Continued from page 1. (just because it's in print) >Resent-Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 06:03:06 -0700 (PDT) >From: M_Lighthall@prodigy.com (MS MARY G LIGHTHALL) >Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 09:02:44, -0500 >Old-To: RICH-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: ML continued >Resent-Message-ID: <"WUyllD.A.pOE.Jm3n1"@fp-1.rootsweb.com> >To: RICH-L@rootsweb.com >Resent-From: RICH-L@rootsweb.com >X-Mailing-List: <RICH-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/215 >X-Loop: RICH-L@rootsweb.com >Resent-Sender: RICH-L-request@rootsweb.com > >Sorry about that. Accidentaly pushed "Send" > >Here is the end of the quote: "Look out for what is printed. It is >not necessarily true, just because it is in print." > >Another case in point. I have worked for about two years on a >descendancy chart of my Rich ancestor. The material came from a known >genealogist of the RFA. The first page was half wrong. Two men >named Isaac Rich were switched and the descendants of one were >listed. The other was the Issac Rich who belonged there in the chart - >- and he had NO descendants. > >So please carry on here but do it with caution. > >Mary Lighthal, and editor of Kinfolk for the Rich Family Association. > > >