Eula May Estes Livesay. 91. Died February 19, 2007 Scottsville, KY. Metcalfe, KY native. Parents: late Claude Estes and Lida Ann England Estes. Husband: late Leon Livesay. Survivors: sons and daughters-in-law; Billy and Jean Livesay, Rondel and Leucercia Livesay. Burial: Allen County Memorial Gardens. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, Febuary 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Gladys W. Harmon. 84. Died February 18, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Allen County native. Parents: late Lester Walker Sr., and Mona Stone Walker. Husband: late W. C. "Carlis" Harmon. Survivors: daughter, Vanaey Harmon Greenup: sisters and brother-in-law; Rethel Walker Smith, Corine Walker and James Moss, Pearl Walker Wilson: sisters-in-law; Regina Walker Foushee, Ina Rea Walker. Predeceased by: sister, Frances Williams: brothers; Lester Walker Jr., Earl Walker. Burial: Mount Union Cemetery, Halfway, KY. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, Febuary 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Bill Randall. 79. Died February 17, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Flint, MI native. Parents: late Clarence Willard Randall and Ilma Mae Kenyon Randall. Survivors: wife, Janet Marie Trent Randall: daughters and sons-in-law; Charlotte Ann and David Howett, Marcia Kay and Russ Daubert: brothers and sister-in-law; Robert and Gail Randall, Max DeFields: sister and brother-in-law; Betty and Albert Sperling: brother-in-law, John "Jack" Trent and his wife, Ruth Marie. Burial: Allen County Memorial Gardens. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, February 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

> Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! With the web there is simply no way to avoid this if one shares genealogical information at all. Often this is completely unimtentional and inadvertant. I, for one, know I can't remember just where each piece of information came from in an old file constructed when I was using PAF or FTM. However, now that I'm using The Master Genealogist (TMG) I can and am documenting every single bit of data I enter. The learning curve for TMG is difficult, but the time is well spent if one wants full and complete documentation. And, no, I have absolutely no financial interest in this software! As is continually repeated, one cannot depend upon any secondary research . . . and everything on the web which is not an image of the original is secondary research . . . and even an image can be "enhanced;" i.e., Photoshopped if one is determine to do so. Now, may I vent my frustration as a suggestion--without it being taken as a flame? Mine is e-mail which answer another e-mail and repeat the entire original message. Mimi's message must have been repeated at least three times and each of these repeats is now archived at RootsWeb, taking up unnecessary space. Can we all just learn to cut and paste?

In a message dated 3/4/2007 1:38:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wallyjakeandme@msn.com writes: A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com Unfortunately, Ancestry.com and other genealogical sites do not allow corrections or notes. For that reason, the only site I submit GEDCOM's too is Rootsweb's WorldConnect site. About once a year I remove the old data and resubmit updated information. However, because Rootsweb is a subsidiary of Ancestry.com (it was taken over by another company recently who's name doesn't come to mind), Ancestry does pick up the lineage's posted on WorldConnect. When uploading information to WorldConnect, one of the options the submitter can choose is whether to allow Gedcom's to be downloaded from the information. I always click "no" - for many reasons, one being Mimi's concern. I also choose "no" when asked whether notes and source material can be posted. Too many times I have found information posted that has been copied and shared by other unknown persons who don't give credit to their source. Like Mimi, it isn't about the sharing, but a lot of my research is from primary documents - often obtained by in numerous hours in time, travel expenses, document copies, etc, and I tend to resent the fact that someone else claims the rights to my efforts. Everything I gather, I post on one website or another because I understand the frustration of looking for information while living hundreds of miles away from the source. I decided years ago that with my email address provided, anyone with questions concerning the information can contact me for sources and corrections in case of an error I made. Now, I'll get off my soapbox and change the subject a little. For those that are new to the email list, or have been around awhile, I would like to remind everyone that all the information and messages of this list are archived so you can search for information that someone else may have asked years ago and received an answer that may be useful to your current search. Go to: _http://lists.rootsweb.com/_ (http://lists.rootsweb.com/) Type in KYALLEN in the KeyWord Search. That will take you to over 3500 messages which you can search by topic, surname, etc. Happy Hunting Sharon Tabor <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.

