert 111--1------- 11--1-------- 1 - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel -11---1------ 11-1--1------ - - > > >>> Shannon, Thomas 1---1-------- ----1--------- - - > > >>> ------------- > > >>> 1850 census they can be found on the following pages.... > > >>> > > >>> 391, 449, 454, 467 > > >>> --------- > > >>> jd <>< > > >>> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 10:23 AM > > >>> To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > >>> Subject: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > >>> > > >>> Does anyone have information about a Samuel Shannon who lived in > > >>> Nicholas County in the 1830's whose daughter Margaret married Jesse > > >>> Hardwick on November 13, 1839? I have the marriage record but know > > >>> nothing else about this Shannon family. Any help would be > appreciated. > > >>> Thanks. Mary Miller > > >> > > > > > >

I own the History of Nicholas County; I haven't been to the cemetery but have whatever is in print about it and also the Concord cemetery. Whenever I have been to Nicholas and Bourbon, I've never had any luck locating the older generations, so always assumed they were buried on their own land. I think I've pretty much exhaused the records in print, but I'm not sure. I live in Dallas and we have a pretty good genealogical collection in our library, but sometimes there are other, more obscure records in the original county. Mary Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > OK.... Before I start a lot of typing..... do you have or have you > extracted the information out of the History of Nicholas co.? and have you > been to the Carlisle Cemetery > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:32 PM > To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > Dear Jeannie and Chuck: I have been down on Cassidy Creek--at the time > looking for Hardwicks. What a desolate spot that is! I even stopped > and looked at a decrepid burying ground by a closed church building and > there was a Shannon in there but more recent than my Margaret who died > in 1943. Any help would be appreciated. I've been to Carlisle about > four times to research, but I keep coming up with new names to look > for. A lovely little town, but I'll probably not get back again. > Thanks, Mary Miller > > "charles r. carter" wrote: > > > > I doubt it, Jeannie... the older Shannons are scattered all over Nicholas > & > > surrounding county homesteads & graveyards from Mt Tabor to Cassidy Creek > & > > beyond. > > > > Chuck > > > > At 02:44 PM 2/6/00 -0700, you wrote: > > >Chuck, do you think I should add the Shannons in the Carlisle cem to the > > >list of stuff... would that benefit her? Jeannie <>< > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: charles r. carter [mailto:cartercr@rma.edu] > > >Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:45 PM > > >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > > > > >The Robert Shannon-Francis Berry combo below is in my Shannon baliwick. > > >Robert has a grandson named Samuel, but I have no proof of a tie to your > > >Samuel. > > > > > >Chuck Carter > > > > > > > > >At 02:12 PM 2/6/00 -0600, you wrote: > > >>Thank you, thank you. Mary > > >> > > >>Jean Dalrymple wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Marriages SHANNON > > >>> > > >>> Ann to Jonas SEARS 8 Sept 1825 > > >>> Elizabeth to Robert HARDWICK 9 Sep 1840 > > >>> John to Betsy PEYTON 14 Aug 1812 > > >>> Jeremiah to Jane McCLANAHAN 9 Apr 1819 > > >>> John to Kiziah ROGERS 0 Aug 1820 > > >>> John to Lausha (?) MORGON 20 Jul 1819 > > >>> Joseph to Jane GRAYHAM 1 Feb 1820 > > >>> Margaret to Jesse HARDWICK 13 Nov 1834 > > >>> Mary to Nathaniel SCOTT 2 Mar 1813 > > >>> Miss to W; SHARP 8 Mar 1840 > > >>> Robert to Frances PERRY/BERRY 12 Jan 1827 > > >>> Samuel to Sally GRAYSON 23 Sep 1812 > > >>> Thomas to Pollyann QUIETT 7 Nov 1838 > > >>> ------------ > > >>> > > >>> 1810 census > > >>> > > >>> Shanan, Margaret 122-- -11-1 - - > > >>> Shanon, John 12-1- 1-1-- - - > > >>> ------------ > > >>> 1820 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, John 1---1- ---1- - - > > >>> Shannon, John Jr. ---1-- 11-- - - > > >>> Shannon John Sr. 3----1 1--1- - - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel 2---1- 2--1- - - > > >>> ------------- > > >>> 1830 