William Jeffery McIntyre. 50. Died March 15, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Logan County, KY native. Parents: Harold McIntyre and Oma Page McIntyre, who survive. Other survivors: wife, Christie Logan McIntyre: son, Brycen McIntyre: daughter, Jaleigh McIntyre: stepdaughter, Chanley Gray: brother and sister-in-law; Steve and Gina McIntyre: his mother and father-in-law, Jerry and Brenda Anderson, a special nephew. Burial: Bowling Green Gardens. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Christopher Estep. 72. Died March 15, 2007 Beech Grove, IN. Hyden, KY native. Parents: late Thomas and Ola Estep. Survivors: wife, Dorothy C. Estep: sons and daughters-in-law; Christopher Estep Jr., Thomas and Donna Estep, Donald Estep, David Estep: daughters and sons-in-law; Carol A. Lipp, Donna Estep, Mary Estep, Elizabeth and Jerry Arnold, Linda and Wiley Croy: two brothers, one sister, eleven grandchildren. Predeceased by: brother, Charlie Estep: sister, Mae Webb. Burial: Forest Lawn Memory Gardens. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Rosetta Wilkins. 85. Died March 15, 2007, Scottsville, KY. Predeceased by: husband, Jim Wilkins. Survivors: son and daughter-in-law; Jim and Gwen Wilkins: daughters and sons-in-law; Lois Wilkins McGlothlin and Monroe Brown, Margaret and Danny Huffines. Crafton Funeral Home. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Virginia Nadine McReynolds Spencer. 89. Died March 14, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Allen County native. Parents: late Aaron McReynolds and Ruth Williams McReynolds. Husband: late Milton Spencer. Survivors: daughters and son-in-law; Ruth and Alan King,, Marian Spencer: brother and sister-in-law; Maurice and Laura McReynolds. Predeceased by: grandson, Bradford King. Burial: Crescent Hill Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Mildred Bohanon Napier. 80. Died March 5, 2007 Lafayette, TN. Monroe County native. Parents: late Luther and Dellar White Bohanon. Husband: late Ralph Joel Napier. Survivors: daughter and son-in-law; Sandra and Larry Williams: sons and daughters-in-law; Randy and Brenda Napier, Rocky and LeAnn Napier. Predeceased by: sister, Lorene Manion: brother, Vernie Bohanon. Burial: Underwood Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Ardith Mae Witcher. 81. Died March 11, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Allen County, KY native. Parents: late Lewis Walter Victory Sr., and Fennie Ella Ross Victory. Husband: late John Ray Witcher. Survivors: son and daughter-in-law; Andrew "Fummy" and Regina Witcher: daughters and sons-in-law; Jean and Bud Ransom, Lucille "Sue" and W. D. Payne: stepdaughter-in-law, Mildred Witcher: brother and sister-in-law; Jr. and Jo Victory: two granddaughters. Predeceased by: stepsons; Aubrey Morris Witcher, Orville Wayne Witcher: brothers; Frank Virctory, James Victory: sisters; Vera Tinsley, Emmer Pearl Smith. Burial: Chestnut Point Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Martha Brown Michael. 31. Died March 6, 2007 Nashville, TN. Allen County, KY native. Parents: late Douglas Rene Brown and Lena Frances Aaron Ford, who survives. Other survivors: stepfather, Raymond Ford: son, Cody Clay Clark of Asheville, N.C.: brothers; James Brown and his companion, Melissa Emmons, Jeff Brown: sisters and brothers-in-law; Sandra and Asa Means, Tammy and Jessie Witcher: special aunt and uncle, Billy and Virginia Sullivan. Predeceased by: daughter, Marsha Darlene Blankenship. Burial: Macedonia Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Bruce Andrew Smyth. 53. Died March 9, 2007 Scottsville, KY. Doylestown, PA native. Parents: late Roy Wilbur Smyth and Helena Ingebor Czernicka Smyth, who survives. Other survivors: daughters; Stephanie Marie Smyth, Jennifer Lynn Smyth: brothers; David Ralph Smyth, Glenn Marcus Smyth: sister, Joan P. Clouse. Burial: Crescent Hill Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Anna Lovenuia "Cricket" Rippy. 80. Died March 6, 2007 Scottsville, KY. Allen County native. Parents: late Charles Luther Wood and Flora Ethel Crowder Wood. Survivors: husband, Harold Wayne Rippy: son and daughter-in-law; David K. and Teresa Rippy: daughters and sons-in-law; Darlene and Rick Scott, Dana Wayne and Craig Boden. Predeceased by: brothers; Maxie Wood, Hexel Wood, Rondal Wood: sisters; Jeanetta Patterson, Calcia Wood, Uldine Parrish. Burial: Shiloh Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Evalee Worley Denney. 87. Died March 10, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Wayne County native. Parents: late John Calvin Worley and Melvina Vaughn Worley. Husband: late Elbert L. Denney. Survivors: daughters; Ina Denney Troxell, Charlotte Denney Souders: sister, Thelma Corder: grandson, Chris Little. Predeceased by: daughter, Wileen Denney Little: sister, Ethel Worley. Burial: Fairview Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