Yes DON....you're right about that. Several years ago, I emailed copies of a legal documents to a highly respected fellow researcher whom I shared an ancestral connection. I was happy to share. Since this material was in itself the kind of material one uses as documentation, I felt it should be shared. Later, she emailed me and asked if I would give her permission to submit it to another genealogical site and my answer was of course, an absolute, "YES". Sharing comes easy and that's the beauty of the internet when it's done in the right way. Getting the credit and spot light for being the one to post the document was unimportant to me. What WAS important was the fact that it was submitted and posted for all researchers to use in their own research at a later date. And so.....the data was posted with permission and that's all that mattered. Everyone was happy. Thanks for your reply Don, and thanks for your thoughts on the topic. Mimi ----- Original Message ----- From: Don Burris<mailto:Don_Burris@msn.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 1:37 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Hi Mimi! I too have seen this and not limited to yourself. Unfortunately, it is too easy for someone to take files such as yours that you have shared with fellow researchers as you have done with me and to forward those files to Ancestry ETAL., without removing the owners name etc.. I am NOT the guilty one and never would be one to do so and justly for the same reasons that you stated. It's a sad statement for genealogy for others to "Plagiarize" without any consent from the owner and represent that information as correct without proof. This is why I do not put sources on my forwards but, will supply upon request. I would imagine that you have given some of your files to another researcher and, that person has sent it on to others who have posted it as Gospel. You have the right to be angry. Vent away!!! Let this be a lesson to others on how to share your research. Sharing is what this is all about and asking the recipient not to publish should be attached. Best, Don ----- Original Message ----- From: Mimi Alexander<mailto:wallyjakeandme@msn.com<mailto:wallyjakeandme@msn.com>> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com%3Cmailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com>> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:36 AM Subject: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Hello List, While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be co! rr! ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! Mimi ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com%3Cmailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Mimi, I understand your frustration but genealogy has changed so rapidly in recent years that I don't know the solution is available at present. With Family Tree Maker, a merge of family or people is just a click away. Unfortunately, they don't currently have a method of preserving the source with those merges. When people are trying to gather information, I believe they will merge very likely people and the available data. I do this myself. Sometimes, I am able to confirm further proof but with so many different lines, it's hard to keep every one of them in pristine form. I think what happens is that in the case of FTM, it will prompt people to contribute their information at certain milestones, such as "Congratulations! You have 3,000 people in your file! Would you like to submit your information?" People get some gratification at this little "pat on the back" but don't realize that everything they have is not necessarily correct or sourced. The only thing that I can say is that I don't take anything for granted, and sometimes this information is obviously not a match or valid, in which case I delete individuals or change information about them. It's a constant work-in-progress. But sometimes these little hints may help find the path to the real information. I found an old file in Word from years ago before the advent of the current FTM - I may have been using Brother's Keeper back then, or maybe nothing at all. I found a name, Margaret West, for the wife of my ancestor Alexander Hogue that I didn't remember seeing or had ever entered into my records. As it turned out, the surname was correct but Alexander's wife was Louvicy - Margaret was her sister! This led me to something I had been searching for for 10 years or so! I think that it would be good if Ancestry.com/FTM could be convinced to find a way to mark unproven records as such and to provide the most recent sources with each merge. I don't know if this helps any, but I think this is why and how this is happening. : ) Martha in Dayton, Ohio Mimi Alexander wrote: > Hello List, > > While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! > ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. > > Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! > > Mimi > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- ÐÏࡱá