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, Jeremiah 21---1------- -1--1-------- - - > > >>> Shannon, Robert 1---1-------- ----1-------- 1 - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel 11-1--1------ 111--1------- - - > > >>> ----------------- > > >>> 1840 census > > >>> > > >>> Shannon, Jane* -11----------- -----1------- 2 - > > >>> Shannon, Robert 111--1------- 11--1-------- 1 - > > >>> Shannon, Samuel -11---1------ 11-1--1------ - - > > >>> Shannon, Thomas 1---1-------- ----1--------- - - > > >>> ------------- > > >>> 1850 census they can be found on the following pages.... > > >>> > > >>> 391, 449, 454, 467 > > >>> --------- > > >>> jd <>< > > >>> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 10:23 AM > > >>> To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > > >>> Subject: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > >>> > > >>> Does anyone have information about a Samuel Shannon who lived in > > >>> Nicholas County in the 1830's whose daughter Margaret married Jesse > > >>> Hardwick on November 13, 1839? I have the marriage record but know > > >>> nothing else about this Shannon family. Any help would be > appreciated. > > >>> Thanks. Mary Miller > > >> > > > > > >

OK.... Before I start a lot of typing..... do you have or have you extracted the information out of the History of Nicholas co.? and have you been to the Carlisle Cemetery -----Original Message----- From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:32 PM To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's Dear Jeannie and Chuck: I have been down on Cassidy Creek--at the time looking for Hardwicks. What a desolate spot that is! I even stopped and looked at a decrepid burying ground by a closed church building and there was a Shannon in there but more recent than my Margaret who died in 1943. Any help would be appreciated. I've been to Carlisle about four times to research, but I keep coming up with new names to look for. A lovely little town, but I'll probably not get back again. Thanks, Mary Miller "charles r. carter" wrote: > > I doubt it, Jeannie... the older Shannons are scattered all over Nicholas & > surrounding county homesteads & graveyards from Mt Tabor to Cassidy Creek & > beyond. > > Chuck > > At 02:44 PM 2/6/00 -0700, you wrote: > >Chuck, do you think I should add the Shannons in the Carlisle cem to the > >list of stuff... would that benefit her? Jeannie <>< > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: charles r. carter [mailto:cartercr@rma.edu] > >Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:45 PM > >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > > >The Robert Shannon-Francis Berry combo below is in my Shannon baliwick. > >Robert has a grandson named Samuel, but I have no proof of a tie to your > >Samuel. > > > >Chuck Carter > > > > > >At 02:12 PM 2/6/00 -0600, you wrote: > >>Thank you, thank you. Mary > >> > >>Jean Dalrymple wrote: > >>> > >>> Marriages SHANNON > >>> > >>> Ann to Jonas SEARS 8 Sept 1825 > >>> Elizabeth to Robert HARDWICK 9 Sep 1840 > >>> John to Betsy PEYTON 14 Aug 1812 > >>> Jeremiah to Jane McCLANAHAN 9 Apr 1819 > >>> John to Kiziah ROGERS 0 Aug 1820 > >>> John to Lausha (?) MORGON 20 Jul 1819 > >>> Joseph to Jane GRAYHAM 1 Feb 1820 > >>> Margaret to Jesse HARDWICK 13 Nov 1834 > >>> Mary to Nathaniel SCOTT 2 Mar 1813 > >>> Miss to W; SHARP 8 Mar 1840 > >>> Robert to Frances PERRY/BERRY 12 Jan 1827 > >>> Samuel to Sally GRAYSON 23 Sep 1812 > >>> Thomas to Pollyann QUIETT 7 Nov 1838 > >>> ------------ > >>> > >>> 1810 census > >>> > >>> Shanan, Margaret 122-- -11-1 - - > >>> Shanon, John 12-1- 1-1-- - - > >>> ------------ > >>> 1820 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, John 1---1- ---1- - - > >>> Shannon, John Jr. ---1-- 11-- - - > >>> Shannon John Sr. 3----1 1--1- - - > >>> Shannon, Samuel 2---1- 2--1- - - > >>> ------------- > >>> 1830 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, Jeremiah 21---1------- -1--1-------- - - > >>> Shannon, Robert 1---1-------- ----1-------- 1 - > >>> Shannon, Samuel 11-1--1------ 111--1------- - - > >>> ----------------- > >>> 1840 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, Jane* -11----------- -----1------- 2 - > >>> Shannon, Robert 111--1------- 11--1-------- 1 - > >>> Shannon, Samuel -11---1------ 11-1--1------ - - > >>> Shannon, Thomas 