Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [KYGRAYSO] Foreman/Johnson
    2. Alice Warner
    3. Seriously, I haven't had time to work on anything serious in a few months because I had a heavy load of classes in college. Please check the dates on whatever file you were checking as my working file, I daresay I have not updated online files in a while, so you wouldn't know the details of my working file. As well, I was very specific in my message board reply as to exactly what I had regarding the Foreman/Johnson line, where I got it, and a suggested lead for the individual to take, along with a mention that i had *not* personally done that background checking on the line myself yet. That I had not obtained the deed. For my whole project: Yes, I have a lot more checking to do. When anyone does anything on any magnitude as large as my project there will always be errors and it is my goal to work as hard as possible to not only correct errors in my research but provide enough sources for my information that others can make their own decisions on the links in my family research. I have not ignored you, we have previously communicated. I know not everyone is a direct descendant. I am sorry that you have always had personal issues with the ways I have conducted my research and I wish that when I make a specific comment with specific ideas that you do not flame me publicly on mailing lists and forums. There was nothing in my original post that stated any false facts. It stated what a previous researcher had determined, and the sources she had used as well as my opinion that the deed listed could shed light on one of the links that the individual had inquired. I even stated that I did not have further information, as well as that I was *working* on my project. Working implying not final by any means. You may choose personally that the large amounts of research I have conducted including the large amount of images of original documents and tombstones I have made publicly available to be bunk. You may choose to ignore anything I say and believe only your own ideas. I'm tired of the public flaming, even though it's been a while. Alice Warner On Jan 20, 2008 10:51 PM, Charles Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > Alice, you have a lot more checking to do. Believe me. Took a look at your > working files last week. I've given you info before. You choose to ignore > me. We've spoken before as I'm sure you know. Everyone you are listen to > though is not a direct descendent ........and still kicking. JSF > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:28 PM > Subject: Re: [KYGRAYSO] Foreman/Johnson > > > > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > > > Author: alice9636 > > Surnames: > > Classification: queries > > > > Message Board URL: > > > > > http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.kentucky.counties.grayson/9769.2/mb.ashx > > > > Message Board Post: > > > > Kathleen Warren in the 1980s did list Polly as a Johnson. Her sources > for > > all the descendants of Arthur Foreman Jr and Sarah Sally Embry (Cader's > > parents) are: > > "Patricia Joan Conkwright, Dundee KY > > Ohio county Marriage and Census records > > Butler County Deed Book S, p. 461-463. Sale by Cader Embry heirs, > > 5-6-1864" > > > > I have been working carefully to try to go over all her research also > > adding my own as I work on an Embry descendancy. > > > > I don't have a copy of that deed but it may lead to proof of her name > > being Johnson (although I can't swear to it, and the listing of proof > was > > not complete). > > > > Since I have been into the Embry descendancy and Polly was just a wife > of > > a descendant, I know nothing further of her ancestry. > > > > > > Alice Warner > > > > Important Note: > > The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you > > would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link > > above and respond on the board. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1234 - Release Date: > 1/20/2008 > > 2:15 PM > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    01/20/2008 04:40:43
    1. Re: [KYGRAYSO] Foreman/Johnson
    2. Charles Farris
    3. My apologies to one and all especially to Alice!!!!! Best of luck with your classes. I'm sure you will do well. It was my understanding you had graduated and were writing a boo, Again, I'm sorry. Sue ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alice Warner" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [KYGRAYSO] Foreman/Johnson > Seriously, I haven't had time to work on anything serious in a few months > because I had a heavy load of classes in college. > > Please check the dates on whatever file you were checking as my working > file, I daresay I have not updated online files in a while, so you > wouldn't > know the details of my working file. > > As well, I was very specific in my message board reply as to exactly what > I > had regarding the Foreman/Johnson line, where I got it, and a suggested > lead > for the individual to take, along with a mention that i had *not* > personally > done that background checking on the line myself yet. That I had not > obtained the deed. > > For my whole project: Yes, I have a lot more checking to do. When anyone > does anything on any magnitude as large as my project there will always be > errors and it is my goal to work as hard as possible to not only correct > errors in my research but provide enough sources for my information that > others can make their own decisions on the links in my family research. > > I have not ignored you, we have previously communicated. I know not > everyone > is a direct descendant. I am sorry that you have always had personal > issues > with the ways I have conducted my research and I wish that when I make a > specific comment with specific ideas that you do not flame me publicly on > mailing lists and forums. > > There was nothing in my original post that stated any false facts. It > stated > what a previous researcher had determined, and the sources she had used as > well as my opinion that the deed listed could shed light on one of the > links > that the individual had inquired. I even stated that I did not have > further > information, as well as that I was *working* on my project. Working > implying > not final by any means. > > You may choose personally that the large amounts of research I have > conducted including the large amount of images of original documents and > tombstones I have made publicly available to be bunk. You may choose to > ignore anything I say and believe only your own ideas. I'm tired of the > public flaming, even though it's been a while. > > Alice Warner > > On Jan 20, 2008 10:51 PM, Charles Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Alice, you have a lot more checking to do. Believe me. Took a look at >> your >> working files last week. I've given you info before. You choose to ignore >> me. We've spoken before as I'm sure you know. Everyone you are listen >> to >> though is not a direct descendent ........and still kicking. JSF >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:28 PM >> Subject: Re: [KYGRAYSO] Foreman/Johnson >> >> >> > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. >> > >> > Author: alice9636 >> > Surnames: >> > Classification: queries >> > >> > Message Board URL: >> > >> > >> http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.kentucky.counties.grayson/9769.2/mb.ashx >> > >> > Message Board Post: >> > >> > Kathleen Warren in the 1980s did list Polly as a Johnson. Her sources >> for >> > all the descendants of Arthur Foreman Jr and Sarah Sally Embry (Cader's >> > parents) are: >> > "Patricia Joan Conkwright, Dundee KY >> > Ohio county Marriage and Census records >> > Butler County Deed Book S, p. 461-463. Sale by Cader Embry heirs, >> > 5-6-1864" >> > >> > I have been working carefully to try to go over all her research also >> > adding my own as I work on an Embry descendancy. >> > >> > I don't have a copy of that deed but it may lead to proof of her name >> > being Johnson (although I can't swear to it, and the listing of proof >> was >> > not complete). >> > >> > Since I have been into the Embry descendancy and Polly was just a wife >> of >> > a descendant, I know nothing further of her ancestry. >> > >> > >> > Alice Warner >> > >> > Important Note: >> > The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you >> > would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link >> > above and respond on the board. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > >> > >> > -- >> > No virus found in this incoming message. >> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1234 - Release Date: >> 1/20/2008 >> > 2:15 PM >> > >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1234 - Release Date: 1/20/2008 > 2:15 PM > >

    01/20/2008 03:09:00