Thanks Martha, and you too, Sharon Clark, for your thoughts on the subject. It does help to know I'm not alone in my views and that others understand the problem. The thing that really bugged me was that, "I personally", had never submitted my own ancestral files and yet.....there they were, ERRORS included made from a zillion years ago! That was how I knew without a doubt that it was mine! Since making those errors many years ago, I've learned the true facts, (names, dates, locations, and spelling of names for example), and have since corrected and documented those earlier incorrect errors, but there it was at ancestry.com - the incorrect data for anyone to see and believe. Maybe Ancestry should have a place to fill out that lists the, "source of documentation", and if there is none, then a certain, "icon", is placed next to that information printed? this way the reader is notified that the data might not be correct. Well...I have that off my chest now so I guess I feel better ~ Thanks you Guys! Mimi ----- Original Message ----- From: Martha Hardcastle Guthrie<mailto:Mothra@woh.rr.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Mimi, I understand your frustration but genealogy has changed so rapidly in recent years that I don't know the solution is available at present. With Family Tree Maker, a merge of family or people is just a click away. Unfortunately, they don't currently have a method of preserving the source with those merges. When people are trying to gather information, I believe they will merge very likely people and the available data. I do this myself. Sometimes, I am able to confirm further proof but with so many different lines, it's hard to keep every one of them in pristine form. I think what happens is that in the case of FTM, it will prompt people to contribute their information at certain milestones, such as "Congratulations! You have 3,000 people in your file! Would you like to submit your information?" People get some gratification at this little "pat on the back" but don't realize that everything they have is not necessarily correct or sourced. The only thing that I can say is that I don't take anything for granted, and sometimes this information is obviously not a match or valid, in which case I delete individuals or change information about them. It's a constant work-in-progress. But sometimes these little hints may help find the path to the real information. I found an old file in Word from years ago before the advent of the current FTM - I may have been using Brother's Keeper back then, or maybe nothing at all. I found a name, Margaret West, for the wife of my ancestor Alexander Hogue that I didn't remember seeing or had ever entered into my records. As it turned out, the surname was correct but Alexander's wife was Louvicy - Margaret was her sister! This led me to something I had been searching for for 10 years or so! I think that it would be good if Ancestry.com/FTM could be convinced to find a way to mark unproven records as such and to provide the most recent sources with each merge. I don't know if this helps any, but I think this is why and how this is happening. : ) Martha in Dayton, Ohio Mimi Alexander wrote: > Hello List, > > While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! > ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. > > Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! > > Mimi > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- ÐÏࡱá ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Mimi! I too have seen this and not limited to yourself. Unfortunately, it is too easy for someone to take files such as yours that you have shared with fellow researchers as you have done with me and to forward those files to Ancestry ETAL., without removing the owners name etc.. I am NOT the guilty one and never would be one to do so and justly for the same reasons that you stated. It's a sad statement for genealogy for others to "Plagiarize" without any consent from the owner and represent that information as correct without proof. This is why I do not put sources on my forwards but, will supply upon request. I would imagine that you have given some of your files to another researcher and, that person has sent it on to others who have posted it as Gospel. You have the right to be angry. Vent away!!! Let this be a lesson to others on how to share your research. Sharing is what this is all about and asking the recipient not to publish should be attached. Best, Don ----- Original Message ----- From: Mimi Alexander<mailto:wallyjakeandme@msn.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:36 AM Subject: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Hello List, While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! Mimi ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello List, While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be correct. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! Mimi

Allen County was formed from parts of Barren Co & Warren Co in 1815. For those of you whose ancestors lived in the Warren Co section, and tended to move back and forth between Allen & Warren, you might want to visit _www.rootsweb.com/~kywarren_ (http://www.rootsweb.com/~kywarren) and check the Cemetery Section. The Pioneer Cemetery in Bowling Green, inventoried by Martha Hardcastle in 1939 has been added, and her inventory of Fairview Cemetery is in the process of being posted. Between these 2 cemeteries, there will eventually be about 5000 names added to what Mike Wilson and other's have provided. Many of these headstones were in bad shape when she transcribed the information 69 years ago, so I am sure a walk through these cemeteries today would not provide the information she took the time to preserve. Doing a site search for Warren Co won't deliver all the results, as some of the cemeteries added are linked to other sites, and the search engine does not spider those sites. But it's worth your time surf the information. If you do a search today for the current cemeteries, there may not be the same results if you do a site search next week. FreeFind, who graciously provides the search technology for free genealogy, usually only spiders the sites weekly. Happy Hunting. Sharon Tabor <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.

At least one Braswell family went to Missouri but I don't know which county. <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.