William Anthony "Bill" Mann Jr. 69. Died March 9, 2007 Auburn, KY. Allen County, KY native. Parents: late William Anthony Mann Sr. and Ettie Odell Eakles Mann. Survivors: sons; William Russell Mann and his wife, Tammy, Steven Michael Mann and his companion, Sherry Henry: sister and brother-in-law; Clytie and Fred Huntsman: two grandchildren. Burial: Mt. Union United Methodist Church Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Lina B. Knight. 94. Died March 11, 2007 Rochester, N.Y. Husband: late Walter E. Knight. Survivors: daughter, Susan Keenan: sister-in-law, Frances Wooten: one granddaughter. Predeceased by: daughter, Carol Huffman. Burial: Crescent Hill Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Willis Estell Watt. 87. Died March 9, 2007 Bowling Green, KY. Warren County, KY native. Parents: late Gentry Watt and Ollie Hunt Watt. Survivors: sons and daughters-in-law; Estell and Linda Watt, Harold and Patricia Watt, Larry and Hazel Watt, Donnie and Dorothy Watt: daughters and sons-in-law; Diane and James Hurt, Carolyn and Floyd Hawks: brother, Cleo Watt: sister, Earline Thomas. Predeceased by: sons; Kenny Watt, Billy Ray Watt, Stephen Watt: sisters; Irene Lancaster, Hallie Cowles. Burial: Boiling Springs Church of Christ Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 15, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

Hello, a quick "ouch", I went looking through rootsweb, to see of any direction to go on a relative, and found some of my research with my family stories that was told to me by my grandmother, mom and other relatives. And personal stories...... So I know they got it from my research I had shared with one relative and he thought he was doing a good thing to share. But they took it as their own. So understand your frustrations. Marcia >From: Shirley <malone_kid2@bellsouth.net> >Date: 2007/03/13 Tue PM 05:36:35 CDT >To: kyallen@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? >Amen, Mimi. Oh, yes! They somehow managed to get my information as well. I >once bought an FTM update that came with one of their CDs. I couldn't >believe that it had so many of my family names on it. Then I found they had >my "work-in-progress" on it was the reason for all of my family names. It >was really maddening to pay for my own work. >Shirley > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mimi Alexander" <wallyjakeandme@msn.com> >To: <kyallen@rootsweb.com> >Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:46 PM >Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? > > >Thanks Martha, and you too, Sharon Clark, for your thoughts on the subject. > >It does help to know I'm not alone in my views and that others understand >the problem. The thing that really bugged me was that, "I personally", >had never submitted my own ancestral files and yet.....there they were, >ERRORS included made from a zillion years ago! That was how I knew without >a doubt that it was mine! Since making those errors many years ago, I've >learned the true facts, (names, dates, locations, and spelling of names for >example), and have since corrected and documented those earlier incorrect >errors, but there it was at ancestry.com - the incorrect data for anyone >to see and believe. Maybe Ancestry should have a place to fill out that >lists the, "source of documentation", and if there is none, then a >certain, "icon", is placed next to that information printed? this way the >reader is notified that the data might not be correct. > >Well...I have that off my chest now so I guess I feel better ~ > >Thanks you Guys! > >Mimi > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Martha Hardcastle Guthrie<mailto:Mothra@woh.rr.com> > To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:55 PM > Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? > > > Mimi, > > I understand your frustration but genealogy has changed so rapidly in > recent years that I don't know the solution is available at present. > > With Family Tree Maker, a merge of family or people is just a click > away. Unfortunately, they don't currently have a method of preserving > the source with those merges. When people are trying to gather > information, I believe they will merge very likely people and the > available data. I do this myself. Sometimes, I am able to confirm > further proof but with so many different lines, it's hard to keep every > one of them in pristine form. > > I think what happens is that in the case of FTM, it will prompt people > to contribute their information at certain milestones, such as > "Congratulations! You have 3,000 people in your file! Would you like to > submit your information?" People get some gratification at this little > "pat on the back" but don't realize that everything