1---1-------- ----1--------- - - > >>> ------------- > >>> 1850 census they can be found on the following pages.... > >>> > >>> 391, 449, 454, 467 > >>> --------- > >>> jd <>< > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 10:23 AM > >>> To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > >>> Subject: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > >>> > >>> Does anyone have information about a Samuel Shannon who lived in > >>> Nicholas County in the 1830's whose daughter Margaret married Jesse > >>> Hardwick on November 13, 1839? I have the marriage record but know > >>> nothing else about this Shannon family. Any help would be appreciated. > >>> Thanks. Mary Miller > >> > > > >

Dear Jeannie and Chuck: I have been down on Cassidy Creek--at the time looking for Hardwicks. What a desolate spot that is! I even stopped and looked at a decrepid burying ground by a closed church building and there was a Shannon in there but more recent than my Margaret who died in 1943. Any help would be appreciated. I've been to Carlisle about four times to research, but I keep coming up with new names to look for. A lovely little town, but I'll probably not get back again. Thanks, Mary Miller "charles r. carter" wrote: > > I doubt it, Jeannie... the older Shannons are scattered all over Nicholas & > surrounding county homesteads & graveyards from Mt Tabor to Cassidy Creek & > beyond. > > Chuck > > At 02:44 PM 2/6/00 -0700, you wrote: > >Chuck, do you think I should add the Shannons in the Carlisle cem to the > >list of stuff... would that benefit her? Jeannie <>< > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: charles r. carter [mailto:cartercr@rma.edu] > >Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 1:45 PM > >To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > >Subject: Re: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > > > >The Robert Shannon-Francis Berry combo below is in my Shannon baliwick. > >Robert has a grandson named Samuel, but I have no proof of a tie to your > >Samuel. > > > >Chuck Carter > > > > > >At 02:12 PM 2/6/00 -0600, you wrote: > >>Thank you, thank you. Mary > >> > >>Jean Dalrymple wrote: > >>> > >>> Marriages SHANNON > >>> > >>> Ann to Jonas SEARS 8 Sept 1825 > >>> Elizabeth to Robert HARDWICK 9 Sep 1840 > >>> John to Betsy PEYTON 14 Aug 1812 > >>> Jeremiah to Jane McCLANAHAN 9 Apr 1819 > >>> John to Kiziah ROGERS 0 Aug 1820 > >>> John to Lausha (?) MORGON 20 Jul 1819 > >>> Joseph to Jane GRAYHAM 1 Feb 1820 > >>> Margaret to Jesse HARDWICK 13 Nov 1834 > >>> Mary to Nathaniel SCOTT 2 Mar 1813 > >>> Miss to W; SHARP 8 Mar 1840 > >>> Robert to Frances PERRY/BERRY 12 Jan 1827 > >>> Samuel to Sally GRAYSON 23 Sep 1812 > >>> Thomas to Pollyann QUIETT 7 Nov 1838 > >>> ------------ > >>> > >>> 1810 census > >>> > >>> Shanan, Margaret 122-- -11-1 - - > >>> Shanon, John 12-1- 1-1-- - - > >>> ------------ > >>> 1820 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, John 1---1- ---1- - - > >>> Shannon, John Jr. ---1-- 11-- - - > >>> Shannon John Sr. 3----1 1--1- - - > >>> Shannon, Samuel 2---1- 2--1- - - > >>> ------------- > >>> 1830 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, Jeremiah 21---1------- -1--1-------- - - > >>> Shannon, Robert 1---1-------- ----1-------- 1 - > >>> Shannon, Samuel 11-1--1------ 111--1------- - - > >>> ----------------- > >>> 1840 census > >>> > >>> Shannon, Jane* -11----------- -----1------- 2 - > >>> Shannon, Robert 111--1------- 11--1-------- 1 - > >>> Shannon, Samuel -11---1------ 11-1--1------ - - > >>> Shannon, Thomas 1---1-------- ----1--------- - - > >>> ------------- > >>> 1850 census they can be found on the following pages.... > >>> > >>> 391, 449, 454, 467 > >>> --------- > >>> jd <>< > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Mary L. Miller [mailto:mchickm@flash.net] > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 10:23 AM > >>> To: KYNICHOL-L@rootsweb.com > >>> Subject: [KYNICHOL] Samuel Shannon-1830's > >>> > >>> Does anyone have information about a Samuel Shannon who lived in > >>> Nicholas County in the 1830's whose daughter Margaret married Jesse > >>> Hardwick on November 13, 1839? I have the marriage record but know > >>> nothing else about this Shannon family. Any help would be appreciated. > >>> Thanks. Mary Miller > >> > > > >