Regarding KY-MO migration, I do have a couple of families that migrated from Allen Co. to Reynolds Co. MO.....this was in the mid-1850's. They were DINKINS/STEWART and DINKINS/HARRISON families. Those are the only ones I know about at this time. Anita Tally Missouri ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mimi Alexander" <wallyjakeandme@msn.com> To: <kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:43 AM Subject: [KYALLEN] Alllen Co to Vernon Co., Missouri ? > Good Morning, List, > > A curious thought here..... Did any of your Allen County, KY ancestors > migrate to the Vernon County, Missouri area in the mid - 1800's? It could > also include surrounding counties such as, Bates, Barton, Cedar, and > Sinclair Counties, Missouri. Possibly some were there during the Civil > War? > > Thanks ~ > > Mimi > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Needham Holland and Matilda Blankenship 1850 Benton Co., MO, Needham and Martha (2nd wife) 1860, 1870 Vernon Co., MO. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mimi Alexander<mailto:wallyjakeandme@msn.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:43 AM Subject: [KYALLEN] Alllen Co to Vernon Co., Missouri ? Good Morning, List, A curious thought here..... Did any of your Allen County, KY ancestors migrate to the Vernon County, Missouri area in the mid - 1800's? It could also include surrounding counties such as, Bates, Barton, Cedar, and Sinclair Counties, Missouri. Possibly some were there during the Civil War? Thanks ~ Mimi ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Yes, I had families go to Cedar and Jasper Cos. In MO. Add Gentry in northern MO as well (Culp, Howell, Cook). Kevin R. Marsh -----Original Message----- From: kyallen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kyallen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mimi Alexander Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:44 AM To: kyallen@rootsweb.com Subject: [KYALLEN] Alllen Co to Vernon Co., Missouri ? Good Morning, List, A curious thought here..... Did any of your Allen County, KY ancestors migrate to the Vernon County, Missouri area in the mid - 1800's? It could also include surrounding counties such as, Bates, Barton, Cedar, and Sinclair Counties, Missouri. Possibly some were there during the Civil War? Thanks ~ Mimi ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Good Morning, List, A curious thought here..... Did any of your Allen County, KY ancestors migrate to the Vernon County, Missouri area in the mid - 1800's? It could also include surrounding counties such as, Bates, Barton, Cedar, and Sinclair Counties, Missouri. Possibly some were there during the Civil War? Thanks ~ Mimi

In the 1850 census for Allen Co., KY. there is a DAVID BORDERS living with Wiley G. Harrisons family, pg 21a person #306. I believe this David is the son of DAVID BORDERS and ELIZABETH HARRISON, I am curious to know if this Elizabeth Harrison is the daughter of William and Peggy Strader Harrison or if anyone knows for sure who her parents were. I would be so grateful for any info on this family line.....thanks, Sandy Simmons Mince

<J. D. Woods. 76. Died February 7, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Allen County native. Parent: late Ina Graves Woods. > Would anyone know if this INA GRAVES WOODS is the daughter of James M. Graves? If so I would love any info on this family.....thanks Sandy Simmons Mince

J. D. Woods. 76. Died February 7, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Allen County native. Parent: late Ina Graves Woods. Survivors: wife, Sue Fowler Woods: daughters and sons-in-law; Patricia and Warden Shouse, Peggy and Roger Carter: former son-in-law, Victor Tate. Predeceased by: sons; Jerry Woods, Jim Woods: granddaughter, Lindsey Mechelle Carter: maternal grandparents, Thomas and Sadie Woods. Burial: Walker's Chapel Cemetery. Refer to The Citizen-Times, February 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

George W. "Billy" Rowe. 65. Died February 8, 2007 Lafayette, TN. Trousdale County, TN native. Parents: late William Howard and Lucy Cornwell Rowe. Survivors: wife, Glenda Proffitt Rowe: sons and daughter-in-law; David Neil Rowe, William Keith Rowe, Michael Shane and Jennette Rowe: sister and brother-in-law; Martha and Rickey Hesson: brother and sister-in-law; Holland and Jamie Rowe: stepsons; Matt Turner, Tommy Turner,and wife, Jennifer: stepdaughter and husband; Huetta and Rickey Murphy. Predeceased by sister, Rosemary West. Burial: Tompkinsville Memoirial Gardens. Refer to The Citizen-Times, February 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com