they have is not > necessarily correct or sourced. > > The only thing that I can say is that I don't take anything for granted, > and sometimes this information is obviously not a match or valid, in > which case I delete individuals or change information about them. It's a > constant work-in-progress. But sometimes these little hints may help > find the path to the real information. > > I found an old file in Word from years ago before the advent of the > current FTM - I may have been using Brother's Keeper back then, or maybe > nothing at all. I found a name, Margaret West, for the wife of my > ancestor Alexander Hogue that I didn't remember seeing or had ever > entered into my records. As it turned out, the surname was correct but > Alexander's wife was Louvicy - Margaret was her sister! This led me to > something I had been searching for for 10 years or so! > > I think that it would be good if Ancestry.com/FTM could be convinced to > find a way to mark unproven records as such and to provide the most > recent sources with each merge. > > I don't know if this helps any, but I think this is why and how this is > happening. > : ) > Martha in Dayton, Ohio > > Mimi Alexander wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: >ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any >other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and >research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. >My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while >"some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with >documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a >certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for >viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. >How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it >without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to >share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been >validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com >will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! > > ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me >to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I >send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person >exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, >I tell them that as well. > > > > Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this >matter! > > > > Mimi > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the >word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the >message > > > > > > > > -- > ÐÏࡱá > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the >word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the >message > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >in the subject and the body of the message > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Marcia

You know, this is scary. I am going to look for mine. I did find my name in my ex-husbands family file. I was a little irritated that my permission was not even obtained for this. I was under the impression that people simply put 'living' for someone if it goes online? Good hunting everyone. Bethel -----Original Message----- From: kyallen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kyallen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Shirley Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:37 PM To: kyallen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Amen, Mimi. Oh, yes! They somehow managed to get my information as well. I once bought an FTM update that came with one of their CDs. I couldn't believe that it had so many of my family names on it. Then I found they had my "work-in-progress" on it was the reason for all of my family names. It was really maddening to pay for my own work. Shirley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mimi Alexander" <wallyjakeandme@msn.com> To: <kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Thanks Martha, and you too, Sharon Clark, for your thoughts on the subject. It does help to know I'm not alone in my views and that others understand the problem. The thing that really bugged me was that, "I personally", had never submitted my own ancestral files and yet.....there they were, ERRORS included made from a zillion years ago! That was how I knew without a doubt that it was mine! Since making those errors many years ago, I've learned the true facts, (names, dates, locations, and spelling of names for example), and have since corrected and documented those earlier incorrect errors, but there it was at ancestry.com - the incorrect data for anyone to see and believe. Maybe Ancestry should have a place to fill out that lists the, "source of documentation", and if there is none, then a certain, "icon", is placed next to that information printed? this way the reader is notified that the data might not be correct. Well...I have that off my chest now so I guess I feel better ~ Thanks you Guys! Mimi ----- Original Message ----- From: Martha Hardcastle Guthrie<mailto:Mothra@woh.rr.