In a message dated 3/6/2005 11:49:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, dennyswreck@fastmail.fm writes: goes back to Lettie Durham and "that set of Howards" This is somehing that has had me stumped for a long time. I also saw once in a Kentucky Explorer, somebody referred to the "Lower set of Howards". Does it mean that not all of the Howards descended from Samuel Howard?