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Mimi, I understand your frustration but genealogy has changed so rapidly in recent years that I don't know the solution is available at present. With Family Tree Maker, a merge of family or people is just a click away. Unfortunately, they don't currently have a method of preserving the source with those merges. When people are trying to gather information, I believe they will merge very likely people and the available data. I do this myself. Sometimes, I am able to confirm further proof but with so many different lines, it's hard to keep every one of them in pristine form. I think what happens is that in the case of FTM, it will prompt people to contribute their information at certain milestones, such as "Congratulations! You have 3,000 people in your file! Would you like to submit your information?" People get some gratification at this little "pat on the back" but don't realize that everything they have is not necessarily correct or sourced. The only thing that I can say is that I don't take anything for granted, and sometimes this information is obviously not a match or valid, in which case I delete individuals or change information about them. It's a constant work-in-progress. But sometimes these little hints may help find the path to the real information. I found an old file in Word from years ago before the advent of the current FTM - I may have been using Brother's Keeper back then, or maybe nothing at all. I found a name, Margaret West, for the wife of my ancestor Alexander Hogue that I didn't remember seeing or had ever entered into my records. As it turned out, the surname was correct but Alexander's wife was Louvicy - Margaret was her sister! This led me to something I had been searching for for 10 years or so! I think that it would be good if Ancestry.com/FTM could be convinced to find a way to mark unproven records as such and to provide the most recent sources with each merge. I don't know if this helps any, but I think this is why and how this is happening. : ) Martha in Dayton, Ohio Mimi Alexander wrote: > Hello List, > > While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! > ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. > > Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! > > Mimi > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- ÐÏࡱá ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Amen, Mimi. Oh, yes! They somehow managed to get my information as well. I once bought an FTM update that came with one of their CDs. I couldn't believe that it had so many of my family names on it. Then I found they had my "work-in-progress" on it was the reason for all of my family names. It was really maddening to pay for my own work. Shirley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mimi Alexander" <wallyjakeandme@msn.com> To: <kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Thanks Martha, and you too, Sharon Clark, for your thoughts on the subject. It does help to know I'm not alone in my views and that others understand the problem. The thing that really bugged me was that, "I personally", had never submitted my own ancestral files and yet.....there they were, ERRORS included made from a zillion years ago! That was how I knew without a doubt that it was mine! Since making those errors many years ago, I've learned the true facts, (names, dates, locations, and spelling of names for example), and have since corrected and documented those earlier incorrect errors, but there it was at ancestry.com - the incorrect data for anyone to see and believe. Maybe Ancestry should have a place to fill out that lists the, "source of documentation", and if there is none, then a certain, "icon", is placed next to that information printed? this way the reader is notified that the data might not be correct. Well...I have that off my chest now so I guess I feel better ~ Thanks you Guys! Mimi ----- Original Message ----- From: Martha Hardcastle Guthrie<mailto:Mothra@woh.rr.com> To: kyallen@rootsweb.com<mailto:kyallen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [KYALLEN] Ancestral data at Ancestry.com ? Mimi, I understand your frustration but genealogy has changed so rapidly in recent years that I don't know the solution is available at present. With Family Tree Maker, a merge of family or people is just a click away. Unfortunately, they don't currently have a method of preserving the source with those merges. When people are trying to gather information, I believe they will merge very likely people and the available data. I do this myself. Sometimes, I am able to confirm further proof but with so many different lines, it's hard to keep every one of them in pristine form. I think what happens is that in the case of FTM, it will prompt people to contribute their information at certain milestones, such as "Congratulations! You have 3,000 people in your file! Would you like to submit your information?" People get some gratification at this little "pat on the back" but don't realize that everything they have is not necessarily correct or sourced. The only thing that I can say is that I don't take anything for granted, and sometimes this information is obviously not a match or valid, in which case I delete individuals or change information about them. It's a constant work-in-progress. But sometimes these little hints may help find the path to the real information. I found an old file in Word from years ago before the advent of the current FTM - I may have been using Brother's Keeper back then, or maybe nothing at all. I found a name, Margaret West, for the wife of my ancestor Alexander Hogue that I didn't remember seeing or had ever entered into my records. As it turned out, the surname was correct but Alexander's wife was Louvicy - Margaret was her sister! This led me to something I had been searching for for 10 years or so! I think that it would be good if Ancestry.com/FTM could be convinced to find a way to mark unproven records as such and to provide the most recent sources with each merge. I don't know if this helps any, but I think this is why and how this is happening. : ) Martha in Dayton, Ohio Mimi Alexander wrote: > Hello List, > > While I subscribe to several genealogical groups, for example: ancestry.com, I have NEVER submitted any research files to them or any other internet research group. I've always entered my research, (and research others have shared with me), into my Family Tree Maker program. My reason for not wanting to submit my research and notes is because, while "some", has been documented, other data remains to be validated with documentation. A little while ago while looking for information on a certain ancestor, I discovered some of my research files are available for viewing at ancestry.com. This angers me because I DID NOT SUBMIT THE DATA. How on earth did they get this information and how could they show it without my personal permission? It's not that I do not want to share.....but rather, I only care to share that data which has been validated with documentation. Now.....people who read it at ancestry.com will take it as valid when in fact, it may not be corr! > ect. Does anyone know how this can happen? No one is happier than me to share with others, but only if it's researched and validated. When I send data that has not been validated, I'm always sure to tell the person exactly that.....or if it's data from another persons research And not mine, I tell them that as well. > > Thanks for listening and allowing me to vent a little steam on this matter! > > Mimi > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- ÐÏࡱá ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com<mailto:KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KYALLEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hobert Morris Sumner. 84. Died February 27, 2007 Glasgow, KY. Stearns, KY native. World War II Navy veteran. Parents: late Pete Sumner and Dollie Griffis Sumner. Wife: late Betty Jane Lowry Sumner. Survivors: wife, Nola Frances Sumner: daughter and son-in-law; Rosemary and John Munsen. Predeceased by: brother, Marvin Sumner. Burial: Crescent Hill Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 8, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

J. D. Sloan. 77. Died February 22, 2007 Scottsville, KY. Allen County native. Parents: late Thurman Sloan and Ruby Jane King Settle. Survivors: sons and daughters-in-law; Timmy and Rita Sloan, Ricky and Sherry Sloan, Randy and Sandy Sloan. Burial: Crescent Hill Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 1, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

James Hinton. 67. Died February 21, 2007 Lafayette, TN. Allen County, KY native. Parents: late Ollie Hinton and Evie Goodrum Hinton. Survivors: wife, Eva Nell Hinton: daughter and son-in-law; Brenda and Tim Huke: brothers; Earl Hinton, Bill Hinton. Burial: Walker's Chapel United Methodist Church Cemetery. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, March 1, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com

John Grace. 79. Died February 17, 2007 Scottsville, KY. Franklin, KY native. Parents: late Samuel Grace and Dovie Jannett Grace. Survivors: sisters; Judy Beatty, Tommie Frye, Mary Thaxton, Nancy Cole: brother, Robert Grace. Predeceased by: sister, Elizabeth Spears. Burial: Restlawn Memory Gardens. Refer to: The Citizen-Times, Febuary 22, 2007, Page 5 Submitted by: Mary Kathern (Chandler) Beadle Sweetpotato14551@Yahoo.Com